Cirit
FULL MEMBER
- Joined
- Nov 16, 2011
- Messages
- 154
- Reaction score
- 0
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
"No traces of explosives or flammable products were found on the debris recovered from the sea," it said.
However Turkey said that there was no explosives found.... and then it denied that it was shot... now it saying that it was shot.... hmmmm Turkey keep changing their minds....
Source: http://www.defence.pk/forums/turkey...ighter-jet-shot-down-syria.html#ixzz26zTvQ2iI
Source: http://www.defence.pk/forums/turkey...ighter-jet-shot-down-syria.html#ixzz26zVELzq8"The actual cause of the incident will be established after the plane wreckage is raised from the seabed," the General Staff of the armed forces said in a statement
“Parts of the retrieved plane wreck were given a metallurgic examination, and traces of potassium chlorate, which is used as an oxidizing agent in missile fuels and as the main substance in missile warheads, were found splashed on the plane’s fuselage” the report was quoted as saying.
Source: http://www.defence.pk/forums/turkey...ighter-jet-shot-down-syria.html#ixzz26zVELzq8
http://www.hurriyetdailynews.com/pr...ssile.aspx?pageID=238&nID=30547&NewsCatID=341
Now, i'm expecting bold moves from the Turkish government.
The report added there was no damage to the plane that might have been caused by fire from an anti-aircraft gun, as Syrian authorities have suggested.
“The missile detonated just behind and to the left of the plane. The blast caused the plane and the pilots to lose the ability to continue a stable flight. The plane continuously lost altitude as it banked left, until it crashed into the water in a position slightly tipped to the left with the plane’s nose pointing up,” the report said.
Now, i'm expecting bold moves from the Turkish government.
You should read again that part.
What do you want? war?? you already have war... you are fighting with the terrorists and hosting their camps and training them..
so no missile and no AA gun... then what is it?? again Turkish keep changing its mind....
and tell us what happened at that NATO meeting after the jet got shot?
I don't know... Taking out the Syrian missile batteries would be nice.
Read the quote in my previous post.
In your dreams......
and the quote you posted also included from the same source of not being sure if it was a missile.... again wouldn't the Turkish radar catch the missile ?? really i think Turkish radars cover northern part of Syria at least....
Apparently, your English is even worse than mine. They say: Although there are no damage that might caused by direct missile impact, there are traces of materials which belongs to a missile. Which means, it was the missile but not a direct hit, which means the blast effect of a missile downed the jet.
Clear?
okay now what about the Turkish Radars and the Missile... if the Missile was shot from Syria... that should be caught on the Turkish radars correct?? especially that USA have a defense system there...
According to an official report, radar data obtained from the plane’s computer indicated that the plane had received a signal from a missile
According to an official report, radar data obtained from the plane’s computer indicated that the plane had received a signal from a missile
NOT THE PLANE RADAR.... THE MAIN RADARS ON THE GROUND.... THE DEFENSE SYSTEM... INCLUDING THE USA'S SYSTEM IN TUKREY
“To make things more complicated, a mid-range missile can be fired from the sea. Turkish radars can only see Syrian land, so a mid-range missile may not be seen from Turkey. Firing the missile from a short range would not eliminate the time in which pilots could save themselves. Furthermore, Syria was not alone on the sea. We know that two frigates from the Russian Navy were there, too,”