What's new

INDIA COOPERATED WITH SANCTIONS ON IRAN: REPORT

INDIAPOSITIVE

ELITE MEMBER
Joined
Sep 20, 2014
Messages
9,318
Reaction score
-28
Country
India
Location
India
India generally cooperated with sanctions on Iran: Report
By PTI | Updated: Feb 07, 2017, 02.29 PM IST
Post a Comment
READ MORE ON » World | Wheat | Sanctions | Regional | Pakistan | Narendra Modi | India
iran-sanction.jpg

India and Iran agreed that India would help develop Iran's Chahbahar port that would enable it to trade with Afghanistan unimpeded by Pakistan.
Budget 2017:
Budget 2017 is out: Read how it impacts you and India
WASHINGTON: India, a major buyer of oil from Iran, has implemented UN-mandated sanctions against it, a bipartisan Congressional report has said amid the Trump Administration's efforts to muster international support against Tehran after conducting a missile test.

The independent Congressional Research Service (CRS) said in its latest report said that India began reducing economic relations with Iran in 2010 when India's central bank ceased using a Tehran-based regional body, the Asian Clearing Union, to handle transactions with Iran.

"India implemented UN-mandated sanctions against Iran and generally cooperated with multilateral efforts to use sanctions to achieve a nuclear agreement with Iran," the report which was presented to lawmakers yesterday.

CRS is the independent research wing of the US Congress which prepares periodic report on issues of interest for lawmakers for them to make informed decisions. Its report are not considered as official report of the US Congress.

In its 42-page report CRS notes that during 2010-2016, India's private sector described Iran as a "controversial market" -- a term used by many international firms to describe markets that entail reputational and financial risks.

In January 2012, Iran agreed to accept India's currency rupee to settle 45 per cent of its oil sales to India, which Iran mostly used to buy Indian wheat, pharmaceuticals, rice, sugar, soybeans, auto parts and other products.

"India reduced its imports of Iranian oil substantially after 2011 - by the time of the JPA, Iran was only supplying about six per cent of India's oil imports, down from over 16 per cent in 2008. India incurred significant costs to retrofit refineries that were handling Iranian crude. However, since the JCPOA, oil imports apparently have increased to close to 2011 levels," the report said.

Indian firms ended or slowed work on investments in Iranian oil and gas fields--work that is likely to resume now that sanctions have been lifted, CRS said, adding that India and Iran are considering using Turkey's Halkbank to transfer to Iran USD 6.5 billion for oil purchased by India during 2012-2016.

In 2015, India and Iran agreed that India would help develop Iran's Chahbahar port that would enable it to trade with Afghanistan unimpeded by Pakistan.

"With sanctions on Iran now lifted, that project no longer entails risk to Indian firms involved. In May 2016, Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi visited Iran and signed an agreement to invest USD 500 million to develop the port and related infrastructure," CRS said.

The report came as US President Donald Trump criticised Iran over its actions. The White House put Iran "on notice" over the move and vowed to take action, setting the stage for confrontation between the two nations.


http://economictimes.indiatimes.com...tions-on-iran-report/articleshow/57016107.cms
 
Last edited:
.
India always continued to buy oil from Iran, even when Obama had them under sanction, while all nations stopped.

Trump wont be able to stop Iran-India relationship
 
.
India cooperated to implement UN-mandated sanctions against Iran: US Report


India, a major buyer of oil from Iran, has implemented UN-mandated sanctions against it, a bipartisan Congressional report has said amid the Trump administration’s efforts to muster international support against Tehran after conducting a missile test.

The independent Congressional Research Service (CRS) said in its latest report said that India began reducing economic relations with Iran in 2010 when India’s central bank ceased using a Tehran-based regional body, the Asian Clearing Union, to handle transactions with Iran.

“India implemented UN-mandated sanctions against Iran and generally cooperated with multilateral efforts to use sanctions to achieve a nuclear agreement with Iran,” the report which was presented to lawmakers on Monday.

CRS is the independent research wing of the US Congress which prepares periodic report on issues of interest for lawmakers for them to make informed decisions. Its report are not considered as official report of the US Congress.

In its 42-page report CRS notes that during 2010-2016, India’s private sector described Iran as a “controversial market” a term used by many international firms to describe markets that entail reputational and financial risks.

In January 2012, Iran agreed to accept India’s currency rupee to settle 45% of its oil sales to India, which Iran mostly used to buy Indian wheat, pharmaceuticals, rice, sugar, soybeans, auto parts and other products.

“India reduced its imports of Iranian oil substantially after 2011 - by the time of the JPA, Iran was only supplying about six per cent of India’s oil imports, down from over 16% in 2008. India incurred significant costs to retrofit refineries that were handling Iranian crude. However, since the JCPOA, oil imports apparently have increased to close to 2011 levels,” the report said.

Indian firms ended or slowed work on investments in Iranian oil and gas fields—work that is likely to resume now that sanctions have been lifted, CRS said, adding that India and Iran are considering using Turkey’s Halkbank to transfer to Iran $6.5 billion for oil purchased by India during 2012-2016.

In 2015, India and Iran agreed that India would help develop Iran’s Chahbahar port that would enable it to trade with Afghanistan unimpeded by Pakistan.

“With sanctions on Iran now lifted, that project no longer entails risk to Indian firms involved. In May 2016, Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi visited Iran and signed an agreement to invest $500 million to develop the port and related infrastructure,” CRS said.

The report came as US President Donald Trump criticised Iran over its actions. The White House put Iran “on notice” over the move and vowed to take action, setting the stage for confrontation between the two nations.


http://www.hindustantimes.com/india...n-us-report/story-oCAZLc2vWSU9ZYp835ttgO.html
 
. . . . . .
I am sure Indian policymakers are aware about what's happening or gonna happen whether Trump or not..
History suggests we have always coincides with Iran without ditching US.

If tensions keep ratcheting up

Irans keeps testing
And if Trump and his jew and right wing handlers keep pushing
Then it will get more difficult
 
.
I think it is better for India not to rely on Iran for any oil supply. Iran has been instable in its foreign policy ever since the clergy's rise to power in 1979 - and the clergy are very ideological ruling class (as opposed to being pragmatic). I wouldn't risk the relationship with the US for pleasing some Iranian clergymen.
 
.
I think it is better for India not to rely on Iran for any oil supply. Iran has been instable in its foreign policy ever since the clergy's rise to power in 1979 - and the clergy are very ideological ruling class (as opposed to being pragmatic). I wouldn't risk the relationship with the US for pleasing some Iranian clergymen.

Iranian light crude is, on a weight-basis, preferable to heavier crude from other sources. I agree that the clergy is ideological but Indian commercial ties with Iran have remained largely unaffected by the revolution and the two countries have no conflicting foreign policy goals. India also managed to continue trading with Iran despite Obama's unrelenting sanctions against Iran in the late 2000s.
 
. . . .
Back
Top Bottom