Indian Media Discloses Dismal Performance of SU-30MKI Fighters During Kashmir Skirmish

[TheSnakeEatingMarkhur]

no dismal perf.
IAF fighters were outnumbered (always the asset of the one who is attacking), PAF fired from too high distance AMRAAM without any efficience at the end. They just succeed in pushing back the few indians planes in the air, probably without full air to air wepons under the wings (because a wepons when outside a bay lost part of its life when flying).
And at the end a F16 was lost. Great achievement !

Lmao statement like these can only come after you are high..

Out numbered ? India had jets on ground in Srinagar air base yet india used Halwara to send Mig21 and Su30s poor planning of IAF doctrine or something else ?

PAFs strike package fired near the border as well as the protection package.. both Nandu and Su30 were shot down with in 2/3rd of the range of AMRAAM

And indian jets were pushed back by Amraams ? indian jets were pushed back due to one simple fact.. EW..their coms were jammed and they had to get back (nandu becahara)

Btw by saying Amraams were used to push india back you people yourself are proving that you lot are sh*t scared of Amraams And again if PAF used all the Amraams and engaged all locked targets IAF would have lost 9 jets not 2.. if was the EW which forced IAF to get back due to their coms being jammed..

And F16 propaganda is still in indian minds even after Abhijit Iyer Mitra trashing your own channels for this propaganda

 

[Yasser76]

no dismal perf.
IAF fighters were outnumbered (always the asset of the one who is attacking), PAF fired from too high distance AMRAAM without any efficience at the end. They just succeed in pushing back the few indians planes in the air, probably without full air to air wepons under the wings (because a wepons when outside a bay lost part of its life when flying).
And at the end a F16 was lost. Great achievement !

So an Air Force twice the size of the PAF attacked Pakistan without ensuring adequate numbers? A lack of planning no?

The fact that F-16 succeeded in pushing back SU-30s in order for Mirages and JF-17s to perform their strike missions does not make you think?

Literally no one outside a niche Indian Twitter following believes the F-16 fantasy, and even some of them are admitting it is BS.

 

[TheSnakeEatingMarkhur]

what about the, TEA IS FANTASTIC

jf17 should come with built in tea maker machine.

It has PL15 TeaMaker

 

[Trango Towers]

no dismal perf.
IAF fighters were outnumbered (always the asset of the one who is attacking), PAF fired from too high distance AMRAAM without any efficience at the end. They just succeed in pushing back the few indians planes in the air, probably without full air to air wepons under the wings (because a wepons when outside a bay lost part of its life when flying).
And at the end a F16 was lost. Great achievement !

Loooooool.

 

[Imran Khan]

no dismal perf.
IAF fighters were outnumbered (always the asset of the one who is attacking), PAF fired from too high distance AMRAAM without any efficience at the end. They just succeed in pushing back the few indians planes in the air, probably without full air to air wepons under the wings (because a wepons when outside a bay lost part of its life when flying).
And at the end a F16 was lost. Great achievement !

were you will fit mig-21 and MI-17 lives and property losses ?

 

[arjunk]

India in 5 years:
"IF we had 10000 F-22 Raptor with antimatter missiles then maybe the rejult would be different!!!"

 

[Trango Towers]

Lmao statement like these can only come after you are high..

Out numbered ? India had jets on ground in Srinagar air base yet india used Halwara to send Mig21 and Su30s poor planning of IAF doctrine or something else ?

PAFs strike package fired near the border as well as the protection package.. both Nandu and Su30 were shot down with in 2/3rd of the range of AMRAAM

And indian jets were pushed back by Amraams ? indian jets were pushed back due to one simple fact.. EW..their coms were jammed and they had to get back (nandu becahara)

Btw by saying Amraams were used to push india back you people yourself are proving that you lot are sh*t scared of Amraams And again if PAF used all the Amraams and engaged all locked targets IAF would have lost 9 jets not 2.. if was the EW which forced IAF to get back due to their coms being jammed..

And F16 propaganda is still in indian minds even after Abhijit Iyer Mitra trashing your own channels for this propaganda

Actually the IAF belived their own BS of invincibility. They didn't think Pakistan will respond. But imran Khan warned them that don't mess with us we will hit you back.
I am only disappointed that PAF pilots had 8 Indians in their sights and were not given the order to shoot. Had we done that followed by immediate strikes on their forqarx airfields and then say we want peace....DO you. It would have been so so good. Still I proud of our men and our PM

 

[alee92nawaz]

no dismal perf.
IAF fighters were outnumbered (always the asset of the one who is attacking), PAF fired from too high distance AMRAAM without any efficience at the end. They just succeed in pushing back the few indians planes in the air, probably without full air to air wepons under the wings (because a wepons when outside a bay lost part of its life when flying).
And at the end a F16 was lost. Great achievement !

Still sucking on that f-16 lolipop I see

 

[Trango Towers]

Su30 is a great machine..
In the hands of Indian f22 would be taken out by our k8 and mushawks

 

[TOPGUN]

no dismal perf.
IAF fighters were outnumbered (always the asset of the one who is attacking), PAF fired from too high distance AMRAAM without any efficience at the end. They just succeed in pushing back the few indians planes in the air, probably without full air to air wepons under the wings (because a wepons when outside a bay lost part of its life when flying).
And at the end a F16 was lost. Great achievement !

What ever you are smoking keep on at it, and keep your bollywood fantasy stories to your self lolz. We , india, and the world already knows what really took place lmao.

 

[Azadkashmir]

kill a crow, make tea and talk bout shooting down a plane which doesn't match the actual plane flown by pak and then say if we had newer planes.

 

[Ghost Hobbit]

nonsense.
a) Anyone with a working brain knows that if the fight is around Kashmir F 16 can fire AIM into our skies without entring and bring down a Sukhoi
b) So IAF asked Sukhoi not to stay out of their range and away from all battle areas
c) Abhi was also asked to not follow any jets into Pak but he lost track when he got too focused on the battle

The decision was to not create a military situation in Kashmir because when Art 370 was getting scrapped we didn't want Pak to get any spotlight. The last thing we wanted was world media saying 'situation tense- hughe military situation' when we scrap it.

Rest is just fantasy people like @Windjammer make up. We come in force, you will lose. Period.

The Mig-21 that was shot down was armed with air to air weapons. What makes you think other were not ?

The sukois were asked not to engage.

 

[Aslan]

no dismal perf.
IAF fighters were outnumbered (always the asset of the one who is attacking), PAF fired from too high distance AMRAAM without any efficience at the end. They just succeed in pushing back the few indians planes in the air, probably without full air to air wepons under the wings (because a wepons when outside a bay lost part of its life when flying).
And at the end a F16 was lost. Great achievement !

All PAF has to say about that is

siamo venuti
vedemmo
abbiamo vinto


Or as Julius Caesar said

Veni, vidi, vici

Rest is just a wet dream of an indian, what can we say.

 

[Ghost Hobbit]

All PAF has to say about that is

siamo venuti
vedemmo
abbiamo vinto


Or as Julius Caesar said

Veni, vidi, vici

Rest is just a wet dream of an indian, what can we say.

Delusions. You had victory in a battle we decided not to fight.

 

[Aslan]

Delusions. You had victory in a battle we decided not to fight.

That makes yall cowards, and nothing else.

Are you sure you want to stick with that narrative.