What's new

Iran seems to reconsider military entrenchment in Syria Read more

striver44

BANNED
Joined
Jul 25, 2016
Messages
4,832
Reaction score
-16
Country
Indonesia
Location
Indonesia
According to Israeli assessments, Iran has begun giving up on its tremendous military investment in Syria.

RTX3HCP5%20(1)-870.JPG
Iranian and Syrian flags flutter on a truck carrying humanitarian aid in Deir ez-Zor, Syria Sept. 20, 2017. Photo by REUTERS/Omar Sanadiki.

Ben Caspit




Ben Caspit is a columnist for Al-Monitor's Israel Pulse. He is also a senior columnist and political analyst for Israeli newspapers and has a daily radio show and regular TV shows on politics and Israel. On Twitter: @BenCaspit



TOPICS COVERED

coronavirus, qasem soleimani, syrian civil war, iranian intervention, iranian influence, iranian-israeli conflict, irgc

May 5, 2020

Israel did not assume responsibility for the air raid carried out at an unusual location near Aleppo on a strategic Syrian target on the night between May 4 and 5. The Syrians blamed the Israel Air Force for the attack, which, according to foreign media reports, targeted the Syrian Scientific Studies and Research Center in Aleppo, believed to be involved in an Iranian-backed precision missile project. Israel has been accused of other similar strikes in recent years. Unlike this week’s raid, which made headlines in the region, there appear to have been a growing number of airstrikes by unidentified planes against Syrian targets in recent months. Analysts attribute them to a significant acceleration of Israeli activity against the entrenchment of Iranian Shiite forces in the land of Syrian President Bashar al-Assad.

Senior Israeli security sources say that for the first time since the start of Syria’s civil war in 2011 and the parallel Iranian effort to turn Syria into a launch pad for its terrorist activity and a transshipment point for sophisticated military hardware, there are indications that Iran is beginning to pull back from Syrian territory. “Activity on the smuggling front has stopped,” a senior Israeli security source told Al-Monitor on condition of anonymity. “There is also a significant decline in the military presence of Iranian forces and allied Shiite militias.”

According to Israeli assessments, Iran has begun giving up on its tremendous investment in Syria of recent years. According to Western assessments, Israel has taken advantage of the novel coronavirus crisis to intensify its activity against Iranian interests in Syria and its pressure on Tehran. Unlike past attacks, most of the recent raids have been barely reported by the news media, which is wholly focused on the pandemic. The virus has provided Israel with unprecedented room to maneuver. Led by Defense Minister Naftali Bennett, Israel has stepped up its activity, which has begun bearing fruit for the first time since the epidemic broke out.

The stepped-up infrastructure attacks in Syria come as the Iranians recover from the shock of the January killing of Gen. Qasem Soleimani, commander of the Quds Force of Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC). Israeli intelligence sources have described the assassination in Iraq as one of if not the most significant event of the past decade. Soleimani, according to Israeli and foreign defense experts, was irreplaceable. “The man was extraordinarily charismatic and an uncompromising religious zealot,” a former senior intelligence official told Al-Monitor on condition of anonymity. “He would stand on a hill in his keffiyeh, a physical presence commanding the militias, giving out orders, personally overseeing the activity, and that is why things happened.”

Soleimani’s responsibilities have been divided among a host of senior officials and the outcome is becoming felt. Initial signs point to a decline in Iran’s determined and uncompromising posture that fueled its push through Syria toward Lebanon in defiance of Western sanctions and its crippled economy and oblivious to all background noise. “They are now more calculated, hesitant, realizing that the price they are paying is too high,” another security source said on condition of anonymity.

Never miss another story
Sign up for our Newsletter

More specifically, according to some assessments, Soleimani’s key responsibilities have apparently been divided between four people: One is Hezbollah Secretary General Hassan Nasrallah himself, whose involvement on the Dahieh-Tehran axis (the partnership between Hezbollah’s headquarters in Beirut’s Dahieh neighborhood and Iran) has been upgraded significantly. The others, three top Iranian officials, are Brig. Gen. Mohammad Hejazi, the new Quds Force deputy commander who has been tasked with liaison with Hezbollah and with the precision missile project; Ali Shamkhani, head of Iran’s national security council; and Amir Ali Hajizadeh, commander of the IRGC's air force. Western security agencies consider Hajizadeh a “ticking time bomb” and the man responsible for the accidental downing of the Ukrainian passenger jet over Iran this past January and for other challenges directed at the United States and the West.

The division of Soleimani’s responsibilities has not eased the real threat to Iran’s future: its economic decline. The COVID-19 crisis and dramatic plunge of world oil prices have dragged Iran into an abyss from which it will be hard pressed to emerge. Western intelligence sources say Iran’s annual budget is at a decade low, having been based on the faulty forecast of $60 billion in oil exports.

“In reality, last year Iran exported only $20 billion worth of oil,” a Western analyst told Al-Monitor on condition of anonymity. “The amount will not increase this year and that will force them to use their remaining foreign currency reserves to survive the year.” According to various assessments in Jerusalem, the Iranians will be praying for US President Donald Trump’s defeat in November. Though they cannot be sure his successor will immediately lift US economic sanctions, right now it is their only hope.

“They are trying to survive November,” a senior Israeli intelligence official said on condition of anonymity. “Their policy was to land a blow against what they described as a regional campaign against the Middle East’s oil infrastructure, but the opposite happened and the price of oil collapsed.”

The Iranians are hoping for a shift in the American "maximum pressure" campaign against them. For now, that hope is baseless. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, Mossad chief Yossi Cohen and other top officials are in constant touch with leaders in Washington, among them Trump himself and Secretary of State Mike Pompeo, who are assuring them that the United States does not intend to make life easier for Iran.

This is the backdrop for the significant uptick of attacks on Iranian targets in Syria, which along with the toll it is exacting on Assad, is beginning to turn the tide. Israel is near to concluding that the Iranians are starting to turn inward.

“The octopus is starting to fold its tentacles,” another senior Israeli security source told Al-Monitor on condition of anonymity. “It is evident on the ground.” Assad also appears fed up with the heavy price he is paying for the continued Iranian presence. Almost every time his anti-aircraft batteries target planes, he ends up losing them. At the same time, Russia is upping its pressure on Damascus. Russian President Vladimir Putin has long considered the Iranians a burden, rather than an asset, according to intelligence sources.

Israel is adopting cautious optimism in light of these developments. “It is not over, but they are starting to tire,” said a senior official in Jerusalem on condition of anonymity. When asked about the reasons, Israeli security officials simply say, “We try harder.” According to this theory, the Iranian incursion into Syria has become a luxury for Tehran, initially made possible under different circumstances, whereas for Israel, it has always been a matter of survival. Also, for Israel, the Syrian arena is an easy “kill zone” of Iranian targets. Israel enjoys a significant qualitative advantage in terms of intelligence and total air superiority in this region.

“The Iranians are kilometers away from home, completely exposed,” a security source explained on condition of anonymity. “They are beginning to understand it is not really worth their while.’’

https://www.al-monitor.com/pulse/or...n-russia-us-donald-trump-bashar-al-assad.html
 
.
Article is a joke.

Even if Iran reduces its presence now, it will come back later when the atmosphere is not favorable to Israel to conduct air strikes. Makes sense for Iran to wait Israel out. After all Israel can’t strike inside Syria forever. Once the war is concluded and countries leave Syria, Israel will lose the political cover to do air strikes.

After all, Lebanon is much weaker than Syria with no air defense systems and yet Israel rarely targets HZ there. Why? Reason is simple, lack of political cover and high deterrence established by HZ.

So I favor reduced Iranian footprint in Syria. There is no reason for Iran to have that many military base in Syria.

Also it’s surprising how inept Syrian forces are. Yemen has been able to fire and produce several types of missiles under a blockade while Saudi and US assets fly overhead. Yet Syria can not keep a single point SECERT in its own country. Very strange.
 
.
It is very understandable given the current situation faced by the regime. The author is alao right when he refers to syria is a viable and easy kill zone for israel.
Perhaps iran should abandon plans of having syria controlled by an allied shia dictator and instead let the majority sunnis takeover. A democratic syria would be natural enemy of israel, just like democratic egypt was. Having Turkey as neighbor and ally would propel Syria to become a strong force against Israel.
 
.
It seems every few months the Israelis claim Iran is leaving Syria. They are perhaps confusing repositioning with leaving. If not then this seems to be more a cause of wishful thinking than a factual observation of the realities on the ground. Iran will never leave Syria, its physical presence will be there for the foreseeable future. Even if no Iranians are there physically, it will still be there. As it is with Hezbollah in Lebanon, PMU in Iraq etc.
 
.
It seems every few months the Israelis claim Iran is leaving Syria. They are perhaps confusing repositioning with leaving. If not then this seems to be more a cause of wishful thinking than a factual observation of the realities on the ground. Iran will never leave Syria, its physical presence will be there for the foreseeable future. Even if no Iranians are there physically, it will still be there. As it is with Hezbollah in Lebanon, PMU in Iraq etc.

Every few months you hear ohh Russia or Iran would ditch Assad but then nothing happens
 
. . .
Article is a joke.

Even if Iran reduces its presence now, it will come back later when the atmosphere is not favorable to Israel to conduct air strikes. Makes sense for Iran to wait Israel out. After all Israel can’t strike inside Syria forever. Once the war is concluded and countries leave Syria, Israel will lose the political cover to do air strikes.

After all, Lebanon is much weaker than Syria with no air defense systems and yet Israel rarely targets HZ there. Why? Reason is simple, lack of political cover and high deterrence established by HZ.

So I favor reduced Iranian footprint in Syria. There is no reason for Iran to have that many military base in Syria.

Also it’s surprising how inept Syrian forces are. Yemen has been able to fire and produce several types of missiles under a blockade while Saudi and US assets fly overhead. Yet Syria can not keep a single point SECERT in its own country. Very strange.

You think the SAA has problems with keeping information hidden or is Israeli HUMINT/IMINT just that good at discerning what buildings/facilities are being used for certain tasks and acting accordingly?
 
. .
I think this a new record regarding the claims of how much Iran apparently spend in Syria. Even Israelis have yet to go that high.
.
It's even bigger believe me.
Russian presence will be just an old foot print in the mud long before Iranian presence leaves Syria.
the reality on the ground said the otherwise
 
. .
I think this a new record regarding the claims of how much Iran apparently spend in Syria. Even Israelis have yet to go that high.



Russian presence will be just an old foot print in the mud long before Iranian presence leaves Syria.

Gotta hand it the Russians though, they came in knowing what they wanted to do (and not do) and didn't let mission creep affect them all that much. Can't believe some people actually believed the Russians would cover IRGC forces in Syria though lol.

Idk really how to feel about it, I do think Iran should increase its support for Hezbollah for obvious reasons but Israel has been hurting Iran's presence in Syria for quite some time now. Although we really only have Israeli/Syrian sources to rely on for what level of damage the strikes are actually incurring on IRGC forces, time will only tell I guess.
 
Last edited:
. .
THE ONLY reason Iran is in Syria was to help our Syrian allies disband ISIS! Iran didn't invade Syria to withdraw from it!
And as long as the Syrian government can handle the rest then we've done what we set out to do! And the MORONS that think Iran is giving up on Syria should maybe check again on who the President of Syria is today!
Sooner or later Iran is bound to draw back to a purely advisory position militarily and divert the funds more towards reconstruction but I don't think we are fully there yet! And so whatever action Iran is currently taking on the field is probably directly related to COVID-19 so these Israeli's are getting excided over nothing!
 
.
nope the fact that Iran got pushed aside by a relatively newcomer

Franky, Iran would love nothing better than for people to believe that. It will continue to push its agenda in Syria under the cover whilst you are under the impression it is Russia that has the influence and involved there. However, in reality, nobody in the Israeli and US establishment will ever conclude that. They understand fully that the Russian influence can never penetrate to the depth the Iranian one has. Not in Syria, nor anywhere else in the Middle East where Iranian allies are on the ground. This ostensibly strong Russian influence in Syria is much more superficial than people realise.
 
.
Back
Top Bottom