Iran has two months until Azerbaijan prescribes polo to itself

[rmi5]

They were, as like said this was something which took place over centuries.

This is a quote from Ajayib Al-Dunya, 13th century.

Arran: No other site has as many Turks: they say there are a hundred thousand Turkish horsemen.
http://www.vostlit.info/Texts/rus11/Cudesa_2/frametext.htm

And this was only 13th century. It is well known that the migration of tribes continued well into 15th century.

What is a "Turkic mixture"? Are you saying that Turks were 100% Mongoloid? To have 10-15% "Mongoloid" admix doesn't means you are 10-15% Turkic, it means you are at least half of that. But there is no doubt that Oghuz Turks had mixed with Iranian populations even in Central Asia. And what he posted showed the same 10-15% for certain areas of Anatolia and whole of Azerbaijan.

What? How could they have "accepted" a language from nowhere? Their language are very distinct like said, unique, it is not Oghuz. It is older than Oghuz, and much more related to proto-Turkic aswell. I don't rule out mixing btw.

Sorry, I cannot read your link, since it is written in Russian. But, you accept that the current population of azerbaijan is a mixture. is it right?
If you accept it, we can settle on something. which would be that we are a separate ethnic group who are connected to both Turkic people and locals(Iranians).

 

[ASQ-1918]

Populations everywhere is a mixture, how ridiculous would it be to claim that someone is pure? Unless your an Eskimo. Persians are less mixed than us? No, probably even more. But this has nothing to do with identity, that is what I'm saying. That is what Targon said in the other thread too.

 

[rmi5]

Populations everywhere is a mixture, how ridiculous would it be to claim that someone is pure? Unless your an Eskimo. Persians are less mixed than us? No, probably even more. But this has nothing to do with identity, that is what I'm saying. That is what Targon said in the other thread too.

I agree with it too.
Basically, what I have always tried to say is that the theories about being pure is non-sense.
So, I guess we all agree on it.

 

[rmi5]

@ASQ-1918
but about identity, how do you define someones identity?
Azerbaijanis are the ones who revived Iran from ashes of Arab invasion in safavid era. They are the ones who brought shi'ism and formed current Iran.
Actually, the fact is the concept of Iranian identity cannot be separately defined as azerbaijanis and vice versa, like some Pan-farsists and Pan-Turks say.