What's new

Featured Indian Parliament attack was an Inside Job

N.Siddiqui

ELITE MEMBER
Joined
Nov 21, 2015
Messages
9,714
Reaction score
13
Country
Pakistan
Location
Pakistan
Indian govt behind parliament, Mumbai attacks, claims former CBI official


NEW DELHI: A member of a Special Investigating Team (SIT) of India's Central Bureau of Investigation had accused incumbent governments of "orchestrating" the terror attack on Indian Parliament and the 2008 Mumbai attacks, The Times of India reported on Sunday.

A former Indian home ministry officer submitted his declaration in the Supreme Court of India which said that he was told by a former member of the CBI-SIT team that both the terror attacks (Parliament and Mumbai) were staged "with the objective of strengthening the counter-terror legislation(sic)."

The affidavit also included reference to the attack on the Indian parliament in December 2001 which was followed by the controversial Prevention of Terrorism Act (Pota), and the 2008 Mumbai attacks which led to amendments in the Unlawful Activities Prevention Act (UAPA).

The revelations came during a hearing in the Indian Supreme Court regarding the killing of a 19-year-old Indian Muslim girl in India's Gujrat state in June 2004.

Indian police had claimed that Ishrat Jahan and three Muslim men, two of them alleged to be Pakistanis, were killed as they set off with a stash of arms and explosives to kill Gujarat Chief Minister Narendra Modi.

The murder plot was refuted by the victim's mother who had called for an investigation to take place on a federal level.


 
Last edited:
. .
Afzal Guru, a surrendered terrorist, was arrested the next day and declared the mastermind of the Parliament attack. He was found guilty and was executed in 2013.

With Afzal Guru’s hanging, the Parliament attack case met its closure for the most people. But for some, that was not the logical end as the point-person named by Afzal Guru in connection with the Parliament attack case was never examined, his role never probed.

That point person was Davinder Singh, a deputy superintendent of police in Jammu and Kashmir. Afzal Guru had named him, first as the police officer who tortured him months before the Parliament attack, and then as the man who tasked him with the job of ferrying one Mohammad to Delhi days before December 13 incident. Mohammad was later identified as one of the terrorists who attacked Parliament and shot dead in retaliatory action.

Now, 18 years later, the Parliament attack case has practically reopened. Davinder Singh was arrested in Kashmir on Saturday, was caught red-handed ferrying two "wanted terrorists.

This is not only a huge embarrassment to the security establishment in Jammu and Kashmir and in New Delhi, but also exposes the fallacy of criminal investigation by Indian agencies and quick-fix approach of the government to bring closure of a serious issue in public eye.

 
. .



no Thanks



 
Last edited:
.
2008 attack is just like a dead horse for Pakistan. Pakistan will not able to change the history now.

Might Pakistani can believes that Pakistan-based banned militant group Lashkar-e-Taiba was not behind but does any other country supports to pakistan on this?

No doubt India succeeded in blaming Pakistan with all the media blitz within minutes of the Mumbai and Parliament attacks, this media bombardment is a part of the falsehood of false flag operation...

No denying the fact that India succeeded in her plan.

With a huge, huge flip side to it.
 
.
Indian govt behind parliament, Mumbai attacks, claims former CBI official


NEW DELHI: A member of a Special Investigating Team (SIT) of India's Central Bureau of Investigation had accused incumbent governments of "orchestrating" the terror attack on Indian Parliament and the 2008 Mumbai attacks, The Times of India reported on Sunday.

A former Indian home ministry officer submitted his declaration in the Supreme Court of India which said that he was told by a former member of the CBI-SIT team that both the terror attacks (Parliament and Mumbai) were staged "with the objective of strengthening the counter-terror legislation(sic)."

The affidavit also included reference to the attack on the Indian parliament in December 2001 which was followed by the controversial Prevention of Terrorism Act (Pota), and the 2008 Mumbai attacks which led to amendments in the Unlawful Activities Prevention Act (UAPA).

The revelations came during a hearing in the Indian Supreme Court regarding the killing of a 19-year-old Indian Muslim girl in India's Gujrat state in June 2004.

Indian police had claimed that Ishrat Jahan and three Muslim men, two of them alleged to be Pakistanis, were killed as they set off with a stash of arms and explosives to kill Gujarat Chief Minister Narendra Modi.

The murder plot was refuted by the victim's mother who had called for an investigation to take place on a federal level.


hindustani got nanga putanga yet again!:lol:
 
.
The Betrayal of India, wasn't wrote by a Pakistani.

No matter how much India being successful at that point of time to mobilize much of propaganda against Pakistan and luckily had the Nawaz Sharif/Geo here; the truth will eventually come out. What gets them lucky is that, there was no Arnab close to upper quarters in those times.

1616151179773.png


1616151729214.png
 
.
The Betrayal of India, wasn't wrote by a Pakistani.

No matter how much India being successful at that point of time to mobilize much of propaganda against Pakistan and luckily had the Nawaz Sharif/Geo here; the truth will eventually come out. What gets them lucky is that, there was no Arnab close to upper quarters in those times.

View attachment 725979

View attachment 725982


Why has not then Pakistan officially retracted its admission to the fact of the attackers' Pakistani origin?

Do you guys have a RAW operated government? Is RAW controlling Imran Khan,Nawaz Sharif and Zardari?
 
.
Why has not then Pakistan officially retracted its admission to the fact of the attackers' Pakistani origin?

Do you guys have a RAW operated government? Is RAW controlling Imran Khan,Nawaz Sharif and Zardari?
cuz we don't need to when your own government documents prove that he was indian!
Screenshot_20210319-041212_Samsung Internet.jpg
Screenshot_20210319-041153_Samsung Internet.jpg
 
.
Why has not then Pakistan officially retracted its admission to the fact of the attackers' Pakistani origin?

Do you guys have a RAW operated government? Is RAW controlling Imran Khan,Nawaz Sharif and Zardari?

The answer lies in the post that I shared above. These things will come to revelation once the order inhouse is established. I pray that we will see the day when comes to the light. I wouldn't doubt if Nawaz/Geo played hand in glove as revenge against P.A.
 
.
cuz we don't need to when your own government documents prove that he was indian!
View attachment 725986View attachment 725987
Already busted!
1616152827112.png


Read more at:
http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/...ofinterest&utm_medium=text&utm_campaign=cppst

Example - Even during work from home, I am presently working for two companies in India. As per the rule, I should have only one UAN number but eveything thing is possible. If I can cheat, then other people as well.

If you have only one UAN number then it would not be possible to work for two companies without informing to them because they can check the employment history.

1616152943933.png

1616152987762.png
 
Last edited:
.
Already busted!
View attachment 725989

Read more at:
http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/...ofinterest&utm_medium=text&utm_campaign=cppst

Example - Even during work from home, I am presently working for two companies in India. As per the rule, I should have only one UAN number but eveything thing is possible. If I can cheat, then other people as well.

If you have only one UAN number then it would not be possible to work for two companies without informing to them because they can check the employment history.

View attachment 725992
View attachment 725994
indian gov documents declared fake by indian gov officials exposes india as the banana republic as it is. Even more reason for Pakistan to disregard whatever india says & ignore it. If we take what india says seriously after this then even zimbabwe & tanzania would want us to take them seriously. run along now.
 
Last edited:
.
2008 attack is just like a dead horse for Pakistan. Pakistan will not be able to change the history now.

Pakistan is not interested in history, it is changing the present and future.


All these revelations are now coming from within India from people who held position of power and authority. Which suggest that within India, there is a desperation to change the history and narrative, before it blows on India face full on.
 
. .
Back
Top Bottom