What's new

India's muted response to Trump's Jerusalem move stokes Arab unease

idune

ELITE MEMBER
Joined
Dec 14, 2008
Messages
13,663
Reaction score
-40
Country
Bangladesh
Location
United States

India's muted response to Trump's Jerusalem move stokes Arab unease


18 December 2017 - 10:59 By Reuters


A protester sits in a chair in front of a barricade during a protest against US President Donald Trump's decision to recognize Jerusalem as the capital of Israel, near the Jewish settlement of Beit El, near the West Bank city of Ramallah December 17, 2017.
Image: REUTERS/Goran Tomasevic


A dozen Arab ambassadors have asked India to clarify its position on the US recognition of Jerusalem as Israel's capital, diplomatic sources said, after New Delhi's muted response suggested a shift in support for the Palestinian cause.

US President Donald Trump abruptly reversed decades of US policy this month when he recognised Jerusalem as Israel's capital, generating outrage from Palestinians. Trump also plans to move the US embassy to Jerusalem from Tel Aviv.

Countries around the world, including US allies Britain and France, criticised Trump's decision, but India did not take sides.

Instead, the Indian foreign ministry in a brief statement, said India's position was consistent and independent of any third party.

The bland statement made no reference to Jerusalem and prompted criticism at home that it was insufficient, vague and anti-Palestinian.

Israel maintains that all of Jerusalem is its capital. Palestinians want East Jerusalem as the capital of a future independent state and say Trump's move has left them marginalised and jeopardised any hopes of a two-state solution.

Last week, envoys from Arab states including Saudi Arabia, Egypt and Kuwait based in New Delhi met Indian junior foreign minister M.J. Akbar to brief the government about an Arab League meeting on December 9 condemning the U.S. decision, a diplomatic and an Indian government source said.

The envoys also sought a more forthright Indian response, the sources said.

But Akbar gave no assurance and the Indian source said the government had no plans for a further articulation on Jerusalem, which is at the heart of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.

"Akbar did not promise anything," the diplomatic source briefed on the meeting said, speaking on the condition of anonymity because of diplomatic sensitivities.

India was one of the earliest and vocal champions of the Palestinian cause during the days it was leading the Non-Aligned Movement while it quietly pursued ties with Israel.

But under Prime Minister Narendra Modi, New Delhi has moved to a more open relationship with Israel, lifting the curtain on thriving military ties and also homeland security cooperation.

Modi's Hindu nationalist ruling group views Israel and India as bound together in a common fight against Islamist militancy and long called for a public embrace of Israel.

Modi in July made a first trip to Israel by an Indian prime minister and did not go to Ramallah, the headquarters of the Palestinian Authority and a customary stop for leaders trying to maintain a balance in political ties.

P.R. Kumaraswamy, a leading Indian expert on ties with Israel at New Delhi's Jawaharlal Nehru University, said a "major shift" on India's policy had been evident since early this year when Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas visited New Delhi.

"With the Palestinian president standing by his side, Prime Minister Modi reiterated India’s support for Palestinian statehood but carefully avoided any direct reference to East Jerusalem," he said.

For decades, India’s support for a Palestinian state was accompanied by an explicit reference to East Jerusalem being the Palestinian capital. But Delhi has moved to a more balanced position, refusing to take sides in an explosive dispute, he said.

During the meeting last week, the ambassadors of Saudi Arabia, Egypt, Somalia and the Palestinian Authority spoke, the diplomatic source said. Besides the dozen envoys there were charges d'affaires from several other countries in the region.

"They were expecting more from India, perhaps to denounce Israel and the US" said former Indian ambassador to Jordan and Anil Trigunayat. "But would it really make a difference, adding one more voice?"

https://www.timeslive.co.za/news/wo...-to-trumps-jerusalem-move-stokes-arab-unease/
 
.
charity begins at home, lebanon , palestine, syria...etc who is the main supporter?

upload_2017-12-19_20-27-14.png
 
. .
LOL Arabs thought they had India as their ally...
 
. .
Perhaps we should ask Arab countries to clarify their position on Kashmir.

Don’t give us this BS now. Arabs expect you to be on their side. Show some brotherhood. Don’t try to act smart with this neutral stance. It is one or the other.
 
. . .
So Palestine is happy with India's stand, but Saudi, Egypt and Kuwait aren't?
Really says a lot about the utility of the "Palestinian cause".
Just something that everyone except Palestinians wanna circle jerk and score points with.

Presenting his country’s view, Palestinian envoy to India Adnan Abu Alhaija indicated to The Hindu that he is satisfied with India’s response to Mr. Trump’s announcement and said: “India has reiterated its support to the pre-1967-war border of Palestine which obviously includes the East Jerusalem and its holy places of worship and God willing, we will soon be welcoming Prime Minister Narendra Modi to Palestine.”
 
. .
Since when has india sided with arabs before.

Arab stance has been neutral on Kashmir
 
. .
Yes, we will prefer Israel as a more reliable partner. I believe recent Indian action says that loud and clear.

That is kinda weird considering your government likes to remain neutral. You got some convincing to do here.
 
.
Maybe someone should ask israel to ask India the same question.
 
.
Maybe someone should ask israel to ask India the same question.
We will answer in a regular way, "This is an internal issue, the international community should come together to find a solution rather than looking for war". :D

Why the F would we fight along Arabs or Israel. Arabs got the Ummah and Islamic Mil Alliance, probably the best way to get Iran into this. Israeli's got the west.
We'll watch that from gallery:pop: may be China join us too. Oh! Aren't you gonna ask Taller than Mountain buddy to help them beat the evil zionist? (I guess the above response will be copy-pasted by the Chinese too)

@Azadkashmir Do the Arabs or Israeli gives us any freebies?
Have they given us? You might remember who gave you oil during war times and still gives oil at lower prices.
We certainly do not enjoy such freebies. We pay hard earned money to both Arabs and Israeli. We will be peaceniks.
 
.
Back
Top Bottom