What's new

India's own multi caliber rifle

.
When most rest of the world is moving towards the bullpup as standard assault rifle but DRDO fools still stuck in the time capsule.
Our infantry soldier would be most neglected part of our armed forces.
 
.
When most rest of the world is moving towards the bullpup as standard assault rifle but DRDO fools still stuck in the time capsule.
Our infantry soldier would be most neglected part of our armed forces.


Most of the world's militaries aren't moving to bullpop designs. How is DRDO stuck in a time capsule if the platform is multi caliber capable?
 
.
Most of the world's militaries aren't moving to bullpop designs. How is DRDO stuck in a time capsule if the platform is multi caliber capable?
germans , british , french and israelies and even chinese have moved to bullpup configuration assult rifels at starting least a decade or even more ago then what are we waiting for

merits of bullpup

1.smaller and lighter so less fatigue

2.bigger barrel lenth so far better longrange capabillity and same wepon can be used with ease on conventional battlefiels or urban scenario or CQB(bulpup can have a 18" berrel in same lenth as a conventional has 13" barrel)

demerits

1.needs more parts than cinventional assult rifels

2.slightli more irritating for shooter as gases are near eyes and nose of the shooter

3.slightlli shorter lenth picca tenni rails

but in any battle field less fatigue to soldier and longer range shooting capability scorse over anything why the hell owr DODOs still sleeping on it even if army rejected INSAS bulpup in earli 2000 what stopped them in develping a modern version of the same ..... lolzzz they can easily convert latest multi cal wepon system or excalibar to a bullpup

url


url
 
Last edited:
.
germans , british , french and israelies and even chinese have moved to bullpup configuration assult rifels at starting least a decade or even more ago then what are we waiting for

merits of bullpup

1.smaller and lighter so less fatigue

2.bigger barrel lenth so far better longrange capabillity and same wepon can be used with ease on conventional battlefiels or urban scenario or CQB(bulpup can have a 18" berrel in same lenth as a conventional has 13" barrel)

demerits

1.needs more parts than cinventional assult rifels

2.slightli more irritating for shooter as gases are near eyes and nose of the shooter

3.slightlli shorter lenth picca tenni rails

but in any battle field less fatigue to soldier and longer range shooting capability scorse over anything why the hell owr DODOs still sleeping on it even if army rejected INSAS bulpup in earli 2000 what stopped them in develping a modern version of the same ..... lolzzz they can easily convert latest multi cal wepon system or excalibar to a bullpup

url
When most rest of the world is moving towards the bullpup as standard assault rifle but DRDO fools still stuck in the time capsule.
Our infantry soldier would be most neglected part of our armed forces.

0j73.jpg

bullpup version of MCIWS
HAPPY NOW??
 

Attachments

  • 7auY0fW.jpg
    7auY0fW.jpg
    65.3 KB · Views: 23
.
germans , british , french and israelies and even chinese have moved to bullpup configuration assult rifels at starting least a decade or even more ago then what are we waiting for

merits of bullpup

1.smaller and lighter so less fatigue

2.bigger barrel lenth so far better longrange capabillity and same wepon can be used with ease on conventional battlefiels or urban scenario or CQB(bulpup can have a 18" berrel in same lenth as a conventional has 13" barrel)

demerits

1.needs more parts than cinventional assult rifels

2.slightli more irritating for shooter as gases are near eyes and nose of the shooter

3.slightlli shorter lenth picca tenni rails

but in any battle field less fatigue to soldier and longer range shooting capability scorse over anything why the hell owr DODOs still sleeping on it even if army rejected INSAS bulpup in earli 2000 what stopped them in develping a modern version of the same ..... lolzzz they can easily convert latest multi cal wepon system or excalibar to a bullpup

url


url


French will replace their FAMAs with a gun that's mostly like a non bullpop rifle.Germans are using the G36, not bullpop.

Chinese, Britain, Australia, currently France, Israel are using bullpops.

Most countries are using conventional rifle layouts, and most rifles under development aren't bullpops. To most of the militaries, the trade offs arent worth it.

View attachment 238388
bullpup version of MCIWS
HAPPY NOW??


fake
 
. . .
Add agility, handling, light recoil, stable, extreme control to that merit list.
Add Britain, South Africa, South korea and last but not least Singaporean SAR 21 with best assault rifle on planet earth.
germans , british , french and israelies and even chinese have moved to bullpup configuration assult rifels at starting least a decade or even more ago then what are we waiting for

merits of bullpup

1.smaller and lighter so less fatigue

2.bigger barrel lenth so far better longrange capabillity and same wepon can be used with ease on conventional battlefiels or urban scenario or CQB(bulpup can have a 18" berrel in same lenth as a conventional has 13" barrel)

demerits

1.needs more parts than cinventional assult rifels

2.slightli more irritating for shooter as gases are near eyes and nose of the shooter

3.slightlli shorter lenth picca tenni rails

but in any battle field less fatigue to soldier and longer range shooting capability scorse over anything why the hell owr DODOs still sleeping on it even if army rejected INSAS bulpup in earli 2000 what stopped them in develping a modern version of the same ..... lolzzz they can easily convert latest multi cal wepon system or excalibar to a bullpup

url


url
 
. . . . .
When most rest of the world is moving towards the bullpup as standard assault rifle but DRDO fools still stuck in the time capsule.
Our infantry soldier would be most neglected part of our armed forces.
You should be asking the Army this question,its them who issue the requirements,DRDO develops based on the requirements
 
.
You should be asking the Army this question,its them who issue the requirements,DRDO develops based on the requirements
i guess army dosent wants to go with bulpups as most russian american and italian firearm manufacturers use conventional layowt and top army brass loves russian italian and american hardware for the "obvious" reasons :devil:
 
.
Back
Top Bottom