What's new

India goes nuts ‘competing’ with China

idune

ELITE MEMBER
Joined
Dec 14, 2008
Messages
13,663
Reaction score
-40
Country
Bangladesh
Location
United States
India goes nuts ‘competing’ with China
M.K. Bhadrakumar

Hopefully, the first-ever visit by Bangladesh Prime Minister Sheikh Hasina to India during the tenure of the present government will not get deferred for the third time. Foreign Secretary met Hasina in Dhaka and choreographed an April visit. But the water-sharing agreement remains elusive. It is difficult to see how or why Mamata Bannerjee would oblige PM Narendra Modi.

Meanwhile, there are other sticking points too. According to reports, Dhaka is reluctant to sign a defence agreement and prefers a non-committal Memorandum of Understanding that would be symbolic and provide the photo-op, but won’t assume obligations. The proposed agreement was a key talking point for Defence Minister Manohar Parrikar when he visited Dhaka in December. Delhi held out a seductive $500 million credit line attached to the agreement. But Bangladesh army is reasoning that when India prefers high-quality stuff from Russian or western vendors, why should Bangladesh settle for the ‘Make in India’ stuff?
Bangladesh probably wants to cherry pick. Bangladesh is not Nepal or Myanmar. It is an ambitious country and will look for advantages. The Chinese equipment is cheap and easy to use and comes with no strings attached. The real issue could be that Bangladesh army is reluctant to become dependent on India.

Equally, Reuters has reported that China’s state-run Zenhua Oil recently signed a preliminary deal worth $2 billion with Chevron to buy natural gas fields in Bangladesh. These are the Jalalabad, Bibiyana and Moulavi Bazar gas fields, located in the north-eastern regions bordering Meghalaya and Assam.

Zenhua happens to be a unit of China’s defence industry conglomerate Norinco and has the backing of the state-backed investment vehicle China Reforms Holding Corp. Of course, Bangladesh holds the right of first refusal on assets and could block the Zenhua-Chevron deal. But will it? The timeline is June. Meanwhile, in May Hasina is planning to attend the One Belt One Road (OBOR) summit that China is hosting. Bangladesh has already announced its interest in formally joining the OBOR initiative.

India is countering by firing all eight cylinders. The High Commissioner in Dhaka was quoted by local press as saying that “around $11 billion of investments from India in the power, LNG and port sectors in Bangladesh are in the pipeline… India now allows duty-free benefits to all Bangladeshi goods, except for cigarette and alcohol items…There is no limit to what you can get from India because we have a lot of surplus energy. We can sell you electricity any time… you can take 1,000 megawatt, 2,000 megawatt and even 10,000 megawatt…”


Things don’t add up. $11 billion? That’s approximately Rs. 71,500 crores. Isn’t it incredible that the budget allocated for the Navodaya Vidyalaya Samiti in 2015-16 to run 589 schools with over 2 lakh students was a mere Rs. 1905 crores? Or that the Kendriya Vidyalaya Sanghatan, which runs 1,099 schools with over 11.7 lakh children, got a budget allocation of Rs. 3190 crore? That is, a mere 7 percent of the investments India is planning to make in Bangladesh!

To be sure, China is driving our government nuts. The paranoia over “competition” with China (and Pakistan) has so far prompted Modi government to offer $1 billion to Mongolia, $2 billion to Afghanistan, $1 billion to Nepal, $2 billion to Bangladesh and so on. It makes no sense that Reliance Power and Adani Group cannot be persuaded to work in India’s power sector instead of the GOI providing finance to the tune of $5 billion at highly concessional terms to “incentivise” them to undertake projects in Bangladesh.

Bangladesh will never become a Chinese colony. Our paranoia is not only unwarranted, it is downright stupid. New thinking is needed. The accent should be on regional stability instead of chasing “influence”. At any rate, look at the level of our “influence” on Sri Lanka today. The Delhi elites hark back to Buddhism to establish affinities with Colombo, while Sri Lankan Tamils abandoned by India resort to satyagraha to get justice.

“Influence” comes with respect — and respect cannot be bought off the shelf. China earned respect when its phenomenal rise drew world attention. If India too can grow at double digits for a decade or two, it will become a role model and it will earn respect. Conversely, a country with 500 million people living under the poverty line doesn’t instill admiration or command respect. The current priorities of foreign policy are quite clear — facilitate a favourable external environment in which the development agenda can be advanced. Without doubt, India is a beneficiary of peace and stability in the region.

China and Bangladesh signed loan agreements worth $20 billion, and trade and investment deals worth $13.6 billion, on the sidelines of President Xi Jinping’s visit to Dhaka last October. Why should India try to match it? China apparently has enormous surplus capital to invest abroad. We don’t have such capacity. Period. On the other hand, our priority should be to attract Chinese investments to India. Yet, all of Chinese investments in India for the entire 2016 worked out to just over $1 billion only.

About author: MK Bhadrakumar served as a career diplomat in the Indian Foreign Service for over 29 years, with postings including India’s ambassador to Uzbekistan (1995-1998) and to Turkey (1998-2001). He writes the “Indian Punchline” blog and has written regularly for the Asia Times since 2001.

http://blogs.rediff.com/mkbhadrakumar/2017/03/02/india-goes-nuts-competing-with-china/
 
.
Delhi held out a seductive $500 million credit line attached to the agreement. But Bangladesh army is reasoning that when India prefers high-quality stuff from Russian or western vendors, why should Bangladesh settle for the ‘Make in India’ stuff?
Bangladesh probably wants to cherry pick. Bangladesh is not Nepal or Myanmar. It is an ambitious country and will look for advantages.
@Aung Zaya @Nilgiri

:disagree:
 
.
China apparently has enormous surplus capital to invest abroad. We don’t have such capacity. Period.

The reason China has such enormous surplus capital to invest abroad, is because we have had massive current account and trade surpluses over the past few decades.

India on the other hand has equally large trade deficits, the majority of which is ironically owed to China every year. And it has been increasing every single year.
 
Last edited:
.
I mostly agree with what is written in the article. Any desire to compete with China in the geo-strategic sphere should have clear and tangible goals. The Indian government is not in a position to squander money on illusory notions of prestige.

Of course, companies are free to make investment decisions as they please, and there is no harm in the government lobbying on their behalf but it should not involve financial incentives unless it makes commercial and financial sense.

If we can maintain a solid economic trajectory, strategic imbalances will be rectified in the medium term in any case. We would therefore be better served focusing on our own economy and how to get out of this era of jobless growth.
 
. . .
India goes nuts ‘competing’ with China
M.K. Bhadrakumar

Hopefully, the first-ever visit by Bangladesh Prime Minister Sheikh Hasina to India during the tenure of the present government will not get deferred for the third time. Foreign Secretary met Hasina in Dhaka and choreographed an April visit. But the water-sharing agreement remains elusive. It is difficult to see how or why Mamata Bannerjee would oblige PM Narendra Modi

Sir @idune, thank you for opening such a knowledgeable thread. You see, BD is not going to sign any Defence Treaty with its big neighbor, India. So, keep your sword inside the scabbard for the time being. I believe, BD is demanding a Teesta water sharing treaty with India. If India signs such a treaty, only then BD may sign a MoU on defense related matters, but certainly not a Defense Pact.
 
.
Very pragmatic comments there from the author...

I really fail to understand India's approach of competing against China when you could have a reliable partner in them... China is even willing to invest billions of dollars in India which could trigger the latter's economic growth...

As far as I understand, China's threat perception is mainly centered around the US; they want a bipolar (or multipolar) world order where China is one of the core countries (the Middle Kingdom)... That 'String of Pearls' theory is a piece of shit...

China's support to Pakistan is mainly because of the latter's strategic location. A friendly Pakistan wouldn't only be beneficial to curb the Xinjiang insurgency but will also help China to grow influence in the resourceful Central Asia by providing a direct access to the sea...

India should really come out of its outdated foreign policy and pursue a pragmatic approach that is compatible with the emerging situations...
 
. .
The reason China has such enormous surplus capital to invest abroad, is because we have had massive current account and trade surpluses over the past few decades.

India on the other hand has equally large trade deficits, the majority of which is ironically owed to China every year. And it has been increasing every single year.
Things aren't that rosy in China. The surplus capital in China is also caused by deteriorating investment environment. Capital that cannot find opportunities in China is the one that becomes "surplus". What China should be doing is to reduce the investment obstacles, particularly governmental restrictions and interference, so that little capital becomes "surplus".
 
.
India is the 6th largest economy , billions are spare change if it gets results , that said India should focus on bilateral infrastructure projects rather than shelling money just because china does it.
 
. . .
India on the other hand has equally large trade deficits, the majority of which is ironically owed to China every year. And it has been increasing every single year.
Not exactly, India's exports have picked up again after a fall of 7 months. Along with 2 years high manufacturing growth, India's exports to China soared 42% in January.
http://www.globaltimes.cn/content/1035781.shtml

In fact, India used to score surplus, in mid of last decade, then, it came down.

India's trade deficit had actually depleted last fiscal. If it keeps getting depleted at pace it's doing now, India can again score a surplus in 9 years.

But I think I must refrain from commenting on exports. They depend on more factors than county's own economic & manufacturing performance, that is demand in foreign markets which was reason behind fall of our exports last time.
 
. .
Back
Top Bottom