Dada - why go into dick measuring? Kheplen kano?
Not our fault your CLW and DLW can't make reliable copies of 50's era super simple locomotives.
Your Tutta dhoti is no better than our Fata Lungi - the difference is that we in Bangladesh don't claim to be Sanghi superpower and don't have people sitting by trackside in the morning showing backside and doing morning routine. Being Rail fan (I am one as well) you must have some idea.
That type of thing is not happening in Bangladesh while it happens in India (especially in cities like Delhi and Mumbai) every day.
And about WDM2 and WDM3 they are the 1960's copies of Alco Century series (export designation DL560C series for India) which is a simple, super simple, reliable-as-an-anvil US product which your factories managed to make cheap unreliable copies of over the years.
There are Locos supplied by Montreal Locomotive works and Alco USA itself in 1965 onward to Bangladesh which are largely surviving in Bangladesh, are preferred in service in our Railway and look way better than Indian supplied locos from less than ten years ago. Most Indian supplied locos don't last more than fifteen years in service here.
Take a look - these were supplied by US and Canada in the 1960's (BR classes 6000 and 6100). 17 out of 18 are still running.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bangladesh_Railway_Class_6000
Should you ask why? And why your loco makers can only supply locos to a country like Bangladesh (and maybe one or two to Sri Lanka)? Why every country is unanimous about the bad quality of your products, and that you only supply your own market?
I think that soul searching needs to happen first (and corrective actions taken) instead of blaming customers - or making them feel like its a Godsend (shat rajar bhaggo) they are getting Indian products supplied.
We are customers - hence, deserve the right to compare and criticize. I'm sorry if you can't take objective criticism at face value.
And now you are tagging a known troll just to turn this thread into a slinging mudfest - instead of arguing with logic.
@krash bhai please see this behavior.