What's new

India, Pakistan were indeed very close to peace deal, says Dr Manmohan Singh

Srinivas

ELITE MEMBER
Joined
Sep 20, 2009
Messages
12,455
Reaction score
-26
Country
India
Location
India
India, Pakistan were indeed very close to peace deal, says Dr Manmohan Singh

1945180.jpg

At prime minster Dr Manmohan Singh’s farewell press conference, fourth during his 10-year rule, came the first official confirmation that India was about to strike a deal on the issue of Jammu and Kashmir with Pakistan. But the deal went haywire due to President Pervez Musahrraf making way for a different setup in Islamabad. Earlier, such corroborations have only come from Pakistani leaders, more so, its former foreign minister Mehmood Ahmed Kasuri.

In response to a question, Singh said he had tried to improve relations with all neighbours to the best of his ability. “At one time, it appeared that an important breakthrough was in sight. Events in Pakistan, for example, the fact that General Musharraf had to make way for a different setup, I think that led to the process not moving further,” he said.

Singh said he still harbours hope to visit Pakistan before he completes his term in May 2014.
Reminding that he was born in a village which is now part of west Punjab, Singh said that as prime minister he should go to Pakistan if conditions are appropriate to achieve solid results. “I have thought of it many times, but ultimately I felt that circumstances were not appropriate for my visit,” he said.

In fact, the paradigm shift in the engagements with Pakistan had come when prime minister Atal Bihari Vajpayee had travelled to Islamabad in January 2004, opening a widow for an out of box settlement of Kashmir issue. The trajectory of this engagement got a boost, when Manmohan Singh took over and between 2005 and 2007, the peace process peaked, with both sides exchanging non-papers on Kashmir, stipulating their positions, as well as red lines. At the end of foreign secretary-level talks held in New Delhi in January 2006, the then foreign secretary Shyam Saran admitted that both sides discussed Jammu and Kashmir “substantively” almost after half-a-century.

Though the contents of these non-papers are not known, details filtered out count many convergences. While Pakistan had called for joint management and sharing of sovereignty in Jammu and Kashmir, India has used the term cooperative management of resources. “The talks were first derailed after July train bombings in Mumbai and later by the domestic issues in Pakistan,” says a source in the PMO.

It is believed that Pakistan in its non-paper had listed the famed four point solution publicised by Musharraf later. It had offered to abandon its insistence on UN resolutions. These proposals were: Kashmir will have the same borders but people will be allowed to move freely back and forth in the region; the region will have self-governance or autonomy, but not independence; troops will be withdrawn from the region in a staggered manner; and a joint supervision mechanism will be set up, with India, Pakistan and Kashmir represented in the mechanism.

To sum up the Pakistan policy, it meant desisting from demanding any territory for Pakistan; rejecting the communal criteria; and giving up demand of Kashmir secession from India and to encourage Kashmiris separatists to talk to New Delhi. Sources say that it also included a road map to help India stamp out terrorism. In return, in the second leg, India was supposed to move towards resolving outstanding bilateral issues, including Jammu and Kashmir. In the third leg, India offered they would build up “a lasting relationship with Pakistan that involves creation of stakes in each other’s welfare.

India, Pakistan were indeed very close to peace deal, says Dr Manmohan Singh - India - DNA

Back channel talks are on with India: Pakistan
Last Updated: Saturday, January 04, 2014, 14:02


Islamabad: Back channel talks are on with India on Kashmir, Sir Creek and Siachen issues, Pakistan Prime Minister's Advisor on National Security and Foreign Affairs Sartaj Aziz said on Saturday.

However he said that any breakthrough or forward movement on these issues could only be expected after the elections in India.

He said it is Pakistan's "utmost endeavour" to improve relations with India. Though the composite dialogue is facing delay due to the elections in India but certain groups on trade, energy and visa are in negotiations with each other, Aziz told state-run Radio Pakistan.

He said now when India is heading towards elections, peace at the Line of Control and continuation of talks is necessary to avoid any tension in bilateral relations.

When asked about Kashmir issue, Aziz said it is a very important issue and its resolution is imperative for improvement in Pakistan-India relations. "Back channel talks are continuing with India on the issues of Kashmir, Sir Creek and Siachen," Aziz said.

He said several countries have realised the importance of peace between the two countries and "are now evincing interest in Kashmir dispute." To another question? Aziz said Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif had given invitation to his Indian counterpart Manmohan Singh to visit Pakistan.

"Though there is less possibility of his visit but if he wishes to visit Islamabad in the next few weeks we will definitely welcome him," he said.

Pakistan has appointed its former foreign secretary Shehryar Khan as the man responsible for back-channel talks. His Indian counterpart is India's ex-envoy to Pakistan S K Lambah.

Back channel talks are on with India: Pakistan
 
Interesting but the PM or Congress alone couldnt have taken such a decision.
The other parties and the opposition had to be taken into confidence and I dont see BJP allowing any such moves.
And how could India enter into a deal with Musharaff, the man who was responsible for Kargil??
 
Last edited:
"Back channel talks are continuing with India on the issues of Kashmir, Sir Creek and Siachen," Aziz said.

yah sell kashmir congressi AAPtards
 
"Back channel talks are continuing with India on the issues of Kashmir, Sir Creek and Siachen," Aziz said.

yah sell kashmir congressi AAPtards

:lol:

Rajputs are soldiers not kings, it takes lot of effort to establish kingdom. Being called a warrior/soldier/Rajput is easy but to become king or emperor is hard.

There are close to 15 crore rajputs ...... :lol:.

Interesting but the PM or Congress alone couldnt have taken such a decision.
The other parties and the opposition had to be taken into confidence and I dont see BJP allowing any such moves.
And how could India enter a deal with Musharaff, the man who was responsible for Kargil??

It seems major talks will occur after elections.
 
:lol:

Rajputs are soldiers not kings, it takes lot of effort to establish kingdom. Being called a warrior/soldier/Rajput is easy but to become king or emperor is hard.

There are close to 15 crore rajputs ...... :lol:.



It seems major talks will occur after elections.

What was the Rajput thing??:o:
 
:lol:

Rajputs are soldiers not kings, it takes lot of effort to establish kingdom. Being called a warrior/soldier/Rajput is easy but to become king or emperor is hard.

There are close to 15 crore rajputs ...... :lol:.

You know their is separate regiment called Rajputana Rifles and it is their since 1921

and rajputs are the fighters, the modern day pakistan was under our control
 
You know their is separate regiment called Rajputana Rifles and it is their since 1921

and rajputs are the fighters, the modern day pakistan was under our control

I think you are talking about Kushan empire.
 
Rajput is a warrior kshatriya hindu caste and i dont know why these fifth grade pakistani looners use that caste to spoil our name......i feel ashmed

we defeated the muslim invaders

Being called a Rajput is nothing, as there are 15 crore rajputs in India. If one ascends to power as a Rajput then you can be proud.

It is becoming powerful person and the ability to command that makes the difference to an individual, not by lineage or clan. Today's scenario is completely different to that of 400 years ago.
 
Interesting but the PM or Congress alone couldnt have taken such a decision.
The other parties and the opposition had to be taken into confidence and I dont see BJP allowing any such moves.
And how could India enter a deal with Musharaff, the man who was responsible for Kargil??

"Back channel talks are continuing with India on the issues of Kashmir, Sir Creek and Siachen," Aziz said.
yah sell kashmir congressi AAPtards

You chaps do realize that it is the demand of current Realpolitik that both our countries come to an understanding and fast. Even if we discount the election hype and brownie points gathering by the Congress and the AAP , what makes you so certain that the BJP did not carry out similar back channel diplomacy even at the height of the Kargil war.

This is 2014. Politics and foreign relations these days are far removed from the days of Stalin, Roosevelt and Khrushchev. Everybody speaks with everyone at all times. We as civilians know about it when they choose to tell us.

cheers
 
Last edited:
Rajput is a warrior kshatriya hindu caste and i dont know why these fifth grade pakistani looners use that caste to spoil our name......i feel ashmed


The first native to win a VC was a muslim Rajput from Jhelum,Pakistan... :lol:



we defeated the muslim invaders

Yeah Akbar comes to mind.. :azn:

You know their is separate regiment called Rajputana Rifles and it is their since 1921

and rajputs are the fighters, the modern day pakistan was under our control

:rofl: :rofl:
 
Being called a Rajput is nothing, as there are 15 crore rajputs in India. If one ascends to power as a Rajput then you can be proud.

It is becoming powerful person and the ability to command that makes the difference to an individual, not by lineage or clan. Today's scenario is completely different to that of 400 years ago.

if we rajputs didn't stop islamic invaders in battle of rajasthan you might have been praying in a masjid right now ;)


The first native to win a VC was a muslim Rajput from Jhelum,Pakistan... :lol:

Yeah Akbar comes to mind.. :azn:
:rofl: :rofl:

tell your wannabe rajputs to stop using our castes ...muslim rajputs were traitors
 
Back
Top Bottom