What's new

Iran and India Are a Match Made in Heaven, And US Threats Won't Stop Them

Dinky

FULL MEMBER
Joined
Aug 13, 2017
Messages
879
Reaction score
0
Country
Australia
Location
Australia
Iran and India Are a Match Made in Heaven, And US Threats Won't Stop Them

"There are too many good reasons for India and Iran to be allies economically."

f04bfb2585ce466eae5a561315483043_18.jpg


Don’t tell the Iran hawks in D.C., isolating Iran won’t work.

Iranian President Hassan Rouhani met with his Indian counterpart Narendra Modi last week and the two signed a multitude of agreements.



The most important of which is India’s leasing of part of the Iranian port of Chabahar on the Gulf of Oman. This deal further strengthens India’s ability to access central Asian markets while bypassing the Pakistani port at Gwadar, now under renovation by China as part of CPEC – China Pakistan Economic Corridor.


CPEC is part of China’s far bigger One Belt, One Road Initiative (OBOR), its ambitious plan to link the Far East with Western Europe and everyone else in between. OBOR has dozens of moving parts with its current focus on upgrading the transport infrastructure of India’s rival Pakistan while Russia works with Iran on upgrading its rail lines across its vast central plateaus as well as those moving south into Iran.

India is investing in Iran’s rails starting at Chabahar and moving north.
iran-india-rail.png

Just Part of the Much-Needed Rail Upgrade Iran Needs to Connect it to India

Chabahar has long been a development goal for Russia, Iran and India. The North-South Transport Corridor (NSTC) was put on paper way back when Putin first took office (2002). And various parts of it have been completed. The full rail route linking Chabahar into the rest of Iran’s rail network, however, has not been completed.



The first leg, to the eastern city of Zahedan is complete and the next leg will take it to Mashhad, near the Turkmenistan border. These two cities are crucial to India finding ways into Central Asia while not looking like they are partaking in OBOR.

Also, from Zahedan, work can now start on the 160+ mile line to Zaranj, Afghanistan.

The recent deal between Iran and India for engines and railcars to run on this line underscores these developments. So, today’s announcements are the next logical step.

The U.S. Spectre
As these rail projects get completed the geopolitical imperatives for the U.S. and it’s anti-Iranian echo chamber become more actute. India, especially under Modi, has been trying to walk a fine line between doing what is obviously in its long-term best interest, deepening its ties with Iran, while doing so without incurring the wrath of Washington D.C.



India is trapped between Iran to the west and China to the east when it comes to the U.S.’s central Asian policy of sowing chaos to keep everyone down, otherwise known as the Brzezinski Doctrine.


India has to choose its own path towards central Asian integration while nominally rejecting OBOR. It was one of the few countries to not send a high-ranking government official to last year’s massive OBOR Conference along with the U.S.

So, it virtue signals that it won’t work with China and Pakistan. It’s easy to do since these are both open wounds on a number of fronts. While at the same time making multi-billion investments into Iran’s infrastructure to open up freight trade and energy supply for itself.

All of which, by the way, materially helps both China’s and Pakistan’s ambitions int the region.

So much of the NTSC’s slow development can be traced to the patchwork of economic sanctions placed on both Russia and Iran by the U.S. over the past ten years. These have forced countries and companies to invest capital inefficiently to avoid running afoul of the U.S.

The current deals signed by Rouhani and Modi will be paid for directly in Indian rupees. This is to ensure that the money can actually be used in case President Trump decertifies the JCPOA and slaps new sanctions on Iran, kicking it, again, out of the SWIFT international payment system.

Given the currency instability in Iran, getting hold of rupees is a win. But, looking at the rupee as a relatively ‘hard’ currency should tell you just how difficult it was for Iran to function without access to SWIFT from 2012 to 2015.

Remember, that without India paying for Iranian oil in everything from washing machines to gold (laundered through Turkish banks), Iran would not have survived that period.

Don’t kid yourself. The U.S. doesn’t want to see these projects move forward. Any completed infrastructure linking Iran more fully into the fabric of central Asia is another step towards an economy independent of Western banking influences.

This is the real reason that Israel and Trump want to decertify the Iran nuclear deal. An economically untethered Iran is something no one in Washington and Tel Aviv wants.

The Fallacy of Control


The reason(s) for this stem from the mistaken belief that the way to ensure Iran’s society evolves the right way, i.e. how we want them to, is to destabilize the theocracy and allow a new government which we have more control over to flourish.


It doesn’t matter that this never works. Punishment of enemies is a dominant neoconservative trait.

When the truth is that the opposite approach is far more likely to produce an Iran less hostile to both Israel and the U.S. Rouhani is the closest thing to a free-market reformer Iran has produced since the 1979 revolution. Putting the country on a stronger economic footing is what will loosen the strings of the theocracy.

We’re already seeing that. Rouhani’s re-election came against record voter turnout and gave him a 57% mandate over a candidate explicitly backed by the mullahs.

That said, there is no magic bullet for solving Iran’s economic problems, which are legion, after years of war both physical and economic. Inflation is down to just 10%, but unemployment is at depression levels. It will simply take time.



The recent protests started as purely economic in nature as the people’s patience with Rouhani’s reforms are wearing thin, not because they aren’t for the most part moving things in the right direction, but because they aren’t happening fast enough.


And you can thank U.S. and Israeli policy for that. Trump’s ‘will-he/won’t-he’ approach to the JCPOA, the open hostility of his administration has the intended effect of retarding investment.

The country’s current economic problems come from a woeful lack of infrastructure thanks to the U.S.’s starving it of outside investment capital for the past seven years alongside a currency collapse.

With the JCPOA in place the investment capital is now just beginning to make its way into the country. It’s taken nearly three years for the fear of U.S. reprisal to wear off sufficiently to allow significant deals to be reached, like these.

Last summer President Trump began making noise over the JCPOA and John McCain pushed through the sanctions bill that nominally targeted Russia, but actually targeted impending European investment into Iran’s oil and gas sectors.

It didn’t and France’s Total still signed a $4+ billion exploration deal with Iran. European majors are lined up to do business with Iran but the sanctions bill is stopping them. And Trump is too much of a mercantilist to see the effects. Iran is evil and blocking them is good for our oil companies.

Full Stop.

Don’t forget last year’s announcement of a new Iran to India gas pipeline, in a deal facilitated by Russia’s Gazprom to ensure a part of India’s future energy needs. This was a pipeline project delayed for nearly two decades as the U.S. (and Hillary Clinton) tried to bring gas down from Turkmenistan, the TAPI pipeline, and cut Iran out of the picture.

Both countries have not benefited from this mutually-beneficial energy trade for more than fifteen years because of U.S. meddling.

India’s Future Is Iran’s
What this summit between Modi and Rouhani ultimately means is that despite all attempts at intimidation and control, self-interest always wins. There are too many good reasons for India and Iran to be allies economically.

And despite our increased military presence in both Afghanistan and Syria beyond all rationality, designed to surround and pressure Iran into submission, in the end it won’t work. India imports 60% of its energy needs.

And while the two countries have been sparring over particulars in developing the important Farzad-B gas field in the Persian Gulf, Rouhani and Modi seem to have created a framework where the two can get a deal done.

On Farzad-B, [Indian Oil Minister] Pradhan said both sides agreed to reove “all the bottlenecks on capex, return (on indina investments) and timeline. We have decided today to reopen and re-engage on all three issues again.”

The oil deal appears to be the most crucial breakthrough since India had reduced Iranian crude imports by a quarter in retaliation for, what officials described as, Iran’s flip-flop over sealing a deal over Farzad-B.

Those words came after Iran cut a better deal for oil exports to India, up to 500,000 more barrels per day, more than doubling 2017’s 370,000 barrels per day.

If Rouhani’s visit can nail down these deals and build further trust between the two countries, he will have moved the ball way down the field for Iran as it pertains to its improving regional relationships with Russia, Turkey and even China.

Because, by getting India to help stabilize Iran’s energy industry and build its transport infrastructure in the east it’s assisting Russia and China’s goals of opening up the former Soviet ‘Stans as well as give them more leverage to craft a security deal in Afghanistan between the Kabul government and the amenable parts of the Taliban.

https://russia-insider.com/en/iran-...-heaven-and-us-threats-wont-stop-them/ri22566
 
. .
Yes, we should more focus to work with our brothers like Saudi, iran, Afghanistan etc
 
. .
Money brothers. Not blood brothers.

Indians and Iranians are blood brother but they fought and split for celestial drink (Amrutham). This is very well documented in both Indian and Iranian history.

Asura
HINDU MYTHOLOGY
WRITTEN BY:
LAST UPDATED: 2-16-2018 See Article History
Alternative Title: ahura
Asura, (Sanskrit: “divine”) Iranian ahura, in Hindu mythology, class of beings defined by their opposition to the devas or suras (gods). The term asura appears first in the Vedas, a collection of poems and hymns composed 1500–1200 BCE, and refers to a human or divine leader. Its plural form gradually predominated and came to designate a class of beings opposed to the Vedic gods. Later the asuras came to be understood as demons. This pattern was reversed in Iran, where ahura came to mean the supreme god and the daevas became demons. In Hindu mythology, the asuras and the devas together sought to obtain amrita (elixir of immortality) by churning the milky ocean. Although they had agreed to share the amrita, strife broke out over its possession, which led to a never-ending conflict.

130743-004-98B6BD2E.jpg

MahishasuraStatue of Mahishasura, a Hindu asura, Chamundi Hills, Mysore, India.Prakash Subbara
 
.
Indians and Iranians are blood brother but they fought and split for celestial drink (Amrutham). This is very well documented in both Indian and Iranian history.

Asura
HINDU MYTHOLOGY
WRITTEN BY:
LAST UPDATED: 2-16-2018 See Article History
Alternative Title: ahura
Asura, (Sanskrit: “divine”) Iranian ahura, in Hindu mythology, class of beings defined by their opposition to the devas or suras (gods). The term asura appears first in the Vedas, a collection of poems and hymns composed 1500–1200 BCE, and refers to a human or divine leader. Its plural form gradually predominated and came to designate a class of beings opposed to the Vedic gods. Later the asuras came to be understood as demons. This pattern was reversed in Iran, where ahura came to mean the supreme god and the daevas became demons. In Hindu mythology, the asuras and the devas together sought to obtain amrita (elixir of immortality) by churning the milky ocean. Although they had agreed to share the amrita, strife broke out over its possession, which led to a never-ending conflict.

130743-004-98B6BD2E.jpg

MahishasuraStatue of Mahishasura, a Hindu asura, Chamundi Hills, Mysore, India.Prakash Subbara
And because of these stupid fairytale millions of Hindu convert to islam and Christianity
Btw all central Asia Pak afgAfghnis Iran and northern India r inhabited by aryan tribes who came from central Asia
Aryan invasion theory south Indian dravdian r different
So yes we r all cousin but then most cases of property r also between relative ;)
 
.
A welcoming news.

Btw partnership between India & Saudi and India & UAE is a way way way stronger then Iran.

And these two GCC countries are not under sanctions but Iran is under 100’s of sanctions ...........

Iran doesn’t want to lose India as buyer of its oil .....
 
.
And because of these stupid fairytale millions of Hindu convert to islam and Christianity
Btw all central Asia Pak afgAfghnis Iran and northern India r inhabited by aryan tribes who came from central Asia
Aryan invasion theory south Indian dravdian r different
So yes we r all cousin but then most cases of property r also between relative ;)

Yes. I agree. In fact Avestan and Sanskrit texts have clearly documented the spit due to the fight over celestial drink Amrutham. My point was only about being blood brothers. India and Pakistan are ablood brothers too but we keep fighting.
 
.
Iran-India relations: A history of peaceful collaboration

By Kaveh Sharifian

Iranian President Hassan Rouhani is on a visit to India this week, repaying a trip by Prime Minister Narendra Modi to Tehran in 2016. Before leaving Tehran, Rouhani said relations between the two nations were historical and deep-rooted, and in his first day in India -- in the city of Hyderabad -- on Thursday he went further to emphasize warm relations between Tehran and New Delhi, saying, “Iran and India enjoy historic and cultural relations that are beyond mere political and economic relations,” hinting at an approach rooted in idealism in international relations, especially with India, rather than one rooted in mere realism.

As Rouhani is visiting India with his high-ranking political and economic delegation that signed major agreements on trade and economic cooperation with the Indian side, here is a glance at relations between the two countries that once shared a common border.

Historic relations

The Shahnameh, or the Book of Kings, the oldest Persian epic composed by the Iranian poet Hakim Abul-Qasim Ferdowsi Tusi (born in 940 CE, completed Shahnameh 1010 CE), has mentioned India in it more than 100 times, indicating the historical and cultural importance of India among Iranians.

ea55e13a-4a35-4c39-aa34-04898cb102af.jpg

Farsi has deep roots in India. (Photo by Reuters)
Before the British colonization of India, for hundreds of years the Farsi or Persian language was the Indian subcontinent's lingua franca and used in administrative affairs and considered the language of the nobility and cultured. For hundreds of years, important works in philosophy, literature, politics and even judicial decrees were written in the Farsi language and many scholars believe more Farsi manuscripts exist in Indian libraries than in Iranian ones. The Farsi language was such an integral part of the Indian culture that one of the most prominent schools/styles of Persian poetry is called the “Indian School” of poetry.

Maryam Papi writes about the importance of the Farsi language in India and says:

It is difficult to think of Persian as an Indian language today. Yet for hundreds of years, Farsi held sway as a language of administration and high culture across the subcontinent. It was brought in by Persiophile central Asians during the 12th century, and played a role very similar to the one English does in modern India. So, in the 17th century, when the Marathi Shivaji wanted to communicate with Rajasthani Jai Singh, the general of the Mughal army in the Deccan, they used Farsi. The elite of 19th century Bengal were bilingual in Farsi and Bangla. Raja Rammohan Roy edited and wrote in a Farsi newspaper, and the favorite poet of Debendranath Tagore, Rabindranth’s father, was Hafez, a 14th century poet from Iran. So impactful was Farsi’s role that India’s largest language today, Hindi, takes its name from a Farsi word meaning “Indian.”

Farsi's official status was replaced with English in 1835 by colonizing forces through the British East India Company which was an imperial vehicle for establishing the economic and political domination of Britain in the entire Indian subcontinent.

1947-1979 relations

After independence from Britain in August 1947, India and Iran briefly became neighbors with hundreds of kilometers of shared borders. With the partition and creation of Pakistan, India’s boundaries with Iran were replaced with Pakistani borders, thus causing distance between the two nations. But more important than geographical boundaries was the influence of the Cold War. Iran’s previous monarchial regime signed the US-supported Central Treaty Organization (CENTO), as an extension of NATO into the Middle East to bloc Soviet Union influence, along with the United Kingdom, Iraq, Turkey and India’s archrival Pakistan. This is while India founded and joined the Non-Aligned Movement (NAM) which, regardless of its designation, had closer ties with the former Soviet Union.

Although the two countries had allegiance to different political blocs, relations were mostly cordial and over the period of almost 30-years, until the Islamic Revolution in Iran, several leaders and prime ministers from both countries exchanged visits. Iran’s toppled monarch, Mohammad Reza Pahlavi, visited India in 1956. Subsequently, Indian Prime Ministers Jawaharlal Nehru and Indira Gandhi visited Iran in their years of tenure.

Post-Revolutionary Relations

After the 1979 revolution in Iran, the CENTO alliance crumbled and Iran quickly joined NAM declaring it had no alliance with the US or the Soviets. This seemed to temporarily boost relations between Tehran and New Delhi. However, tensions arose as a result of Iraq declaring an imposed 8-year war on Iran and the fact that India had very close relations with the dictatorial regime of Saddam Hussein in Iraq and Iraqi MiG pilots were trained in India in the 80s. Even more worrisome for Iran was that from 1958 to 1989 Iraq had provided flying instructors to train Iraqi cadets and assisted in conducting operational fighter, transport and helicopter conversions at other bases.

54124023-6ecf-4363-8497-681a1b97e97b.jpg

File photo shows former Iraqi dictator Saddam Hussein (R) along with then Indian prime minister Indira Gandhi, 1975.
After the Iran-Iraq war and especially after the deterioration of ties between India and the Ba’athist regime in Iraq due to Saddam Hussein’s occupation of Kuwait, relations between Iran and India improved dramatically and in 2001 reached a high point when then Indian Prime Minister Atal Bihari Vajpayee visited Tehran and signed the ‘Tehran Declaration.’ The two nations declared that they realized and were “Conscious of the civilisational affinities and historical links between the two countries,” and that they note “their shared interests, common challenges and aspirations as two ancient civilizations and as two developing countries.”

The Tehran conference was so fruitful that the two sides announced they were “convinced that strengthened bilateral relations will be mutually beneficial and enhance regional peace and stability,” and that Iran and India sought “to build upon the desire of the peoples of both countries to develop closer ties.”

Continuing the policy of “developing closer ties,” former Iranian president Mohammad Khatami visited India in 2003 as the Chief Guest of the Republic Day parade, where he signed “The New Delhi Declaration,” in line with the previous resolution in Tehran, further expanding bilateral ties.

707ccec1-6179-4541-b5cf-bb787db870ce.jpg

This file photo shows former Indian president APJ Abdul Kalam (3rd-L) and his Iranian counterpart Mohammad Khatami at India’s Republic Day parade in 2003.
(Photo by PIB)
The new era of heightened relations particularly displayed an enormous increase in purchases of Iranian crude by India. In 2009 right before the fourth round of UN sanctions on Iran, India had accounted for close to 40% of Iran’s oil exports, making it the second-largest importer of Iranian crude after China.

UN Sanctions and post-sanctions relations

In June 2010, the UN Security Council voted on fresh sanctions against what it alleged were Tehran’s non-compliance with the Security Council's demands about its nuclear program. Before the UNSC vote, the UN nuclear body -- the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) -- voted against Iran paving the way for the Security Council resolution. India followed the US at the IAEA and voted against Iran and also cut energy trade significantly after the vote.

In 2013, the US continued insistence that India should abstain from buying Iranian crude and that New Delhi should completely freeze its economic and financial transactions with Iran. But unlike in 2009, India did not bow to US pressure and continued its tradition of buying oil from Iran.

Nevertheless, in all the turbulent period between the adoption of UN sanctions and the 2015 nuclear deal, struck between Iran and the P5+1 -- the US, UK, Russia, France, China, and Germany -- bilateral relations between the two countries remained cordial, regardless of Western and UN pressures on Iran.

Modi’s visit to Iran in May 2016 marked a new beginning in bilateral relations. The premier held talks with Leader of the Islamic Revolution Ayatollah Ali Khamenei and Rouhani, and New Delhi announced that Indian refiners had cleared part of the $6.4 billion owed to Iran for crude oil imports.

7d52884a-f36b-4282-bd83-0e16f48b9e4b.jpg

Iranian President Hassan Rouhani (L) is welcomed during his official trip to India in February 2018. (Photo by IRNA)
During Modi’s visit to Tehran, India and Iran signed a $500 million deal to build and operate the port of Chabahar on the southern Iranian coast, aimed at boosting connectivity with Afghanistan and central Asia.

As a result of the better times, non-oil trade between Iran and India reached $4.74 billion in the 12 months that followed March 2016, up by 4.17% compared to the same period in the previous year.

A future of ‘expanded’ relations

Rouhani’s trip to India is the latest stage of a burgeoning relationship between the two countries. In their latest round of talks, Rouhani and Modi expressed their respective countries’ preparedness for the enhancement of the relations at the Indian prime minister’s Hyderabad House in the Indian capital, indicating a return to the height of relations in the early 2000s and a possible crafting of a strategic relationship between the two nations.


http://www.presstv.com/DetailFr/201...Hassan-Rouhani-Narendra-Modi-New-Delhi-Tehran
 
.
WTF is a blood brother? Do you guys match blood groups or something?

On topic: Good for Iran and India. No reason why countries should not have friendly relations with whoever they choose to be with.
 
.
Lol now indians would make alot of blood brothers to tackle pakistan. But remember indians afghani and irani knows very well how to milk india.
Dil behlane ke liye khyal he acha he ghalib.
 
.
Lol now indians would make alot of blood brothers to tackle pakistan. But remember indians afghani and irani knows very well how to milk india.
Dil behlane ke liye khyal he acha he ghalib.

Lol. Indians are odd. Their conquerors have now become their "blood" brothers. And they say Pakistanis are confused.
 
.
No surprise northern alliance regime is an equal ally of India after US annihilate Pashtoons by virtue of carpet bombing.
 
.
Looks like Rouhani doesnt care much about his Baluchistan province,

Now, we must recognise Balochistan as country: Minister Subramanian Swamy

https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com...ry-subramanian-swamy/articleshow/58123824.cms



No tremors in Tehran,
Narendra Modi's Balochistan push is causing political earthquakes across Pakistan
http://www.firstpost.com/world/nare...quakes-across-the-western-border-2980550.html


The usual suspects
India should help us like it did for Bangladesh: Baloch activist
//economictimes.indiatimes.com/articleshow/62609508.cms?utm_source=contentofinterest&utm_medium=text&utm_campaign=cppst
https://economictimes.indiatimes.co...desh-baloch-activist/articleshow/62609508.cms


Their historic role with Bauluch separatists since 47
India raises Balochistan, Sindh at UNHRC
https://www.hindustantimes.com/worl...dh-at-unhrc/story-UenNnhZf7dQcUOtzIF0IrL.html


And thousands of fake baloch social media profiles running from the ghetto call centers of mumbai, propgating an independent Baluch state map that includes IRANIAN territory.
balochistan-map.jpg


This all doesnt bother them.Its all good for them as long as they are selling cheap oil to India. Mind-blowing! how can a state compromise on its security.
But would it bother them if god forbid we reach a point to do our own version of operation Olive branch.
 
Last edited:
. .
Back
Top Bottom