Nehru had said: “Article 370 is part of certain transitional provisional arrangements. It is not a permanent part of the Constitution. It is a part as long as it remains so. As a matter of fact, it has been eroded, if I may use the word, and many things have been done in the last few years which have made the relationship of Kashmir with the Union of India very close.”
Nehru continued: “There is no doubt that Kashmir is fully integrated. The fact that there may be some special matters attached to it does not come in the way of integration at all, and I gave as an instance that in Kashmir citizens of India other than those of Kashmir are not allowed to buy land or own property. I think it is a very good rule which should continue, because Kashmir is such a delectable place that moneyed people will buy up all the land there to the misfortune of the people who live there.”
All you say is blah blah religious bigotry blah blah terrorism, without knowing that Kashmiris are simply angry over Delhi's broken promises, time after time after time.
Kashmiris have very valid reasons to be angry with Delhi, for unilaterally removing their central defining rights within the state of Kashmir (albeit "eroded"; it retained some useful function but even that thin veil of trust has been thrown off by Delhi).
This is the harsh reality of a colossal disenfranchisement of a people as the underlying cause of their struggle, that doesn't quite tally with all the big talk of religious bigotry and terrorism.
Now scoot off and bother someone else with your works of fiction.