What's new

Indian flees dialogue court once again?

I can understand your concern, those are legitimate but over exaggerated.
In the world of diplomacy, its very much required that you make neighbours of your prospective rival as friends. China tries to do same with Indian neighbours, USA does same with russian and chinese neighbour. It is in that context that its must for India to gain good grounds with Pakistan neighbours so that when required we can use them to pressurize Pakistan. Secondly its been known that Pakistan in past has raised terrorists organisation in afganisthan on the name of jihad and now the same has gone out of control and is not only causing damage to pakistan but similarly they are potential danger to India. Hence to keep a check on them as well as to build a friendly image of India in Afganistan so that the hate towards pakistan doesnot spread towards India, its must that we do constructive work.


For this please contact your all weather friend China, it has better relation access to powerhouse inside burma to control this, as of now India doesnt have that deep relations, we are working on building the relations with Burma and hopefully might be able to help in resolving Rohingyas issues.



Unlike the pakistan thought process, we have a bigger threat on northern borders called China, which is nuclear state, much more powerfull and bigger than us and in order to safequard ourselves against them it was essential to have nuclear backup. India has moved way ahead in terms of building up its arm forces with keeping in pakistan in mind, we are more concern about meeting the challenges posed by china. As we know if we can build ourself to defend against china, then we are much more than capable to handle pakistan.

Siachen has been discussed to suns length, please open of siachen related threads to gain the understandings.


Tumhe naste per bulaya aur tum bolte ho mein to nasta tabhi karunga jab app mujhe sone bhi doge ...aare bhai naste per bulaya hai to nasta karo, baatein karo aur aapne ghar ja kar so jao.




Are bhai to aao na terrorism per baat karne, agar indian forces terrorism kar rahi hai to indian government se baat karoge ya huriyaat se? Thodi to akal lagao? Huriyaat se to phone per bhi tumhari baat ho sakti hai ...govt to govt level baat to ek protocol ke andar hoti hai ...usse kyo kharab kar rahe ho?

Hurriyat (Kashmir) is also a party according to UN resolution.
 
.
I can understand your concern, those are legitimate but over exaggerated.
In the world of diplomacy, its very much required that you make neighbours of your prospective rival as friends. China tries to do same with Indian neighbours, USA does same with russian and chinese neighbour. It is in that context that its must for India to gain good grounds with Pakistan neighbours so that when required we can use them to pressurize Pakistan. Secondly its been known that Pakistan in past has raised terrorists organisation in afganisthan on the name of jihad and now the same has gone out of control and is not only causing damage to pakistan but similarly they are potential danger to India. Hence to keep a check on them as well as to build a friendly image of India in Afganistan so that the hate towards pakistan doesnot spread towards India, its must that we do constructive work.


For this please contact your all weather friend China, it has better relation access to powerhouse inside burma to control this, as of now India doesnt have that deep relations, we are working on building the relations with Burma and hopefully might be able to help in resolving Rohingyas issues.



Unlike the pakistan thought process, we have a bigger threat on northern borders called China, which is nuclear state, much more powerfull and bigger than us and in order to safequard ourselves against them it was essential to have nuclear backup. India has moved way ahead in terms of building up its arm forces with keeping in pakistan in mind, we are more concern about meeting the challenges posed by china. As we know if we can build ourself to defend against china, then we are much more than capable to handle pakistan.

Siachen has been discussed to suns length, please open of siachen related threads to gain the understandings.


Tumhe naste per bulaya aur tum bolte ho mein to nasta tabhi karunga jab app mujhe sone bhi doge ...aare bhai naste per bulaya hai to nasta karo, baatein karo aur aapne ghar ja kar so jao.




Are bhai to aao na terrorism per baat karne, agar indian forces terrorism kar rahi hai to indian government se baat karoge ya huriyaat se? Thodi to akal lagao? Huriyaat se to phone per bhi tumhari baat ho sakti hai ...govt to govt level baat to ek protocol ke andar hoti hai ...usse kyo kharab kar rahe ho?
Or ham ne socha baat cheet se kuch honay wala to hayy hi ni to kyun na india ko harass hi karr liye jaye :)..
 
. .
Hurriyat (Kashmir) is also a party according to UN resolution.
Kashmir is no longer a disputed territory according to UN.update yourself.
and Kashmir is not Hurriyat janaab.
 
.
Do you know there is something called Shimla Agreement?

I also know there is a thing called UN

Kashmir is no longer a disputed territory according to UN.update yourself.
and Kashmir is not Hurriyat janaab.

I am not interested in Modi's defination of dispute ...... Kashmir is the only dispute .... And hurriyat represent Kashmiris.
 
. .
I also know there is a thing called UN



I am not interested in Modi's defination of dispute ...... Kashmir is the only dispute .... And hurriyat represent Kashmiris.
Your interest may be in hoors of paradise..which does not exist.Hurriyat Kashmiris...Kay Bol Raha hai...Nasha Kiya hai subhe subhe ...:crazy:
 
.
I also know there is a thing called UN

Can you quote where UN says word "Huriyat" as third party?

Clearly If you knew what the Shimla Agreement was you would not use them in such a context.

I am not sure which version of Shimla Agreement you read. Just quoting you the second point of the agreement
(ii) That the two countries are resolved to settle their differences by peaceful means through bilateral negotiations or by any other peaceful means mutually agreed upon between them. Pending the final settlement of any of the problems between the two countries, neither side shall unilaterally alter the situation and both shall prevent the organization, assistance or encouragement of any acts detrimental to the maintenance of peaceful and harmonious relations;
Source: Simla Agreement July 2, 1972

I hope this makes sense to you what it means.
 
.
Kashmir is no longer a disputed territory according to UN.update yourself.
and Kashmir is not Hurriyat janaab.
Exactly how does hurriyat represents kashmir , bcos they are lackeys of pakistan? Why not some blind donkey, shit... dog or croaking frog from kashmir ?
If they say hurriyat has more hold over ppl in kashmir then , IA has strangle hold they should be consulted as well.
 
.
Pakistan has proved again it cannot be trusted even on the written agreements which was signed by their own PM. Their government or even NSA does not honor the international agreement. It has given India enough reason to rethink on all the agreements signed with Paksitan, as Pakistan can backtrack on these agreements on any time. There is time to not consider the siachin, sir creek, canal, etc etc with Pakistan. Lets stick to two point agenda. Terrorism in all from erupting out of Pakistan and damaging India;s interest (including embassies attacks in Afghanistan) and bringing peace in the region. If pakistan is willing to work on these two points along with India then only talks should happen..
 
.
viny ji lagta hai appne pory post parhy nahy... talks se backtrack India ne kya he, Pakistan ne nahy..

Appke liye hi Ministry of External Affairs ne press conference ka video youtube per share kiya hai. Jara gaur se dekhiye sayad sachai samaj mein aa jaye..

 
.
Back
Top Bottom