What's new

Iran says sabotage prevented at nuclear facility

ResurgentIran

SENIOR MEMBER
Joined
Feb 11, 2013
Messages
3,813
Reaction score
-4
Iranian authorities have prevented attempted sabotage at the country's heavy water nuclear reactor, a senior official said Saturday without giving specifics as to the nature of the attempted disruption or its suspected initiator.

Asghar Zarean, who heads security at the Atomic Energy Organization of Iran, said domestic intelligence agencies were instrumental in uncovering the plot, which has not been the first attempt to disrupt the contentious nuclear program.

"Several cases of industrial sabotage have been neutralized in the past few months before achieving the intended damage, including sabotage at a part of the IR-40 facility at Arak," he said in a statement issued by his organization Saturday.

In the past, computer viruses have attacked Iranian nuclear facilities. While Zarean did not say whether that was the case this time, his comments coincided with the opening of a specialized lab Tehran says will fight industrial sabotage and neutralize cyberattacks.

"This specialized lab has been launched to identify, prevent and fight threats including modern software viruses," Zarean said.

In 2010, the so-called Stuxnet virus temporarily disrupted operation of thousands of centrifuges, key components in nuclear fuel production, at Iran's Natanz uranium enrichment facility. Iran says it and other computer virus attacks are part of a concerted effort by Israel, the U.S. and their allies to undermine its nuclear program through covert operations.

Some Iranian officials have also suggested in the past that specific European companies may have sold faulty equipment to Iran with the knowledge of American intelligence agencies and their own governments, since the sales would have harmed, rather than helped, the country's nuclear program.

Since then, Iran has also said that it discovered tiny timed explosives planted on centrifuges but disabled them before they could go off. Authorities now claim the Islamic Republic is immune to cyberattacks.

The country has also reported computer virus attacks on its oil facilities, including one in 2012 that disabled Internet connections between the Oil Ministry, oil rigs and a major export facility.

The U.S. and its allies fear Iran may be able to develop a nuclear weapon. Iran denies the charges, saying its nuclear program is peaceful and aimed at generating electricity and producing medical radio isotopes to treat cancer patients.

Iran says sabotage prevented at nuclear facility - Middle East Israel News | Haaretz
 
Do you think that the story is true? = \ ...

Iranian authorities have prevented attempted sabotage at the country's heavy water nuclear reactor, a senior official said Saturday without giving specifics as to the nature of the attempted disruption or its suspected initiator.

Asghar Zarean, who heads security at the Atomic Energy Organization of Iran, said domestic intelligence agencies were instrumental in uncovering the plot, which has not been the first attempt to disrupt the contentious nuclear program.

"Several cases of industrial sabotage have been neutralized in the past few months before achieving the intended damage, including sabotage at a part of the IR-40 facility at Arak," he said in a statement issued by his organization Saturday.

In the past, computer viruses have attacked Iranian nuclear facilities. While Zarean did not say whether that was the case this time, his comments coincided with the opening of a specialized lab Tehran says will fight industrial sabotage and neutralize cyberattacks.

"This specialized lab has been launched to identify, prevent and fight threats including modern software viruses," Zarean said.

In 2010, the so-called Stuxnet virus temporarily disrupted operation of thousands of centrifuges, key components in nuclear fuel production, at Iran's Natanz uranium enrichment facility. Iran says it and other computer virus attacks are part of a concerted effort by Israel, the U.S. and their allies to undermine its nuclear program through covert operations.

Some Iranian officials have also suggested in the past that specific European companies may have sold faulty equipment to Iran with the knowledge of American intelligence agencies and their own governments, since the sales would have harmed, rather than helped, the country's nuclear program.

Since then, Iran has also said that it discovered tiny timed explosives planted on centrifuges but disabled them before they could go off. Authorities now claim the Islamic Republic is immune to cyberattacks.

The country has also reported computer virus attacks on its oil facilities, including one in 2012 that disabled Internet connections between the Oil Ministry, oil rigs and a major export facility.

The U.S. and its allies fear Iran may be able to develop a nuclear weapon. Iran denies the charges, saying its nuclear program is peaceful and aimed at generating electricity and producing medical radio isotopes to treat cancer patients.

Iran says sabotage prevented at nuclear facility - Middle East Israel News | Haaretz
 
Do you think that the story is true? = \ ...

Its not so inconceivable. They've done cyber-attacks before remember?
Israel/US planted the stuxnet virus, which did succeed in slowing the program down, but then it was neutralized (albeit taking some time).
They also tried again with flame-virus.

The bad news for them is that Iran has gotten more advanced in cyber capabilities, as a result of their offensives.

The heavy water reactor is of much graver concern for them, because if it were to come online it would signficantly reduce Iran's "break-out" time.
 
I think the world will just give up and allow Iran to become a nuclear energy efficient nation, maybe even a nuclear power. I'm not too sure about Israel, they say they will prevent a nuclear Iran at any cost, however we ordinary civilians don't really know about either sides military capacity and long range capabilities.

Iran has many mountains though which they could use to their advantage.
 
I think the world will just give up and allow Iran to become a nuclear energy efficient nation, maybe even a nuclear power. I'm not too sure about Israel, they say they will prevent a nuclear Iran at any cost, however we ordinary civilians don't really know about either sides military capacity and long range capabilities.

Iran has many mountains though which they could use to their advantage.

We are already a de facto nuclear power though. Nuclear bombs has one purpose, which is deterrence.
Our strategic doctrine is one of having a certain degree of nuclear capability. A so called nuclear "latency". Which we have due to our enrichment capabilities.

As far as nuclear detterence goes, you dont need assembled bombs to have deterrence.
You want to compare us with the "Japan model". Ie Japan has the infrastructure, technological know-how, resources and scientific base to produce a nuclear weapon if ever decided to dash for the bomb.

Israel aint gonna do squat. If they were gonna bomb, they would have done so much earlier.
Not now, when Iran's program is far more advanced. The new generations centrifuges are 15 times more powerful than older generation.
Besides they dont have the military capacity to carry out a successful strike. The Fordow enrichment facility is buried deep under a mountain in a hardened high performance concrete facility.
Such an operation requires sustained bombing for days and powerful bombs. Israel just doesnt have the logistics.
They'll continue to yap their big mouth, but a dog that barks seldom bites. :)
 
@ResurgentIran

Are you sure? Because if the power in the region is balanced that will provide obstacles to Israel and it might put the region into a nuclear arms race.

I honestly never thought I'd live to see the day of a nuclear armed Middle East and I want Iran to get the region into a nuclear arms race. I wonder how far the international world is willing to go to prevent it, I guarantee you if the western world had the economy to attack every Muslim nation involved in a nuclear weapons race they would do it.

This is honestly a crazy future ahead for the Middle East and I don't want to see any nuclear weapons used that would destroy Palestine and those weapons are disturbing in my opinion.

However, I know their purpose and I believe a nuclear armed Middle East could lead to all out conventional wars.

How do you see the future ahead?
 
@ResurgentIran

Are you sure? Because if the power in the region is balanced that will provide obstacles to Israel and it might put the region into a nuclear arms race.

I honestly never thought I'd live to see the day of a nuclear armed Middle East and I want Iran to get the region into a nuclear arms race. I wonder how far the international world is willing to go to prevent it, I guarantee you if the western world had the economy to attack every Muslim nation involved in a nuclear weapons race they would do it.

This is honestly a crazy future ahead for the Middle East and I don't want to see any nuclear weapons used that would destroy Palestine and those weapons are disturbing in my opinion.

However, I know their purpose and I believe a nuclear armed Middle East could lead to all out conventional wars.

How do you see the future ahead?

I dont think there is gonna be a nuclear arms race. Iran is NOT going for the bomb. That was the point I was conveying in my earlier post. We are stopping at the capability.
Khamenei has issued a fatwah against the use AND possession of a nuclear bomb.

We are a de facto nuclear power, without having assembled bombs.
An assembled bomb does not have more strategic value, than a latent nuclear capability.
 
Do you think that the story is true? = \ ...

and they also hijack US drones, by hijacking US satellites temporarily but US didn't mind in the end!
bed time stories for stupid public.
 
I dont think there is gonna be a nuclear arms race. Iran is NOT going for the bomb. That was the point I was conveying in my earlier post. We are stopping at the capability.
Khamenei has issued a fatwah against the use AND possession of a nuclear bomb.

We are a de facto nuclear power, without having assembled bombs.
An assembled bomb does not have more strategic value, than a latent nuclear capability.

So is Khamenei directing the path Iran takes? :)

I see what you're saying.
 
Back
Top Bottom