What's new

India, Japan, US plan naval exercises in tightening of ties in Indian Ocean

Ryuzaki

SENIOR MEMBER
Joined
Feb 1, 2015
Messages
3,158
Reaction score
-12
Country
India
Location
Netherlands
NEW DELHI: Japan is set to take part in joint naval exercises with India and the United States in the Indian Ocean in October, military and diplomatic sources said, a drill that so riled China eight years ago that Delhi has not since hosted such a multilateral wargame.

The Indian Ocean has emerged as a new arena of competition between China making inroads and India trying to recover its position as the dominant maritime power in the region.

New Delhi's decision to expand the "Malabar" exercises that it conducts with the United States each year to include Japan suggests a tightening of military relations between three major maritime powers in Asia, analysts said.

Military officials from India, the US and Japan are meeting at a US navy base in Yokosuka, near Tokyo, on Wednesday and Thursday to plan the exercises, a navy and a diplomatic source in New Delhi said.

A Japanese government official in Tokyo confirmed the meeting and said representatives from the three navies were discussing Tokyo's participation in the wargames. He declined to be identified.

The officials will decide the type of warships and planes the navies will deploy for the exercises in the Bay of Bengal in the northeastern Indian Ocean, said one of the sources familiar with the initial planning.

"They are discussing platforms, logistics and interoperability between the three naval forces," said the source. India and the United States have fielded aircraft carriers and nuclear submarines in previous bilateral exercises.

An Indian defence ministry official declined any comment on Malabar 2015, saying announcements will only be made closer to the event. A spokesman for Japan's Maritime Self Defense Force said no decision had yet been taken on Japan's participation.


CLOSER TIES

Jeff Smith, a South Asia specialist at the American Foreign Policy Council, said Japan was keen to take part in the exercises this year at a time when it is expanding the role of its military against a more assertive China.

Prime Minister Narendra Modi's inclusion of Japan after some hesitation was part of a trending pattern of forging close ties with the US and its allies.

"I'd view aircraft carrier participation in this year's drill as yet another signal from the Modi government that it was shedding the (previous) government's anxiety about a more overt balancing posture toward China and a more robust strategic embrace of the U.S. and Japan," Smith said.

India last hosted a multilateral exercise in 2007 when it invited Japan, Australia and Singapore to join its drills with the US navy in the Bay of Bengal, prompting disquiet in Beijing where some saw it as a US-inspired security grouping in the making along the lines of NATO in Europe.

At the time, Beijing activated diplomatic channels seeking an explanation from the participating nations, said Gurpreet Khurana, Indian navy captain and executive director of the government-funded Maritime Foundation of India.

The exercises held in the Indian Ocean were scaled back in the following years, with India participating in three-way events only when it was away from its shores, such as last year's drills off Japan's Nagasaki coast.

AN OCEAN OF RIVALRY

But China's expanding naval footprint in the Indian Ocean including submarines docking in Sri Lanka, just off the toe of India last year, and again in Karachi in May, has prompted Modi's administration to accelerate naval modernisation as well as shore up ties with maritime nations.

"Modi's Delhi is no longer willing to give Beijing a veto over its defence partnerships," said C. Raja Mohan, a top Indian foreign policy expert who has just published a book: "Modi's World: Expanding India's Sphere of Influence."

Just as China had overridden India's concerns about arch-enemy Pakistan and was building ports and roads under a $46 billion economic corridor, New Delhi was free to pursue closer security cooperation with the West and its partners, Mohan said.

The Indian Ocean has become the new global centre of trade and energy flows, accounting for half the world's container traffic and 70 percent of its petroleum shipments.

More than three quarters of China's oil transits through the Indian Ocean and its choke points such as the Malacca Straits, prompting its search for friendly ports and islands to secure the shipping lanes backed by an expanding Chinese navy, Chinese commentators say.

"India alone cannot assure the security of the Indian Ocean, even if it regards (it) as its backyard and wishes no one to compete with it there," wrote Zhou Bo, an honorary fellow at the Beijing-based Academy of Military Science in the China Daily.

"If the Pacific Ocean is big enough to accommodate China and the US, so is the Indian Ocean to accommodate India and China."

Read more at:
India, Japan, US plan naval exercises in tightening of ties in Indian Ocean - The Economic Times
 
. .
Since india is in this club Iran should join the club.
 
. . . . . .
LOL IRGC exercising with the 'Great Satan'.

Ideologies change, ideologies flex and have shown to accommodate the requirements of the times. The former Soviet Union, once established in the firmament of Soviet communism, even adopted changes through Glasnost, and now Russia is a capitalist, participatory representative state.

China, once a strictly marxist state established in the Maoist theory that once had aversion to western capitalism and even participatory democracy, has transformed itself after the 1978 Open Door Policy Initiative endorsed by the late Deng Xiaoping. China, today, is the 2nd largest economy in the world and the very reason for China's ability to do this has been its embrace of capitalism thanks in part to the Deng Xiaoping Open Door Policy of 1978 and invitation of foreign direct investments from Japan, the United States, Europe.

The lessons of both China and Russia teaches us that ideologies, truly, are not permanent, rather, they are influential in the societal demands of the specific times. Political ideologies are, like organic entities, adaptable and may have to evolve to suit the changes in the national polity in order for the ruling power to stay at the national helm. The lessons of China's CPC , and Russia is proof of this very praxis. Adapt -- Evolve and survive. Do not adapt, do not evolve and you will perish.


Regards,
@Nihonjin1051
 
.
Don't worry, I believe our Australian friends will join next time. :)

Australians with all due respect to them have been tamed by Chinese Govt. Of-course to them it might seem logical as they are quite dependent on Chinese trade and don't have the necessary wherewithal to go toe to toe with China - very few countries do.
 
.
Singapore and Japan must join this exercise every time
 
.
Singapore and Japan must join this exercise every time

Of-course more the merrier!!

I believe down the line Malabar would become an important tool for signalling purposes.

US, Japan and India would likely be permanent fixtures and depending on the geo-political circumstances other nations will drop in or out.
 
.
Ideologies change, ideologies flex and have shown to accommodate the requirements of the times. The former Soviet Union, once established in the firmament of Soviet communism, even adopted changes through Glasnost, and now Russia is a capitalist, participatory representative state.

China, once a strictly marxist state established in the Maoist theory that once had aversion to western capitalism and even participatory democracy, has transformed itself after the 1978 Open Door Policy Initiative endorsed by the late Deng Xiaoping. China, today, is the 2nd largest economy in the world and the very reason for China's ability to do this has been its embrace of capitalism thanks in part to the Deng Xiaoping Open Door Policy of 1978 and invitation of foreign direct investments from Japan, the United States, Europe.

The lessons of both China and Russia teaches us that ideologies, truly, are not permanent, rather, they are influential in the societal demands of the specific times. Political ideologies are, like organic entities, adaptable and may have to evolve to suit the changes in the national polity in order for the ruling power to stay at the national helm. The lessons of China's CPC , and Russia is proof of this very praxis. Adapt -- Evolve and survive. Do not adapt, do not evolve and you will perish.


Regards,
@Nihonjin1051
The problem for changing this ideology is that you would need to change the people behind it i.e the Mullahs and Ayatollahs which means either :suicide2: or :sniper: or :guns: and then the people would have to accept of such change. You can ask the Iranian members on this very board what they want.
 
.
Of-course more the merrier!!

I believe down the line Malabar would become an important tool for signalling purposes.

US, Japan and India would likely be permanent fixtures and depending on the geo-political circumstances other nations will drop in or out.


What is clear --- is that Japan and India are two pillars of stability and strength in the two great oceans; Pacific and Indian. Long may our naval traditions and naval institutions forge strength, unity, interoperability and firmly affixed in stability of our region, of Asia and the world.
 
. .

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom