What's new

India must step in : Chairman of the Kuwait Centre for Strategic Studies.

Mech

BANNED
Joined
Mar 26, 2011
Messages
3,161
Reaction score
-5
Country
India
Location
Slovenia
India needs to step in
By Sami Al Faraj

3501731280_sami-al-faraj.gif


The Arab Spring so far has hit countries with medium to low Indian population. The only exception was Bahrain, a member of the Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC), where the protests have been brought under control. Some GCC states like Saudi Arabia, the UAE and Oman have prevented the Arab Spring from being successful in their territory, but there are signs that the GCC states are moving towards a critical phase. Their fate will be determined by the sectarian issue, external influence and domestic political repression.

Five years ago, the world did not know much about Shia-Sunni conflict in West Asia. Today, sectarian conflict is among the key factors troubling the GCC states. At stake for India in the GCC states are nearly two-thirds of its total energy imports and four million expatriates, who contribute approximately $35 billion to the Indian economy annually, in foreign remittances. According to estimates, India's oil import from the GCC states is expected to increase to 91.6 per cent by 2020. Given India's close economic and civilisational ties, New Delhi has to consider stepping in to manage the pressure of national political reform and international rivalry in the Gulf region. India being the largest democracy not just in Asia but in the entire world, the Arabs have a lot to learn from it.

To begin with, India can share its rich democratic heritage with the Arabs. Indian democracy has not been hindered by poverty or other disabling factors. Resilience of Indian democracy is of great interest to the Arab society. The Arab Spring has resulted from the search for dignity, which democracy alone can guarantee.

Owing to the absence of democracy, only those organisations with traditional underground networks like the Islamic Brotherhood have survived in the Arab world. The Brotherhood now has the entire political arena to itself, as other players had never prepared for this day. Given the chance to dominate the polity, the Brotherhood will most likely not change its orthodox ways. They have already started enforcing their key principles, like insistence on using the veil. But Salafist extremism is just one dimension of the problem. The other one is Iranian intervention in the region.

Turkey, the key regional power, has been mediating in the tense exchange between the Iranians and the Arabs. But Turkey is not able to handle Iran effectively. Despite Iranian provocation, people in eastern Saudi Arabia have behaved responsibly because they know that they are sitting on the largest reserve of crude oil in the world. In Kuwait, we found out a secret Iranian cell, which had plans to sabotage two oil producing centres. We have given Iranians the evidence.

India can convince Iran to step back from brinkmanship. It has engaged Iran very well and we want to utilise this channel for an Iran-GCC dialogue. India has created a dialogue mechanism with Iran over Afghanistan, where all difficult issues are discussed. We are requesting India to use that platform to take up the issue of Arab-Iran relations. India must understand that, as the great power closest to GCC, it is within its rights to intervene in the Iranian nuclear stand-off, for the sake of non-nuclear Arab states. Iranian intransigence is forcing countries like Saudi Arabia to go nuclear. We must stop this chain of nuclearisation.

India's silence is pushing the GCC states into the hands of the Chinese and if India stays uninvolved, then one day you will see the Chinese shadow in the Gulf as well.

SOURCE :http://week.manoramaonline.com/cgi-bin/MMOnline.dll/portal/ep/theWeekContent.do?tabId=13&contentId=10651417&programId=10350717&categoryId=-169181&BV_ID=@@@
 
.
Mr. Faraj is certainly very persuasive but that's just about it. India does not exercise ( nor does it wish to ) "control" or "rein in" Iran. Iran is a valued partner of India with whom we share many interests. India can however, provide her expertise in establishing a democratic set-up and associated values in the arab states. A stable Middle-east is well within Indian interests. But i doubt whether my country will be willing to act as a mediator.
 
.
I know the reason India stays away from these issues is because there are too many complications among gulf countries...we can not manage to interfere without hurting some of our friends in this region...
 
.
I know the reason India stays away from these issues is because there are too many complications among gulf countries...we can not manage to interfere without hurting some of our friends in this region...
We need to act smart to use the enemies like using Iran and Israel with out hurting our relations . Indeed we are now spoiling the relations with both the countries and at the same time we cant let China to become more friendly with Gulf and Iran . It would be a great damage to us and our oil benefits .
 
.
We need to act smart to use the enemies like using Iran and Israel with out hurting our relations . Indeed we are now spoiling the relations with both the countries .

Maybe its just best we remain neutral...like we always have. We have business interests in the region....no need to get more personal than that...wouldn't you agree? There is just no way to "intervene" without making a mess of it all.
 
.
India's stand on Iran is clear - Since Iran has signed NPT (unlike India and Pak), it must not build a weapon. It is well within its rights to pursue civilian nuclear energy.

Where we disagree with US is how to go about it? US wants to probably bomb Iran or may be put sanctions on the central bank of Iran. Now, given our long standing relation with Iran we're not in favor of it getting bombed and about the latter, it creates difficulties for India to pay its oil bills.

This is why India doesn't want to get into a spot where it has to chose Iran or the US. Now, having said that - India has made it clear that it'll abide by any UNSC resolution on Iran (including but not limited to sanctions).

India must be diplomatically active to help all these states steer through this controversial topic since we've excellent relations with all the players, viz., US, Israel, Iran, Arab states.
 
.
Interesting article. I'd say the author raises some very accurate points. India has been able to manage a feat very few other countries have achieved, enhance Indo-Arab and Indo-Israeli ties simultaneously without with relationship having a major detriment to the other. As such due to New Delhi's notorious "soft power" (in no small part due to the significant number of Indian migrants in the region) it wields ever greater influence in the region, coupled with India's strict democratic code this could be a great time for India to play a mentoring role and with India's clout growing year on year the process could only be helped.

However, of course, there are many other factors India would have to deal with. The first, and perhaps the most challenging to overcome, is that the current regimes are unlikely to be willing to step away and hand over power to the people without significant political or military pressure and as we have seen are likely to staunchly defend their power with disastrous outcomes for many. Secondly their needs to be significant and overwhelming, organic public support for Indian involvement AND regime change without both India could seriously get her fingers burnt. Thirdly nation-building is a notoriously difficult and treacherous task, one which any nation would find challenging, it could be incredibly hard for India to go about doing this on her own. There is no doubt India has the capabilities (both militarily and financial) to do this but it would be more than likely India would ask for international assistance, not to mention many foreign organisations/nations are going to want "a piece of the action". Fourthly ,and again One of the biggest hurdles, there would need to be significant political will and unity shown by the Indian political class for such moves to be taken in a cohesive manner, instead you would get a shoddy, hasty, disjointed mess. Of course outside parties (most notably the US) would need to be considered amd consoulted as these parties are going to have their own interests which may not always align with India's.
 
.
Maybe its just best we remain neutral...like we always have. We have business interests in the region....no need to get more personal than that...wouldn't you agree? There is just no way to "intervene" without making a mess of it all.
There are three ways of being neutral
1.Intervening and Being good with both
2.Intervening and Hurting relations with both
3.Remain purely non aligned when business and economy comes in to play next comes the military although the exception can be seen US-China relationship where the political factor also plays an important role .
Currently we are some what following the 2nd point . Like irking israel on palasthine,iran on oil,China on US,US on some thing....
And Israel is an important partner militarily and Iran and Arab countries economically . We need every one at the same timewe should be selfish about us else its we who will be ****** .
 
. .
India's isolationist stand on everything is beginning to bother me a bit now .

Would you rather have the 'Death to America' chants become 'Death to America and India'? Considering how many of our brethren are settled in the Middle East? And at the same time should we compromise our relationship with Israel who helps us with quite a chunk of our defense needs, and potentially agricultural tech needs?

Other countries may not like our friendly stance towards themselves and at the same time towards their 'sworn' enemies, but that's how it is, and if they don't like it they can always lodge a complaint through the usual diplomatic channels.
 
.
India certainly needs to take some part in the events - we cant just sit by an do nothing. What to do is the question - The answer (to me at least ) is simple - do whats in the best interest of the indians living in the middle east - and believe it or not the indians are very happy with the current regimes in the middle east and most certainly DO NOT want a regime change as most of the opposition do not want expats in their country - So how do we get to keep the current regimes in power while also advocating democracy to the arab population - One way to do this would be to ask the arab govts to give more and more indians citizenship and at the same time ask them to give the citizens voting powers and give the parliament more power - the Indians being a huge part of the population will swing the votes in favor of the monarchies - thus making the indians over there happy as well as the current regimes - But this method will come with its own set of difficulties as when the indians get arab citizenships - they are no longer Indian - a way around that would be dual citizenship - of course other problems might also arise but nothing we cant manage
 
.
india would be wise not to step in, however a big elephant like india is expected to take sides sooner or later,this is i feel a major challenge for india, but the more india deftly avoids doing so the the more respect and admiration i have for their forward thinking.
 
.
india would be wise not to step in, however a big elephant like india is expected to take sides sooner or later,this is i feel a major challenge for india, but the more india deftly avoids doing so the the more respect and admiration i have for their forward thinking.
our move depends on which side Pakistan takes .
 
.
India's isolationist stand on everything is beginning to bother me a bit now .

Do you think we would have come this far as an independent entity if we hadn't taken the isolationist approach ? India, at the moment..is no one's proxy. No country ever became a world power by serving someone else's interests.
 
.
our move depends on which side Pakistan takes .

Not true at all. Pakistan is an independent entity free to pursue their own goals. However, India will intervene when it conflicts with our interests.
 
.
Back
Top Bottom