What's new

India to surrender aid if UK decides to cut it: Pranab

sunny001

BANNED
Joined
Jul 30, 2010
Messages
276
Reaction score
0
India to surrender aid if UK decides to cut it: Pranab

NEW DELHI: India will prefer to voluntarily surrender the grant it receives from United Kingdom if the British government decided on cutting it, Finance Minister Pranab Mukherjee told Rajya Sabha today.

He said during Question Hour that New Delhi has "made it clear" to the Cameron administration that "we will voluntarily surrender" aid should UK decide to cut it.

India's stand was made clear during the recent visit of British Prime Minister and UK government was asked to give it prior information on any decision to cut the aid. "We don't require the aid... we will voluntarily surrender it," he said.

The new government in the United Kingdom has commissioned a review of each of their bilateral aid programmes being implemented by the Department for International Development (DFID) with recipient countries globally to determine where UK resources are most needed.

"The status/findings of the review of the UK government has not yet been communicated," he said.

The UK aid is being received for health, education and poverty alleviation programmes in Andhra Pradesh, West Bengal, Orissa, Bihar and Madhya Pradesh.

Mukherjee said the external assistance forms just 0.4 per cent of India's GDP and its share in the total budgetary expenditure on developmental schemes has gone down to 2.5 per cent from 3.4 per cent.

"It is peanuts in our total development expenditure," he said.


The government, he said, has inbuilt appraisal mechanism to look into complaints about misuse or diversion of the grants from multilateral agencies or bilateral aid.
 
. .
Thts the fitting reply! Saw a uk article making big fuss about aid

The Brits have been crying about it for quite sometime especially the BNP bunch.

When we did moon mission.

When a report was released that India's expenditure on space was more than that of UK's.

Some of them even think that their aid was used by India for its military,space,Jaguar and Land-rover purchases , computers in call centers :lol:

These aid programs have never been of any significance in development whether its Africa or rest of the world.In fact they indirectly promote corruption.The sooner the Western Govts realize this the better.
 
.
The Brits have been crying about it for quite sometime especially the BNP bunch.

When we did moon mission.

When a report was released that India's expenditure on space was more than that of UK's.

Some of them even think that their aid was used by India for its military,space,Jaguar and Land-rover purchases , computers in call centers :lol:

These aid programs have never been of any significance in development whether its Africa or rest of the world.In fact they indirectly promote corruption.The sooner the Western Govts realize this the better.

Considering how much they looted from us, they should give us aid (interest) for next 1000 years. Unfortunately, people have short memory.
 
.
He said during Question Hour that New Delhi has "made it clear" to the Cameron administration that "we will voluntarily surrender" aid should UK decide to cut it.

I'm confused how do you voluntarily surrender what will be cut?
 
. . .
brother ...
u dont have to refer to him like that ... that might have been a genuine question ....

:coffee:

It was. If they reduce aid, how do you not surrender it? Doesn't it just you mean that you won't appeal the decision?

I am confused by the wording of the article.
 
.
It was. If they reduce aid, how do you not surrender it? Doesn't it just you mean that you won't appeal the decision?

I am confused by the wording of the article.

suppose they are giving us a aid of 100..now they reduce it to 80. in that case we will surrender the wholw 80
 
.
Ok see ...wat it means is ....say as an example

India today was recieveing 4 Billion USD as Aid and UK said now we will give 2 Billion USD only .WE will say thanks but no thanks .we will not need ur 2 BIllion ...

Thats all


:coffee:
 
.
Ok see ...wat it means is ....say as an example

India today was recieveing 4 Billion USD as Aid and UK said now we will give 2 Billion USD only .WE will say thanks but no thanks .we will not need ur 2 BIllion ...

Thats all


:coffee:

Thanks for the clarification. I thought cutting it meant cutting the whole thing from the new budget.

Though the wisdom of refusing 80 billion dollars for the poor in return for the pride of the rich is another thing.
 
.
what's the status with the $9.3b in anti-poverty loan assistance from World Bank?
 
.
It was. If they reduce aid, how do you not surrender it? Doesn't it just you mean that you won't appeal the decision?

I am confused by the wording of the article.

No, I think what article was trying to say is if British indeed decide to cut the aid, if they let us know India would voluntarily do it, so to avoid any uncomfortability on both sides. That's my understanding.
 
Last edited:
.
Considering how much they looted from us, they should give us aid (interest) for next 1000 years. Unfortunately, people have short memory.

Such a mentality only makes us more and more associated with colonial era and keeps us stuck in a time warp.They looted us only because we let them by being so naive.Its true poverty in South Asia is British colonial legacy,but the responsibility and blame is ours as we didn't improve the situation much.If Britain hands over artifacts and items of historical significance and which are part of our heritage as compensation then its ok.
 
.
Thanks for the clarification. I thought cutting it meant cutting the whole thing from the new budget.

Though the wisdom of refusing 80 billion dollars for the poor in return for the pride of the rich is another thing.

What 80 billion dollars? External assistance ( assistance from all other countries not just Britain) is 4.8 billion dollars (0.4% of 1.2 trillion). UK as far as I know provides us with about 900 million to 1.2 billion every year. I gave you a range because I am not sure of exact number.

How did you come up with 80 billion ?
 
.
Back
Top Bottom