What's new

India is just starting the long voyage to naval-power status

shree835

BANNED
Joined
Jun 26, 2010
Messages
3,005
Reaction score
-19
Country
India
Location
India
This month India joined the elite club of nations that have demonstrated the capability to design and build their own aircraft carriers

INS Vikrant, as the ship is called, was launched with great fanfare on August 12 by the nation’s defence minister, as a sign of India’s coming of age as a naval power.

Three days earlier the government had announced that the reactor in INS Arihant, the first Indian-built nuclear-powered submarine, had gone critical.

But the nautical celebrations came to an abrupt end on August 14, when INS Sindhurakshak, one of the 10 Kilo-class boats that form the backbone of India’s ageing conventional submarine force, sank, after explosions at the naval dockyard in Mumbai, killing 18 crewmen.

Together these developments underscored the giant strides that India has made, but also the challenges that remain, as the country strives to emerge as a naval power.

Under development for the past eight years, Vikrant is expected to begin sea trials next year. The carrier will not only help India defend its coasts but will also allow the projection of power much further off its shores, something naval planners have long desired.

Meanwhile Prime Minister Manmohan Singh called the activation of the reactor aboard Arihant a “giant stride in … our indigenous technological capabilities”.

This project, conducted over more than a decade of highly secret work, will complete India’s nuclear “triad” along with existing delivery systems using missiles and aircraft. And the submarine’s ballistic missiles will give India a second-strike capability.

India is pursuing naval expansion with an eye on China, and Arihant and Vikrant notwithstanding, the country has nautical miles to go before it can catch up with its powerful neighbour, which has made significant advances in the waters surrounding India.

The aircraft carrier launch is critical for the Indian Navy, which is anxious to maintain its presence in the shipping lanes of the Indian Ocean and Arabian Sea, especially in light of China’s big naval build-up. Last year China commissioned its first aircraft carrier, Liaoning, a refurbished vessel purchased from Ukraine in 1998. China is also working on is own indigenous carrier.

India remains heavily dependent on imports to meet its defence requirements, so its recent successes are particularly important. But for all the euphoria, it will be five years until the Vikrant is finally commissioned. And Arihant has yet to have its sea trials.

The two announcements do show that the Indian Navy wants to be a serious blue-water force and is working hard to achieve that goal. Indian naval planners have long argued that if it is to maintain continuous operational readiness in the Indian Ocean, protect sea lanes in the Gulf and monitor Chinese activities in the Bay of Bengal, it needs at least three carriers and five nuclear subs. With the carrier Admiral Gorshkov on track to be delivered by Russia this year, and a second Indian-built carrier, INS Vishal, in the wings, India could have three operating carriers by 2019.

On the other hand, the Sindhurakshak disaster is a reminder of enduring safety and reliability problems. The Indian Navy has a poor accident record, with several mishaps in recent years.

Sindhurakshak had been reintroduced to service only this April, after a refit in Russia. The Navy has ordered a review after initial investigations suggested that arms on board the sub may have played a role in its sinking. The accident was a reminder that while India’s surface-fleet expansion has been progressing well, the submarine fleet is ageing, and replacement boats are not on track.

Despite the success of Vikrant and Arihant, defence production has been marred by serious technical and organisational problems, leading to significant delays. Much like India’s other two services, the navy has found it difficult to translate its conceptual commitment to self-reliance and domestic production into actionable policy. The result has been continued reliance on external sources for much of the needed modernisation. Yet India’s reliance on its navy to project power will increase as naval build-ups continue in the Indo-Pacific.

Apart from China, other powers are also developing their naval might. Japan’s commissioning of a third helicopter carrier, the Izumo, has raised hackles in Beijing, which has referred to it as an “aircraft carrier in disguise”.

Also, India’s naval engagement with east- and south-east-Asian states is integral to its two-decades-old “Look East” policy. Countries ranging from the Philippines, Thailand and Indonesia to Vietnam and Myanmar have been pushing India to assume a higher profile. India is training sailors from Myanmar and at least four “offshore patrol vehicles” for that country are under construction in Indian shipyards.

The navy has also been supplying spares to Hanoi for its Russian-origin ships and missile boats, and has extended a $100- million (Dh367mn) credit line to Vietnam for the purchase of patrol boats. The Indian defense minister, AK Antony, was in Australia, Thailand and Singapore recently forging closer naval ties, even as New Delhi’s naval relationships with major western powers and the Gulf states are blossoming.

The Indian Navy will remain an indispensable tool for furthering national foreign policy. But as resources dry up with the decline in economic growth, naval planners will have to think more carefully about what comes next if India wants to emerge as a serious naval power.

http://www.thenational.ae/thenationalconversation/comment/india-is-just-starting-the-long-voyage-to-naval-power-status
 
.
Indian navy might will be a constant threat to China. China need to be careful & prudent to tackle the situation. They must have a better look at the Indian sea, rather than Okinawa & the Philippines. China can use Myanmar or Bangladesh ports as an alliance symbol.
 
.
Indian navy might will be a constant threat to China. China need to be careful & prudent to tackle the situation. They must have a better look at the Indian sea, rather than Okinawa & the Philippines. China can use Myanmar or Bangladesh ports as an alliance symbol.

india's threat to us is at the Malacca Strait and the oil route
at the moment as long as they are running by the indian navy they are not much a threat yet to us than to its other neighbours
 
.
India is not a threat to China...

I think Humanity needs to look beyond their narrow differences..

there are enemies of Humanity far greater then we can fathom in the darkness beyond the earth...
 
.
Indian navy might will be a constant threat to China. China need to be careful & prudent to tackle the situation. They must have a better look at the Indian sea, rather than Okinawa & the Philippines. China can use Myanmar or Bangladesh ports as an alliance symbol.

Why would it be a threat? We got no claims in the indian ocean, yet....

Also america is strong not because of its carriers, it has the other vessels to back it up. India at current doesn't. Seeing as how indian carrier will need so much longer to finish, at present, from what i can see, it's just a shell, we may still finish one before it, or at least around the same time.

Navy btw is the only "threat" if you must the other branches are pretty medieval.
 
.
Why would it be a threat? We got no claims in the indian ocean, yet....

Also america is strong not because of its carriers, it has the other vessels to back it up. India at current doesn't. Seeing as how indian carrier will need so much longer to finish, at present, from what i can see, it's just a shell, we may still finish one before it, or at least around the same time.

Navy btw is the only "threat" if you must the other branches are pretty medieval.

India is not a threat to China as India has no such intention.

Do not forget India would be getting Vikramaditya soon with Mig-29s.

Also beyond your shores without the PLAAF, the PLAN would be a sitting duck for IN and IAF. (In case of hostilities). Please be real. PLAN badly needs A/C if it wants to project power in Indian Ocean.

But let me reassure you India does not intend to threaten China. War with China is equally devastating for India. I believe cooperation and protection of Indian Ocean (from West) is more important for India and China.

If India and China fight in Indian Ocean, then neither will get anything and others would keep Indian Ocean in control.
 
.
chinese can just show their power to smaller countries in their nearest south china sea and that is it..come far away to Indian ocean and show your strength and they we will see who has guts...
 
.
Certainly is a long voyage, started 5,000 years ago :coffee:
 
.
India is not a threat to China as India has no such intention.

Do not forget India would be getting Vikramaditya soon with Mig-29s.

Also beyond your shores without the PLAAF, the PLAN would be a sitting duck for IN and IAF.

True, i don't think a big naval engagement is on the cards within about two decades, depending on situation then it may be for another few decades after that.

Recieving your carrier will be good, but the fact of the matter is this, if we are to look at past carrier battles, japan vs america, the fleets usually don't meet each other. It's a battle of planes. While we can quickly replace our fleet of j-15s can india just as easily replace its migs?

You must make your own planes if you are to fight a war over the skies. Otherwise your forces will be depeleted way too fast.

Beyond our shores, the current battle ships still have anti air, and by the time we do engage, though i don't think it will happen based on current situation, we will have enough bases to have a sufficent force to engage on the seas.
 
.
China alone cannot save Asian Resources from USA and NATO. It needs cooperation from equally strong countries like India.

Fighting with India means, China would not only weeken itself but would also loose a strong ally. Then US and NATO can do as they please with China.

What do Chinese think. Can China can keep USA and NATO away from Asia once China is weakened after a war with India?
 
.
True, i don't think a big naval engagement is on the cards within about two decades, depending on situation then it may be for another few decades after that.

Recieving your carrier will be good, but the fact of the matter is this, if we are to look at past carrier battles, japan vs america, the fleets usually don't meet each other. It's a battle of planes. While we can quickly replace our fleet of j-15s can india just as easily replace its migs?

You must make your own planes if you are to fight a war over the skies. Otherwise your forces will be depeleted way too fast.

Beyond our shores, the current battle ships still have anti air, and by the time we do engage, though i don't think it will happen based on current situation, we will have enough bases to have a sufficent force to engage on the seas.

Enough bases ???
 
.
So the d1ck measuring begins. At the moment the Chinese have technological superiority at sea while Indians have the strategic upper hand..
 
.
China alone cannot save Asian Resources from USA and NATO. It needs cooperation from equally strong countries like India.

Fighting with India means, China would not only weeken itself but would also loose a strong ally. Then US and NATO can do as they please with China.

What do Chinese think. Can China can keep USA and NATO away from Asia once China is weakened after a war with India?

strong ally?? India ..India is neither an ally nor an enemy to china..but china is making sure india becomes its enemy with its foolish mis adventures and tricks for upper hand in negotiations..
 
.
True, i don't think a big naval engagement is on the cards within about two decades, depending on situation then it may be for another few decades after that.

Recieving your carrier will be good, but the fact of the matter is this, if we are to look at past carrier battles, japan vs america, the fleets usually don't meet each other. It's a battle of planes. While we can quickly replace our fleet of j-15s can india just as easily replace its migs?

You must make your own planes if you are to fight a war over the skies. Otherwise your forces will be depeleted way too fast.

Beyond our shores, the current battle ships still have anti air, and by the time we do engage, though i don't think it will happen based on current situation, we will have enough bases to have a sufficent force to engage on the seas.

So true the Air Force has a big role to play.

Right now PLAN prospects are not good, as India can bring in IAF but PLAAF cannot come in Indian Ocean. But it is no cause of concern as India would never gain anything by causing harm to China in Indian Ocean.

After 2 decades I am sure China would be strong enough with a few A/C and maybe bases to carry the fight in Indian Ocean.

But I feel cooperation b/w China and India is key to protect Indian Ocean from outside people. So if India and China want they can easily cooperate for the next 80-90 years and ensure that India Ocean is never occupied or dominated by outside forces. The stronger China in future along with a stronger India should use their forces together to protect their common interests and share/protect their vast resources.

The stronger China should lead to a stronger India and vice versa.
 
. .

Latest posts

Pakistan Defence Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom