What's new

India spends $6 BILLION on Russian missiles – yet UK pays them £100 MILLION in foreign aid

BHarwana

MODERATOR
Joined
Sep 24, 2016
Messages
24,827
Reaction score
20
Country
Pakistan
Location
Pakistan
INDIA is set to spend almost $6BILLION on cutting-edge S-400 air missile defence systems from Russia - despite the UK paying the heavily poverty-stricken country more than £100 million in foreign aid each year.

Defence Minister Normal Sitharaman has forwarded the deal for the purchase of five S-400 units to the finance ministry and Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s office for Government approval. The cost equates to £4.3 billion.

The S-400 Triumf can engage with targets at a range of up to 40km and ballistic missiles up to 60km away.

It can use at least four interceptor missile types - one S-400 division can engage up to 36 targets simultaneously.

A source at the Defence Acquisitions Council (DAC) told the Times of India: “The S-400 procurement case will now go to the finance ministry for clearance and the PM-led Cabinet Committee on Security for the final nod.

“The country’s top political leadership will have to take a call on when the actual contract can be inked.”

India has a growing battery of more than 130 Indian-built nuclear warheads, with the country expected to outstrip the UK’s 215-strong nuclear deterrent in the next decade.

As of the end of 2017, India’s nuclear budget almost exactly matched the UK’s at around £5 billion.

Yet confusingly, the country remains heavily poverty-stricken, with the UK paying more than £100 million of its £13 billion aid budget to India each year.

Last month, it was revealed that India has the world’s second largest poor population behind Nigeria.

According to figures from World Poverty Clock, 73 million Indian people or 5.3 percent of the total population still live in “extreme poverty” - classed as a person living on less than $1.90 a day.

The multi-billion pound purchase of the S-400 has also come under strong opposition from the US.

The deal, provisionally discussed in a summit between Mr Modi and Russian President Vladimir Putin in October 2016, has raised questions over the possible imposition of US sanctions, which aim to deter nations from buying Russian weapons.

US armed services committee chairman Mac Thornberry said in May: “The acquisition of this technology will limit, I am afraid, the degree with which the United States will feel comfortable in bringing additional technology into whatever country we are talking about.”

Mr Thornberry added that there is also concern that “any country that acquires the system will complicate the ability of interoperability” with US forces.



https://www.express.co.uk/news/worl...missile-system-nuclear-arsenal-uk-foreign-aid
 
. . . . .
Pakistan is getting aid from China
It is loan and even USA is under Chinese loan.

It is Shame UK give India Aid and India spends that money on buying weapons from UK's enemy instead of spending on the betterment of it's population.
 
. .
It is loan and even USA is under Chinese loan.

It is Shame UK give India Aid and India spends that money on buying weapons from UK's enemy instead of spending on the betterment of it's population.
It's not a loan, atleast most of Chinese projects in Pakistan ain't.
They try to advance your economy and by that making a greater enemy to India
 
.
It's not a loan, atleast most of Chinese projects in Pakistan ain't.
They try to advance your economy and by that making a greater enemy to India

My friend NATO is at war with Russia and India is Taking Aid from a NATO member and Giving money to Russia instead of Buying weapons from NATO and USA. If India has money for buying missile why is it taking Aid and not spending that $6 billion money on it's population in poverty?

That is hard earned money of UK Tax payers and that is being spent on strengthening UK's enemies.
 
. .
Is India asking for aid from UK or is UK giving aid to India? This says much about UK than India.

Nevertheless, what fool would turn down free money? :enjoy:
 
.
INDIA is set to spend almost $6BILLION on cutting-edge S-400 air missile defence systems from Russia - despite the UK paying the heavily poverty-stricken country more than £100 million in foreign aid each year.

Defence Minister Normal Sitharaman has forwarded the deal for the purchase of five S-400 units to the finance ministry and Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s office for Government approval. The cost equates to £4.3 billion.

The S-400 Triumf can engage with targets at a range of up to 40km and ballistic missiles up to 60km away.

It can use at least four interceptor missile types - one S-400 division can engage up to 36 targets simultaneously.

A source at the Defence Acquisitions Council (DAC) told the Times of India: “The S-400 procurement case will now go to the finance ministry for clearance and the PM-led Cabinet Committee on Security for the final nod.

“The country’s top political leadership will have to take a call on when the actual contract can be inked.”

India has a growing battery of more than 130 Indian-built nuclear warheads, with the country expected to outstrip the UK’s 215-strong nuclear deterrent in the next decade.

As of the end of 2017, India’s nuclear budget almost exactly matched the UK’s at around £5 billion.

Yet confusingly, the country remains heavily poverty-stricken, with the UK paying more than £100 million of its £13 billion aid budget to India each year.

Last month, it was revealed that India has the world’s second largest poor population behind Nigeria.

According to figures from World Poverty Clock, 73 million Indian people or 5.3 percent of the total population still live in “extreme poverty” - classed as a person living on less than $1.90 a day.

The multi-billion pound purchase of the S-400 has also come under strong opposition from the US.

The deal, provisionally discussed in a summit between Mr Modi and Russian President Vladimir Putin in October 2016, has raised questions over the possible imposition of US sanctions, which aim to deter nations from buying Russian weapons.

US armed services committee chairman Mac Thornberry said in May: “The acquisition of this technology will limit, I am afraid, the degree with which the United States will feel comfortable in bringing additional technology into whatever country we are talking about.”

Mr Thornberry added that there is also concern that “any country that acquires the system will complicate the ability of interoperability” with US forces.



https://www.express.co.uk/news/worl...missile-system-nuclear-arsenal-uk-foreign-aid

they don't give it to the govt. directly but through NGOs. Indian govt. has nothing to do with it. If someone want to donate for some cause then it is for the individual or in this case the UK govt. to make a call if their tax money is being well spent. There was debate about it and their MPs want to continue with the aid because it is helpful and it is meaningful to the recipient. I believe this is the only aid that India is still getting from any country. Soon it will be history as we grow in economic stature.

In fact we give out more aid than we receive. Our aid to other countries is twice than what we receive. We primarily help out our neighbours like Bhutan, Sri Lanka, Afghanistan and Bangladesh.

The largest provider of aid to India in 2015-16 was the Global Fund, the international financing organisation that gives aid to fight HIV/AIDS, Tuberculosis, Malaria and other diseases that provided Rs 1477.72 crore. The second largest donor is the European Union. Interestingly, the United Kingdom, the former colonial rulers of India have the balance sheet in negative for the year 2016-17.

http://www.newindianexpress.com/nat...-gives-more-aid-than-it-receives-1584604.html
 
.
they don't give it to the govt. directly but through NGOs. Indian govt. has nothing to do with it. If someone want to donate for some cause then it is for the individual or in this case the UK govt. to make a call if their tax money is being well spent. There was debate about it and their MPs want to continue with the aid because it is helpful and it is meaningful to the recipient. I believe this is the only aid that India is still getting from any country. Soon it will be history as we grow in economic stature.

In fact we give out more aid than we receive. Our aid to other countries is twice than what we receive. We primarily help out our neighbours like Bhutan, Sri Lanka, Afghanistan and Bangladesh.

http://www.newindianexpress.com/nat...-gives-more-aid-than-it-receives-1584604.html

This Govt Aid the Aid to NGOs is different.

this lie was exposed by guardian long time back last year.

https://www.theguardian.com/global-...ays-department-international-development-dfid
 
.
My friend NATO is at war with Russia and India is Taking Aid from a NATO member and Giving money to Russia instead of Buying weapons from NATO and USA. If India has money for buying missile why is it taking Aid and not spending that $6 billion money on it's population in poverty?

That is hard earned money of UK Tax payers and that is being spent on strengthening UK's enemies.
They're giving small sum of money to secure their interests in India.
U.S does it, Russia does it,China does it and so are many other countries
 
.
They're giving small sum of money to secure their interests in India.
U.S does it, Russia does it,China does it and so are many other countries

lol don't explain it to me not my money. Tell that to the people of UK why their Tax money is going into the pockets of their enemies man.
 
.

Latest posts

Back
Top Bottom