What's new

India-Thailand difference delaying FTA under BIMSTEC

bluesky

ELITE MEMBER
Joined
Jun 14, 2016
Messages
16,515
Reaction score
-4
Country
Bangladesh
Location
Japan
07 Aug 2017, 12:53:05
India-Thailand difference delaying FTA under BIMSTEC


Difference between India and Thailand over market access is one of the main reasons why the FTA under BIMSTEC remained stalled during last couple of years.

While India has demanded easing of rules for its professionals, Thailand has asked for relaxation in the foreign investment rules in multibrand retail trade for its retailers.

Moreover, Bangladesh and Sri Lanka are pushing for the entry of China into the grouping, which is technically not possible at this stage, albeit it can join BIMSTEC as ‘observer.’

Sources said the major difference in BIMSTEC FTA is that India wants to negotiate the pact afresh and not what was agreed in 2004, when the FTA framework was signed, whereas all other member countries want to maintain status quo.

India is aggressively pushing for the conclusion of Free Trade Agreement (FTA) under the Bay of Bengal Initiative for Multi-Sectoral Technical and Economic Cooperation (BIMSTEC) by November during its Summit meeting.

The main goal of India is boosting regional trade through FTA bypassing Pakistan, according to a report published in http://www.thehindubusinessline.com.

Conclusion of the FTA in goods, the talks for which were launched in 2004, will be one of the topmost agenda items of External Affairs Minister Sushma Swaraj during the upcoming BIMSTEC Foreign Ministers’ Meeting that is scheduled to be held in Nepal on August 10-11, according to sources.

However, though the government is keen on concluding the FTA, a lot of hurdles need to be crossed before all members agree to sign the pact, the primary reason being disagreement between India and Thailand over market access for professionals, duty cuts on traded goods and policy relaxation, sources told Businessline.

“BIMSTEC needs to produce a few visible results or successes in the short term. Concluding the protracted negotiations for a Free Trade Agreement in goods, and later, services, and investment, is the way forward. Without an appropriate FTA, the grouping will continue to be perceived as an empty shell,” said Rajiv Bhatia, former Indian Ambassador to Myanmar, now Distinguished Fellow at Gateway House, a Mumbai-based foreign policy think-tank.

The BIMSTEC Trade Negotiating Committee last met in 2015 despite the leaders push to expedite it in the last summit held in October 2016.

“BIMSTEC FTA should be negotiated quickly and can be concluded if the political will is there. In non-economic front it has moved fast and same can be followed in the FTA process,” said Prabir De, Professor and Coordinator of ASEAN-India Centre, Research and Information System for Developing Countries.

This year the BIMSTEC – India, Thailand, Mynamar, Nepal, Bangladesh, Sri Lanka, Bhutan – will complete 20 years since it was established. As a result, India wants the FTA to be concluded this year to assert its “relevance” especially at a time when the government when the SAARC is in doldrums and India wants to bypass Pakistan in all its sub-regional economic and non-economic arrangements, sources added.

The criticality to sign the deal is multi-fold for India. Firstly, an FTA will undoubtedly boost the ‘Look East’ policy, which is one of key aspects of Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s foreign policy, thereby contributing to the development of the vulnerable north-eastern region.

Secondly, this will also serve India’s larger purpose of sideline Pakistan.

In 2004, it also decided that first the goods pact will be signed and that it will followed by subsequent pacts in services and investment and a comprehensive trade agreement will be signed.
 
.
SAARC has become almost non-functional. This is perhaps why the countries together are trying to build a plausible platform BIMSTEC with the participation of many countries in the region. I think, this platform suits BD because of its location in between a big India and a growing Thailand and Myanmar. I have very little knowledge about BIMSTEC. Hope, someone knowledgeable will shed light on it.
 
. .
Moreover, Bangladesh and Sri Lanka are pushing for the entry of China into the grouping
BIMSTEC Bay of Bengal Initiative for Multi-Sectoral Technical and Economic Cooperation. Where is China in Bay of Bangal?
While India has demanded easing of rules for its professionals, Thailand has asked for relaxation in the foreign investment rules in multibrand retail trade for its retailers.
Reasonable demand.
 
.
any trade agreement with indian is futile, one can undertake on own peril. Bangladesh, SriLanka, Nepal and even EU, US learned it over years. Agreement excluding india would work better and without much conflict.
 
.
any trade agreement with indian is futile, one can undertake on own peril. Bangladesh, SriLanka, Nepal and even EU, US learned it over years. Agreement excluding india would work better and without much conflict.

Do not you think that India is working as the glue to BIMSTEC? It is a pivotal country in BIMSTEC. Without India it is just not possible to lay a good foundation for any organization in our zone. The talk is about FTA and not about India itself. Since trade and businesses are involved it must be preceded by a mutually agreed FTA agreement by all the countries. FTA agreement will give a boost to the evolving of trading.
 
.
I guess the differences are minor.
 
.
Do not you think that India is working as the glue to BIMSTEC? It is a pivotal country in BIMSTEC. Without India it is just not possible to lay a good foundation for any organization in our zone. The talk is about FTA and not about India itself. Since trade and businesses are involved it must be preceded by a mutually agreed FTA agreement by all the countries. FTA agreement will give a boost to the evolving of trading.

your indian dalali came right out, you could not resist speaking for your master. It is just so easy to expose your true malaun nature. Bilateral or ASEAN plus FTA is very much possible with Thailand SrLanka and Myanmar. In fact Bangladesh already pursuing FTA with SriLanka. No one need to be indian slave like you.
 
.
BIMSTEC Bay of Bengal Initiative for Multi-Sectoral Technical and Economic Cooperation. Where is China in Bay of Bangal?

Didn't China try to sneak into South Asian Association for Regional Cooperation (SAARC) even though it is an east Asian nation?
 
.
your indian dalali came right out, you could not resist speaking for your master. It is just so easy to expose your true malaun nature. Bilateral or ASEAN plus FTA is very much possible with Thailand SrLanka and Myanmar. In fact Bangladesh already pursuing FTA with SriLanka. No one need to be indian slave like you.
Tibro andolon koren
 
.
your indian dalali came right out, you could not resist speaking for your master. It is just so easy to expose your true malaun nature. Bilateral or ASEAN plus FTA is very much possible with Thailand SrLanka and Myanmar. In fact Bangladesh already pursuing FTA with SriLanka. No one need to be indian slave like you.

You are a genius. I am happy that you have again exposed me. Usually you are a pro-Indian. But, for some ulterior motive you are talking against India now. Bilateral FTA is different from the FTA under BIMSTEC, and it is a long process to sit and talk with all the member individual country one by one. So, a single platform is better. Do not you agree with it?

I do not know if BD favors this organization or not, because OBOR has come to the front. But, if it is in BIMSTEC, then it must work for the FTA among all the member countries under this framework. OBOR should not be equated with BIMSTEC. We can participate in both. Any way, please try to look after the interest of BD.
 
Last edited:
.
SAARC has become almost non-functional. This is perhaps why the countries together are trying to build a plausible platform BIMSTEC with the participation of many countries in the region. I think, this platform suits BD because of its location in between a big India and a growing Thailand and Myanmar. I have very little knowledge about BIMSTEC. Hope, someone knowledgeable will shed light on it.

BIMSTEC is more dsyfunctional than SAARC
It seems like a random grouping of countries with nothing in common
any economic pact is a bonus for everyone
 
.
BIMSTEC is more dsyfunctional than SAARC
It seems like a random grouping of countries with nothing in common
any economic pact is a bonus for everyone
Yes, it seems to be dysfunctional to me, too, though I was expecting it to be a success.
 
. . .

Pakistan Defence Latest Posts

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom