Well well well, how can I dispute such an eloquently put argument? Such nobility of though, such grandeur of expression, such a logically rigorous exposition. " **** off, what I say is known to everybody, what everybody has admitted cannot be proved and didn't happen."
Now I have to reconsider my previous advice to you. Before enrolling in a first year undergrad course, you might want to take AP credits or GED equivalent courses first. I mean, if this is how you argue your point in a freshman class, your tuition fees would be a colossal waste. AP or GED will help you attain enough abilities to get into first year of college.
I feel kinda bad now - I mean it is fun to see somebody frothing at me when he has nothing substantial left to say, but sometimes I wonder if I should be gracious even under such circumstances. Your ignorance and rudeness may not be your fault, it could be a result of your upbringing. So, with no hard feelings, I'll urge you to take my advice on post HS courses.
Nope - India is a democracy because democratic political institutions have flourished there since independence (except a brief period of emergency rule). Mob rule can and does happen anywhere - dictatorships or democracies or totalitarian states or monarchies. That will not make them a democracy.
Anyway, I can't spend much time educating you - my time would be better spent doing what I do in real life.
Actually every citizen has equal rights in India, and is equal before law. Yes, religious inspired violence has happened, but that does not mean that India doesn't recognize the rights of minorities. Violence has happened against "baniya yindoos" as well, btw. Not because they don't have rights, but because many people harbour hatred in their hearts.
Are you saying that the mob assembled there first and then somebody branded him an illegal immigrant, which caused the mob to enter a state of frenzy? By all accounts, malicious rumours of him being an illegal Bangladeshi had been circulating the social media before the incident happened.
I'm not fully aware of the situation, but from what I have heard, yes it is real. It doesn't matter at all to my point, which I will repeat below. So let's agree that it is real, and not argue over that.
Could be the birth rate or migration from W Bengal, but as I said above, let's just agree that it is due to illegal Bangladeshi immigration alone.
Oh come on, do I really need to answer that? How is this any different from asking why you shouldn't judge every muslim to be a terrorist, because most terrorist groups today are adherents of that religion? Even if every terrorist is a muslim (they aren't, btw), does it mean that every muslim is a terrorist?
If A is a subset of B, it does not follow that B is a subset of A, unless A and B are equal sets.
Muslims don't have the burden of proof to show that they are not terrorists - and similarly, Bengali speaking muslims do not have the burden of proof to show that they are not Bangladeshis.
How is that related to this incident? Was this man disrupting the process of NRC upgradation? No, he was in jail because a girl made an accusation of rape against him. That's it. Neither was this man a Bangladeshi, nor was he disrupting any NRC upgradation.
BTW, how do you want to be treated if an allegation of rape is made against you? Would you want to be taken to a court where you can defend your innocence, or would you want to be stripped and tortured by thousands of maniacs, and your body hung on a pole?
Remember, anybody can be the victim of a frenzied mob. If something like that happens to you, would you want a discussion of Nepali hindus producing cannabis or something tangential like that?
Again, you are missing the point when you are asking about the stance regarding illegal Bangladeshi immigrants - the fact of the matter is that the victim here was neither illegal, nor Bangladeshi. It makes as much sense to ask this question, as to ask about any illegal activities of Nepali hindus when an Indian hindu is a victim of violence.
The very fact that you talk about Bangladeshis and illegals in this thread, gives me the impression that you don't consider muslims (especially Bengali muslims) as equal citizens, but as a foreign group that you are hesitantly tolerating. Put yourself in a muslim Indian's shoe and think abut it, if you want to understand why this entire discourse would make her feel like a second class citizen.
.
. Do not know if that constitutes as trolling. This is a fallout of the media's attempt to inflame passion in India against "Hindu culture." The mob action to follow was to be expected in such a scenario. That is the prevalent view about this incident across India. Perhaps majority of India is trolling when it holds that view.
