Indian military massive STRATEGIC revamp For Quad

[Trango Towers]

your are in denile I see
you missed the carrier launch
you not aware nearly all.the destroyers and frigates are Indian built
you not aware of arihant and arighat nuke subs
did you know we have 200 dhruv helos in service today
we have thousands indian missles akash Brahmos nag
we have the awacs planes
now tejas even our own Astra,bvr

do I need to.embaress you more

Yes even tejas is 100 indigenous. Embarrassing...its a word Indians don't understand.

 

[lonelyman]

Yes even tejas is 100 indigenous. Embarrassing...its a word Indians don't understand.

Indians = Liars = Delusional

 

[Bilal9]

I love this guy man! haha @The Maverick

especially this line " indian to get leaner , meaner " even though I only agree with the meaner part but not too sure about the other...

Meaner is the easy part, comes with Indian military ration of burnt half-chapati and watery dhaal. Leaner will be tough to AAAcheeeev.

Look at their police too.

This is what Bollywood shows to be Indian cop

This is reality

 

[Bilal9]

good enough to stop Japan in ww2 at Burmese border
good enough to liberate east pakistan in 12 days taking 100000 pow from.pakistan army

India Fauj did not do jack in WW2. Mostly done by US and and Royal Airforce air-bases near current Bangladesh Eastern border - doing bombing runs deep into Burma. Air cover kept the Japanese from advancing. Some of those airports are still running and expanded. Dhaka had B-25 Mitchells in a contingent and CXB had P-47 thunderbolt squadrons.

And the less said about 1971 the better. You did not "liberate" jack. Muktis did 95% of the operations and laid down their lives, Indian troops and their generals walked in at the last minute in December to grab photo ops and take pictures with Niazi for 'surrender'. Your soldiers were also very good at looting industrial plants and infra - literally cleaned us out. Indian Army very good at thievery.

Your Shakha Chalaks gave you wrong "in-for-may-sun".

 

[Great Janjua]

War is fought from low end to high. if you cannot maintain average foot soldiers properly there is no way you can assure victory, lethality or even modernisation, not until the infantryman the bread and butter of the modern battlefield are not well equipped.

India is far from modernisation.

 

[Bilal9]

your are in denile I see
you missed the carrier launch
you not aware nearly all.the destroyers and frigates are Indian built
you not aware of arihant and arighat nuke subs
did you know we have 200 dhruv helos in service today
we have thousands indian missles akash Brahmos nag
we have the awacs planes
now tejas even our own Astra,bvr

do I need to.embaress you more

Guys leave this aging uneducated bhakt alone, look at his spelling and its clear he's typing from a cheap Indian feature phone. I feel kind of sad at his pathetic attempts.

Denile? missles? embaress?

I am "embaress"ed....

 

[Adonis]

1) your objective was to annex east pakistan not liberate it.
2) how many times do we have to tell you this old man? How could they be 100k pakistani soldiers as pow when there were fewer than 34k in total in the army in east pakistan?
3) we literally hold a part of siachen. Which btw well done for taking a barren desert of snow which claims god knows how many indian soldiers lives
4) retake kargil? That wouldve been the case had we not been in possesion of point 5353, bunker ridge, saddle ridge and aftab 1 today. Sad times. You didnt win that war
5) china... My goodness. Just wow

Brahmos is a discount copy of the p800 onyx.

Dhruv was made with assistance from Germany

I have nothing against here...just few questions

1) How?...Where I can get that information that India wanted to annex East Pakistan? Pakistani source or external?
2) Again...what does records say and what does world endorse...If our figures are right, why we do not raise it in international forums and get the records corrected?
3) We hold a part (strategically inferior to what Indians hold).....they hold most of it. It also took Pakistani soldiers's lives (Gyari avalanche??)
4) What does winning means...occupying land? They blamed us of deceit post Kargil, maligned our reputation internationally......cases like Kargil, and other within India/Kashmir...they were able to convince the world that we are the bad boys...I guess they achieved their objective.
5) It's due to their stand in Doklam and then Ladak that they got support and trust from Quad members and West in general as only one which ca stand against China in Asia....don't you agree?

Every weapon is either a copy of some previously developed system or is developed with the help of someone......Don't you think Chinese weapons are copy of US/Russian ones?...US/Russian weapon technologies were initially copied from Germany post WW2.

 

[lonelyman]

good enough to stop Japan in ww2 at Burmese border
good enough to liberate east pakistan in 12 days taking 100000 pow from.pakistan army
good enough to snatch saichen in 1984 and keep it for ever
and good enough to retake kargil
finally good enough to stop chinease ladakh and force their withdrawal.

bullshit, India ragtags did nothing jack shit in world war 2 to stop Japanese, that's done by Chinese soldiers aided by USA

that's why China is P5, not India

actually Indians want to ally with Japanese to throw out British

 

[Vapnope]

How?...Where I can get that information that India wanted to annex East Pakistan? Pakistani source or external?

You only need to read Indian sources to know that this was the plan all along. You don't train militants, provide them with weapons and intelligence for nothing. Manekshaw later accepted that this was the plan all along.

Again...what does records say and what does world endorse...If our figures are right, why we do not raise it in international forums and get the records corrected?

American secret papers from1969-72 put the number of forces at 55,000 at max in Nov 1971 it was originally 32,000 till May 1971. The detail is also available in Conflict and diplomacy by Jaswant Singh and SP Bhatia as well.

 

[Adonis]

1. You only need to read Indian sources to know that this was the plan all along. You don't train militants, provide them with weapons and intelligence for nothing. Manekshaw later accepted that this was the plan all along.

2. American secret papers from1969-72 put the number of forces at 55,000 at max in Nov 1971 it was originally 32,000 till May 1971. The detail is also available in Conflict and diplomacy by Jaswant Singh and SP Bhatia as well.

1. But training militants, providing them intelligence is not always used from the motive of annexing the land. US trained militants in Syria, Iraq...now in Afghanistan (ISIS).....Iran train militants in Palestine, Jordan....We trained militants and provided them intelligence in Kashmir/Indian Punjab.....motive was to destabilise the environment... I think this is what India did...trained Mukti-militants to destabilise East Pakistan....Not sure if Manekshaw accepted it as a plan...source?

2. Surrender happened on 16th Dec, 1971...all the dates provided by you are prior to the surrender....implying that the figures mentioned by "American secret papers" may not be authentic.

 

[The Maverick]

the topic was indian mitary revamp.
set up and ways to fight a,war even.more coordination with quad

this has ruffled a few pakistan feathers

 

[terry5]

indian to get leaner , meaner and more coordinated between indian 3 services AND Quad members

HAVE YOU NOTICED nearly all new purchases lst 20 years is western origin

France USA and Israel

like this ?
Indians have truly always been on another level

 

[ARMalik]

Just the usual Tree monkeys screaming again for bananas and berries.

 

[Englishman]

India has new technology that allows them to win any war. Its called bolywood.

Even if they loose more soldiers or land or jet fighters than the enemy, they will authorise the use of bolywood as a last resort. This will then reverse the effects of loosing the war.

 

[Kaleem.61]

good enough to liberate east pakistan in 12 days taking 100000 pow from.pakistan army

Someone on the record said there were only 26k+- soldiers (can share the link to video) covering all the state and you just participated in a winning situation. That was a shameful act to claim it's you who supported Bengal. Pak Army vs Almost whole Bengal vs Minnows coming in the end!!!!

I don't think you need to watch/listen how professional is your army.

Indian Principal: I have 400 student in school and none of them want to join army. You know why let me tell you! As in Kargil war you sent troops without training and shoes. Just that ganja d@g helped you!!

AN ARMY CRYING FOR FOOD, PAY, PENSION, TREATMENT AND EQUIPMENT DEFEATD US LOLOL!!!

Was that good? you super rich!!!