What's new

India’s MTCR membership: Intense arms race ahead

Devil Soul

ELITE MEMBER
Joined
Jun 28, 2010
Messages
22,931
Reaction score
45
Country
Pakistan
Location
Pakistan
India’s MTCR membership: Intense arms race ahead
By Naveed Ahmad
Published: June 29, 2016

India overcame its last hurdle in becoming the 35th member of the Missile Technology Control Regime (MTCR) after it released an Italian marine’s Salvatore Girone on May 29th. Although, the club’s name is misleading as it implies that it gives a few elites the right to buy and sell high-end technology while denying the rest, last year, Rome had blocked Delhi’s membership to this elite bloc.

Preventing proliferation: India joins missile tech sale group

Even though India needs a more aggressive American push for its Nuclear Suppliers’ Group (NSG), a club of nation’s signatory to the Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT), it has still managed to surpass China whose membership bid in the MTCR has failed to receive a consensus nod since 2004. Beijing has, however, maintained adherence to the regime’s export control guidelines. Moreover, it is widely alleged that North Korean missile programme is based on Chinese technology, while Pakistan says it is not ready for the membership of the voluntary club.

America’s support for India

The Modi government is celebrating the success in media even after being attacked for poor homework on the NSG bid. The nation owes much to Washington for granting a waiver after US-India nuclear deal in 2008. Ever since, US President Obama has fully sponsored India’s entry in the four key exports control bodies – the NSG, the MTCR, the Wassenaar Arrangement and the Australia Group.

On the other hand, China’s absence helped India sail through the membership process. But for the NSG slot it needs Beijing’s support, which is a far cry as Beijing will be directly affected by India’s entry in the MTCR, which allows her to sell missiles within 300kilometre of range and are capable of carrying 500 kilogrammes of payload. Moreover, Delhi’s first customer for Indo-Russia co-developed BrahMos cruise missile is Vietnam and the capital’s increasing involvement in the South China Sea will serve as an irritant to Sino-India relations.

India joins elite group controlling exports in missile technology

Besides, not only the membership of the missile club gives India the right to sell missiles and projectiles within certain specifications, it also can buy high-end technology its scientists have been unable to develop or obtain reverse-engineering. The US confidence in India and its signing of the club membership will improve its worthiness to buy hi-tech systems from other advanced countries, as the American law clearly distinguishes between member states and the others. For Washington, India will be a desperate client as it will be able to invest long term and serve to its hegemonic designs.

Recently, the scope of MTCR was widened to include platforms such as unmanned aerial vehicles. Considering India has developed a long wish-list for drones such as the Avenger, Reaper and Global Hawk, there are no legal glitches in the way of their purchase. Much now will depend on which technology the exporters want to sell and whether Delhi can foot the bill.

Moreover, India has been eyeing at Israel’s Arrow II missile defence system. The membership benefits her to access the hi-tech missile shield against advanced Chinese and Pakistani rockets. Besides Obama’s concessions and waiver for India has continuously fed into India’s hawkish designs, creating greater disparities in regional balance of power. Meanwhile, Delhi continued to strengthen its technological cooperation with Russia. The two-way technological support to India will continue to fuel arms race in the region.

The rising pressure on Pakistan

Given the western domination and bias, Beijing has not pressed hard for its membership of the MTCR. Instead, it has further enhanced its indigenous capability in long-range hypersonic systems to launch satellites in the space and warheads or anti-ballistic missiles.

India may become full NSG member by year-end, says US official

Similarly, Pakistan has its own indigenous missile and UAV development programme in times of technology denial. Delhi’s forthcoming acquisition of Russia-n S-400 missile defence system coupled with its missile programme puts additional strain on Islamabad. Force deployment on the borders manifests that India’s foremost enemy remains Pakistan and not China. With provision of even more advanced technology after joining the MTCR, Delhi will be able to enhance performance and payload of its missiles besides boosting its other related capabilities.

Moreover, Obama wants India to become an NSG member before he leaves the White House. The MTCR membership along with the other two export control regimes are set to pave Delhi’s way to the NSG. But neither is India an alliance nor in full compliance with the obligations of the NPT and various nuclear weapon free zone treaties and also has shabby records in enforcing a comprehensive safeguards agreement with the International Atomic Energy Agency. Moreover, although less publicised by the popular western and Indian media, the nuclear safety issues in India has been alarmingly high.

How serious is India?

Nonetheless, Narendra Modi continues to aggressively push India’s case in all such prestigious clubs as the opposition at the NSG is not as mild as in the case of MTCR. Amongst its 10 opponents in 48-nation club includes China, Turkey, New Zealand, Austria, Ireland and Brazil. But even if India is kept out of the NSG, its MTCR status will help her topple the balance of power in the region further while feeding into an intense arms race under the risk of a nuclear conflict.

Naveed Ahmad is a Pakistani investigative journalist and academic with extensive reporting experience in the Middle East and North Africa. He is based in Doha and Istanbul. He tweets @naveed360.
 
. . .
India’s MTCR membership: Intense arms race ahead
By Naveed Ahmad
Published: June 29, 2016

India overcame its last hurdle in becoming the 35th member of the Missile Technology Control Regime (MTCR) after it released an Italian marine’s Salvatore Girone on May 29th. Although, the club’s name is misleading as it implies that it gives a few elites the right to buy and sell high-end technology while denying the rest, last year, Rome had blocked Delhi’s membership to this elite bloc.

Preventing proliferation: India joins missile tech sale group

Even though India needs a more aggressive American push for its Nuclear Suppliers’ Group (NSG), a club of nation’s signatory to the Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT), it has still managed to surpass China whose membership bid in the MTCR has failed to receive a consensus nod since 2004. Beijing has, however, maintained adherence to the regime’s export control guidelines. Moreover, it is widely alleged that North Korean missile programme is based on Chinese technology, while Pakistan says it is not ready for the membership of the voluntary club.

America’s support for India

The Modi government is celebrating the success in media even after being attacked for poor homework on the NSG bid. The nation owes much to Washington for granting a waiver after US-India nuclear deal in 2008. Ever since, US President Obama has fully sponsored India’s entry in the four key exports control bodies – the NSG, the MTCR, the Wassenaar Arrangement and the Australia Group.

On the other hand, China’s absence helped India sail through the membership process. But for the NSG slot it needs Beijing’s support, which is a far cry as Beijing will be directly affected by India’s entry in the MTCR, which allows her to sell missiles within 300kilometre of range and are capable of carrying 500 kilogrammes of payload. Moreover, Delhi’s first customer for Indo-Russia co-developed BrahMos cruise missile is Vietnam and the capital’s increasing involvement in the South China Sea will serve as an irritant to Sino-India relations.

India joins elite group controlling exports in missile technology

Besides, not only the membership of the missile club gives India the right to sell missiles and projectiles within certain specifications, it also can buy high-end technology its scientists have been unable to develop or obtain reverse-engineering. The US confidence in India and its signing of the club membership will improve its worthiness to buy hi-tech systems from other advanced countries, as the American law clearly distinguishes between member states and the others. For Washington, India will be a desperate client as it will be able to invest long term and serve to its hegemonic designs.

Recently, the scope of MTCR was widened to include platforms such as unmanned aerial vehicles. Considering India has developed a long wish-list for drones such as the Avenger, Reaper and Global Hawk, there are no legal glitches in the way of their purchase. Much now will depend on which technology the exporters want to sell and whether Delhi can foot the bill.

Moreover, India has been eyeing at Israel’s Arrow II missile defence system. The membership benefits her to access the hi-tech missile shield against advanced Chinese and Pakistani rockets. Besides Obama’s concessions and waiver for India has continuously fed into India’s hawkish designs, creating greater disparities in regional balance of power. Meanwhile, Delhi continued to strengthen its technological cooperation with Russia. The two-way technological support to India will continue to fuel arms race in the region.

The rising pressure on Pakistan

Given the western domination and bias, Beijing has not pressed hard for its membership of the MTCR. Instead, it has further enhanced its indigenous capability in long-range hypersonic systems to launch satellites in the space and warheads or anti-ballistic missiles.

India may become full NSG member by year-end, says US official

Similarly, Pakistan has its own indigenous missile and UAV development programme in times of technology denial.
. Force deployment on the borders manifests that India’s foremost enemy remains Pakistan and not China. With provision of even more advanced technology after joining the MTCR, Delhi will be able to enhance performance and payload of its missiles besides boosting its other related capabilities.

Moreover, Obama wants India to become an NSG member before he leaves the White House. The MTCR membership along with the other two export control regimes are set to pave Delhi’s way to the NSG. But neither is India an alliance nor in full compliance with the obligations of the NPT and various nuclear weapon free zone treaties and also has shabby records in enforcing a comprehensive safeguards agreement with the International Atomic Energy Agency. Moreover, although less publicised by the popular western and Indian media, the nuclear safety issues in India has been alarmingly high.

How serious is India?

Nonetheless, Narendra Modi continues to aggressively push India’s case in all such prestigious clubs as the opposition at the NSG is not as mild as in the case of MTCR. Amongst its 10 opponents in 48-nation club includes China, Turkey, New Zealand, Austria, Ireland and Brazil. But even if India is kept out of the NSG, its MTCR status will help her topple the balance of power in the region further while feeding into an intense arms race under the risk of a nuclear conflict.

Naveed Ahmad is a Pakistani investigative journalist and academic with extensive reporting experience in the Middle East and North Africa. He is based in Doha and Istanbul. He tweets @naveed360.


First of all Pakistan should forget about the so called arms race.They should see the accomplishment of India through a mature diplomatic perspective .
Pakistan should accept this reality .They cant compete with India .And India dont want to attack others .We are doing all this to protect our defense .Defence needs of a nation will increase proportionally to that nation economy.


Delhi’s forthcoming acquisition of Russia-n S-400 missile defence system coupled with its missile programme puts additional strain on Islamabad

Put additional strain because they have some nefarious design against India .If you drop that then you dont have anything to worry about.
 
.
Silly post. Any membership for India be it NSG, MTCR, the Wassenaar Arrangement and the Australia Group is not going to change any military balance between India and Pakistan. Pakistan has enough nukes and delivery system to cause unacceptable damage to India. The parity has been established with the introduction of nukes. India wants those membership for prestige and for dual use technology.
 
. .
For once, I thought this article was written by an Augusta Patrakar (Anti National Congress, presstitutes).

When we talk about Arms race always remember we do it to strengthen our defence. India has no first use policy but Pakistan does not have No First Use Policy or at least they have not said it openly...

Arms race with China.
Not with Pakistan.
We do not need MTCR for Pakistan.
 
.
while Pakistan says it is not ready for the membership of the voluntary club.

.

that line make me smile ....:p::buba_phone::D

The_Fox_and_the_Grapes.jpg
 
.
For once, I thought this article was written by an Augusta Patrakar (Anti National Congress, presstitutes).



Arms race with China.
Not with Pakistan.
We do not need MTCR for Pakistan.
Of course we compete with China and not Pakistan. However, I emphasised on the "No first Use Policy" indirectly we are not comfortable about Pakistan as an immediate neighbour with loads of nuclear Arsenal..
 
.
Given the western domination and bias, Beijing has not pressed hard for its membership of the MTCR. Instead, it has further enhanced its indigenous capability in long-range hypersonic systems to launch satellites in the space and warheads or anti-ballistic missiles.



Naveed Ahmad is a Pakistani investigative journalist and academic with extensive reporting experience in the Middle East and North Africa. He is based in Doha and Istanbul. He tweets @naveed360.


:p:





The People's Republic of China is not a member of the MTCR but has agreed to abide by the original 1987 Guidelines and Annex, but not the subsequent revisions. China first verbally pledged that it would adhere to the MTCR in November 1991, and included these assurances in a letter from its Foreign Minister in February 1992. China reiterated its pledge in the October 1994 US-China joint statement. In their October 1997 joint statement, the United States and China stated that they agree "to build on the 1994 Joint Statement on Missile Nonproliferation."

In 2004 China applied to join the MTCR, but members did not offer China membership because of concerns about China's export control standards.



Look Like Author forget deliberately ????
 
.
Intense arms race ahead. Yes, but only for countries that can afford it.
 
. .
Name any country which cannot either afford or procure weapons illegally?

Procuring is different from an arms race.
Do you call DPRK procuring weapons to use against USA an arms race both of them are involved in ?
In reality USA is leagues ahead.
 
.
Back
Top Bottom