India urged to take up Tibet issue before UN

[Arya Desa]

haha.We judge a social system good or not ,by what it brings to their people ,not by what its name is.Obviously,your transcript is not good enough to allow your proud.
maybe you are middle-upper class in your country and have the money to bs here ,but have you ever forgotten how many people in your country cann't afford a PC or even a TV set now 13th year of 21th centary ? your country is much richer than us in 1947 when you got independence and your industrial output was many times of ours.

Don't compare your country with ours. China has a supermajority ethnicity. We have no such majority. We are a nation of minorities all with vastly different cultures, languages and ideas. So forgive us if we cannot grow in a uniform direction.

 

[djsjs]

Don't compare your country with ours. China has a supermajority ethnicity. We have no such majority. We are a nation of minorities all with vastly different cultures, languages and ideas. So forgive us if we cannot grow in a uniform direction.

sorry i didn't want to say something that might hurt your feelings. but there are always some bad guys who is keeping bs makes me angry.
i'm not here to make enemies,and i don't mind to make friends with some pilote ,well educated indians .

 

[Arya Desa]

sorry i didn't want to say something that might hurt your feelings. but there are always some bad guys who is keeping bs makes me angry.
i'm not here to make enemies,and i don't mind to make friends with some pilote ,well educated indians .

I do understand words get lost in translation and someone reading it may misinterpret. Please do not be of the mindset that if someone insults you, you must insult their whole society.

 

[Kyusuibu Honbu]

Taiwan is a successful Chinese democracy and a democracy ht as brought prosperity to its people. India is an example of why a country should not adopt democracy as its majority are not ready to be responsible stakeholders of its national affairs.

The bolded parts contradict each other, almost as if you consider democracy a luxury of the rich nations

 

[faithfulguy]

The bolded parts contradict each other, almost as if you consider democracy a luxury of the rich nations

Nope, democracy should be adopted for countries that has the majority of the population that are stake holders for the success of the country. If the majority of the people are too poor to care about anything except feeding themselves for the next meal, than its clear that democracy would not work in that particular country. That people of that country should worry about basic living needs than worry about the country. People should first worry about themselves, and then their families, and then their communities and finally, their country. People that cannot take care of themselves or their families has no time to worry about the affairs of their countries. Their only participation in the democratic government would be to take care of the short term needs of themselves or their families. India is an example of when democracy is breaking down the country. US is an example of a successful democracy. Taiwan is marching toward a successful democracy as well.

Don't compare your country with ours. China has a supermajority ethnicity. We have no such majority. We are a nation of minorities all with vastly different cultures, languages and ideas. So forgive us if we cannot grow in a uniform direction.

Its scary when you consider each sub caste as a nationality and people. India should break down the barriers of caste if it wish to become a successful nation.

 

[beijingwalker]

world changes with time,history tells us that nothing can stay right for ever.I think China now found a better system than that of the west.

Soros: China has better functioning government than U.S. | FP Passport

Soros: China has better functioning government than U.S.

"There is a really remarkable, rapid shift of power and influence from the United States to China," Mr. Soros said, likening the U.S.'s decline to that of the U.K. after the Second World War.

Because global economic power is shifting, Mr. Soros said China needs to change its focus. "China has risen very rapidly by looking out for its own interests," he said. "They have now got to accept responsibility for world order and the interests of other people as well."

Mr. Soros even went so far as to say that at times China wields more power than the U.S. because of the political gridlock in Washington. "Today China has not only a more vigorous economy, but actually a better functioning government than the United States," he said, a hard statement for him to make because he spent much of his life donating to anti-communist groups in Eastern Europe.

 

[faithfulguy]

world changes with time,history tells us that nothing can stay right for ever.I think China now found a better system than that of the west.

Soros: China has better functioning government than U.S. | FP Passport

Do not trust this guy who worked with Nazis to terminate his own Jewish people.

 

[Kyusuibu Honbu]

Nope, democracy should be adopted for countries that has the majority of the population that are stake holders for the success of the country. If the majority of the people are too poor to care about anything except feeding themselves for the next meal, than its clear that democracy would not work in that particular country. That people of that country should worry about basic living needs than worry about the country. People should first worry about themselves, and then their families, and then their communities and finally, their country. People that cannot take care of themselves or their families has no time to worry about the affairs of their countries. Their only participation in the democratic government would be to take care of the short term needs of themselves or their families.

Appreciate your logic, however the above doesn't seem to be practical in the sub continent.

Sri Lanka, India and Bangladesh have developed over the years since Independence under a democratic Govt.

The nations which have been for larger part of their independent history non-Democratic like Pakistan, Nepal, Burma remain significantly lower than democratic nations in subcontinent in terms of HDI.

List of countries by Human Development Index - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Of course Bangladesh is lower than Pakistan, but then Bangladesh had obtained its independence in 1971 and has done in certain indicators better than India or Pakistan.

India is an example of when democracy is breaking down the country. US is an example of a successful democracy. Taiwan is marching toward a successful democracy as well.

How can you justify that? how can you sow Integrity of India has gotten worse or better since independence?

 

[Jackdaws]

Don't Laugh so soon...what will happen it we divert all this water to Xinjiang.? here to answer your question about Ganges tributary rivers: Ghanghara and Kosi source are from China, and the head river source is just near China boundary, if we manage to block all melting ices at the head rivier of Ganges, you will have to learn to count each drop of water.

Of course you can divert it. The point is not that you can, the point is that does your Politburo have the balls to piss off India by doing this? I doubt it - you will not do any such thing. Let's see your Politburo do it...

 

[bronxbull]

If they divert it,then we ll go and divert everything that flows into pakistan.

 

[Kiss_of_the_Dragon]

Of course you can divert it. The point is not that you can, the point is that does your Politburo have the balls to piss off India by doing this? I doubt it - you will not do any such thing. Let's see your Politburo do it...

have you read the other article about Divert water from Tibet to Xinjiang??? those people are working for the gorverment..they're not simple internet blogger...I think they're serious about this idea. As for most project, first you need Idea, intention then planning after that execution. I'm pretty sure we're at the last two phases. If we didn't sign the water treaty, we have no obligation toward India...so only future will tell if we have the ball or not.

If they divert it,then we ll go and divert everything that flows into pakistan.

Then you will have to deal with Pakistan...as long as we do nothing to harm Pakistan interest.

 

[bronxbull]

at that point there is nothing to deal,we all nuke each other.

 

[Kiss_of_the_Dragon]

at that point there is nothing to deal,we all nuke each other.

Lol Indians like to talk nuke with China.

 

[Echo_419]

Don't Laugh so soon...what will happen it we divert all this water to Xinjiang.? here to answer your question about Ganges tributary rivers: Ghanghara and Kosi source are from China, and the head river source is just near China boundary, if we manage to block all melting ices at the head rivier of Ganges, you will have to learn to count each drop of water.

sir you seems to have a mental problem you wanna kill millions of folks there by diverting water
looking at your progress [which is quite impressive i might add] your govt does not have balls do divert water to be frank they might develop some in a decade but not now till then india will be very strong nuclear power you take us down we will pull you with us
peace out

 

[Kiss_of_the_Dragon]

sir you seems to have a mental problem you wanna kill millions of folks there by diverting water
looking at your progress [which is quite impressive i might add] your govt does not have balls do divert water to be frank they might develop some in a decade but not now till then india will be very strong nuclear power you take us down we will pull you with us peace out

I dont have mental problem: don't you guys do the same with pakistan and BD with Indus and Brahmaputra, alway threatening them with water that you have controlled, I just learned this from your Indians folks. Luckyly that India had not controlled Tibet otherwise you will do the same with China.

...Of course I'm not silly enought to have a death wish of millions Indians, I might wish that about Japaneses but certainly not Indians. we just talk about geopolitical leverage..and you guys alway instigate by saying when Chinese has the ball to do so..then I just prove that pontentially we can.