What's new

Incorporate Fata into full political life of Pakistan: US

Durrani

FULL MEMBER

New Recruit

Joined
Feb 23, 2009
Messages
61
Reaction score
0
WASHINGTON: Pakistan should incorporate the Federally Administered Tribal Areas into the full political and economical life of the country, bringing the areas on equal par with the rest of the nation, and ending the age-old British system of Political Agents and Comissioners, says US special envoy Richard Holbrooke.

The argument, made at a recently congressional hearing, is backed by a veteran lawmaker and former US presidential candidate, Senator John Kerry, and another senior State Department official, Richard Boucher.

Senator Kerry, while supporting Fata’s merger with the NWFP, admits that ‘we're trying to get them (Pakistanis) to do the very thing that they've never been willing to do and no one's been able to do.’

Assistant Secretary Boucher, who ran the State Department’s South Asian bureau for more than three years, however, believes that the Pakistanis are capable of doing this, ‘but it has to be a Pakistani decision … made through an internal political process’ and not under coercion or international pressure.

Selig Harrison, the author of the report ‘Pakistan: The State of the Union,’ based on a six-month study of ethnic tensions in Pakistan, suggests uniting NWFP and Fata, and follow it up by a consolidation of those areas and Pashtun enclaves in Balochistan and Punjab into a single unified ‘Pashtunkhwa’ province that enjoys the autonomy envisioned in the 1973 constitution.

The future of Fata is now a hot topic in Washington, discussed regularly at various think-tanks and in television talks shows and newspaper columns.

An article in the prestigious Foreign Policy magazine wants the Pakistan army to be ‘ruthless’ in crushing the Taliban in Swat and Fata and advises America to ‘back up that ruthlessness with tactics and firepower.’

The suggestion corroborates a recent Dawn report that American policy planners are urging the Pakistani military to turn their guns on the militants in Fata once the fight in Swat is over.

US officials, however, are not yet talking about a military offensive. Instead, they want Pakistani political parties – both in and outside the government – to launch the process for integrating Fata with the rest of the country, at least politically.

‘Many of us believe that one thing that should be done is to take the Federally Administered Tribal Area and incorporate them into the full political life of Pakistan,’ says Ambassador Holbrooke.

‘President Zardari has said he'd like to do that. Nawaz Sharif says he would favour it. I would hope the Pakistani government would consider moving on this. It's been out there for many years.’

Senator Kerry recalls that it were the British who created Fata in acknowledgement of the complications of the Pashtun and tribal presence there.

The present border of approximately 1,500 miles between Afghanistan and Pakistan was agreed upon in a treaty signed on Nov. 12 1893, in Kabul by Sir Mortimer Durand, representing British India, and Abd al-Rahman, emir of Afghanistan.

‘Lord Durand drew a line right smack through the Pashtun, sort of dividing them, partly in Afghanistan, partly in Pakistan,’ notes Senator Kerry. ‘And, in effect, the Pakistanis acknowledged, by omission and commission over the years, what they chose not to do, that they were sort of happy to leave it be tribally administered and not centrally integrated into Pakistan.’

He recalls discussing this issue with former President Pervez Musharraf in Karachi a few years ago. ‘And he talked about the complications and how difficult it was and … underscored to me the reluctance, on behalf of some folks, to deal with this issue, partly because the tribal structure of the areas has come in handy for the Pakistani Government to wage strategic wars in India and Afghanistan by creating Jihadis to fight their proxy-wars.’

Senator Kerry notes that Alexander the Great, the British and the Soviets all found enormous difficulty in trying to tame and control that part of the world.

‘Now, we are sort of at this crucible … how do we keep our interests from being extended beyond what they really are or what is achievable?’ he asks.

Ambassador Holbrooke, while discussing sensitivities attached to this issue, notes that the Durand Line is one of those world borders that ‘leave a constant problem and dissatisfaction.’

‘This arrangement … while very romantic for readers of Flashman novels … is not a good way to run that area,’ he adds.

The US envoy for Afghanistan and Pakistan notes that until 9/11, the tribal system ran itself. Then the United States drove the Taliban east, they nested in this area, the US and Pakistan ignored what was happening. ‘And as they nested, they festered, and they realised that not only did they have a nice sanctuary to counterattack Afghanistan, they had a nice place from which to recruit and focus on the East as well.’

While urging Pakistan to initiate the political process for merging Fata with the rest of the country, Ambassador Holbrooke notes that a proposal to triple US aid to Pakistan also provides more funds in one bill than the United States has spent in that area since 9/11.

‘That is one of the reasons we are so enthusiastic about it. It's long overdue,’ he adds. ‘And I cannot offer you solutions today, Mr. Chairman,’ says the envoy while addressing Senator Kerry. ‘But I can offer you a significant redirection in American emphasis and focus.’

Senator Richard Lugar, the senior Republican on the Senate Committee on Foreign Relations, emphasises the need for the new US policy for Fata to be ‘different from the in an out business with the military’ approach that Washington adopted after 9/11.

Mr Holbrooke backed him, adding that he believes that the money the Bush administration allocated for Fata —$750 million for five years – was ‘pathetic amount of money given the importance of that area.’

A bill now before the US Senate offers $600 million in 2009 alone, for education, health, employment and law enforcement in Fata. ‘It sounds like a lot but it is not, in my view, as much as the problem needs.’
 
.
This makes do sense to me and with the U.S. and the international community to provide support ($$) to engage in the transition, the proposition holds the potential of being exercised successfully.


To manage this tranition both the FC, Police service and the Fauj will have to bear increased recruitment, for at least a period of 10 to 15 years to ensure challeneges and there are bound to be armed challenges can be dealt with quickly, successfully.

For 7 and 1/2 years some Pakistani have been arguing that what can succeed in Afghnistan that is to say building infrastructure, can and should alos be part of the strategy of tranition towards the application of representation and the applicatioon of the Pakistani legal system and government services.
 
.
Good suggestions, except for Selig Harrison's of amalgamating the 'Pashtun enclaves' of Punjab and Baluchistan into a 'Pakhtunkhwa province'.

We are Pakistanis first and foremost, and it is in fact desirable that all provinces have residents comprised of multiple ethnicities - whether it be Baluchistan or Punjab.

In fact, 'amalgamating' FATA and PATA into the political mainstream may be easier as separate provinces, rather than absorbing them into the NWFP/Pakhtunkhwa, since it might alleviate the concerns of the more 'traditional and conservative' Pakhtun Tribesmen that they would have a say in how the region was governed.
 
.
AM

Once this transition is effected, Pakistan needs to have between 30 to 50 provinces based on population and geographical size -- Pakistan cannot continue to be a collection of ethnic states. We all want a single Pakistan and a single Pakistani ethic, not that regional and sub regional identities will cease to exist, just that the Pakistani ethic will come first.
 
.
AM

Once this transition is effected, Pakistan needs to have between 30 to 50 provinces based on population and geographical size -- Pakistan cannot continue to be a collection of ethnic states. We all want a single Pakistan and a single Pakistani ethic, not that regional and sub regional identities will cease to exist, just that the Pakistani ethic will come first.

Completely agree. It may have been Araz who at one point suggested that the provinces be created on the basis of the 26 divisions we used to have.
 
.
It depends upon what the people of that area want? Certainly we don't need suggestions from the US over how to govern a certain area. What matters is that people of that area being given a choice and let them choose and whatever the decision maybe, we need to find a way to in cooperate their choice into the larger system in a such a way that equal opportunities would exist for all irrespective of the system of governance.
 
.
Few doubts :

1. What is it that the US suggests that Pk could not have come upon themselves ? If it is such a good idea what were Pk leaders doing for the last 60+ yrs. Surely this must have crossed their minds too & if they didn't do so there must be reasons..

2. For my education, what is the present arrangement to govern these places & why is it diff from the rest of Pk ?
 
.
if development such as roads, schools, hospitals, buildings are built then FATA will be fertile for political interest but without the development they will take it as imposing ur will on them and its obvious how those people take that
 
.
Completely agree. It may have been Araz who at one point suggested that the provinces be created on the basis of the 26 divisions we used to have.

How could I have suggested anything sensible!!Shame on me!!:lol:: On a serious note, the more I look at development of Karachi under the present nazim, and the accessibility of the councillors to the people, the more it seems logical to have small provinces with local control, devolution and equal representation of the provinces in the centre, in the national assembly/Senate. Cut out all the crap in between. If you stand in one place, you need to be a resident of that locality for at least 5 yrs, and you cannot stand from another area.
You can then develop the system from there and even ally one big centre to share some of its resources with another province for a short period to develop the resources and make them stand on their feet. The province should not be in the viscinity,ie karachi should be allied with a small province in say Punjab and lahore with a province in baluchistan and so on and so forth.
I also feel we will be better served by a president rather than the PM, but this is up for debate.
WaSalam
Araz
 
.
if development such as roads, schools, hospitals, buildings are built then FATA will be fertile for political interest but without the development they will take it as imposing ur will on them and its obvious how those people take that

i think the priority is provision of jobs and then allying the jobs with a need to acquire education. Knowing the people and their industriousness, something mechanical would be more to their nature. Once the area starts generating money, you canreinvest it into regeneration of the area.I dont think education on an empty stomach will work and we simply do not have enough money to develop the infrastructure in the area unless we have a cogent reason to do so.
WaSalam
Araz
 
.
i think the priority is provision of jobs and then allying the jobs with a need to acquire education. Knowing the people and their industriousness, something mechanical would be more to their nature. Once the area starts generating money, you canreinvest it into regeneration of the area.I dont think education on an empty stomach will work and we simply do not have enough money to develop the infrastructure in the area unless we have a cogent reason to do so.
WaSalam
Araz

i agree with what ur saying but there is also the political consequences u have the economic side bang on but also by providing them with facilities the rest of the state has it reinforces the mentality that their are part of pakistan not thier own village or tribebecause they are being proovided this only because of their nationality. having development people can take pride in will do wonders for their suppourt to pakistan because there is alot of seperatist ideology there because they have been isolated and under alot of talib influence.
 
.
gud idea but it does not necessarily mean that this will bring development. Extra steps need to be taken achieve development. FATA should first be economicaly integrated with rest of pakistan and only then we can think of political integration. Once ppl start seein light at the end of the tunnel only then they will agree to this. otherwise it might irritate ppl espacially tribal elders who obviously will be loosin authority if this idea is implemented.
 
.
gud idea but it does not necessarily mean that this will bring development. Extra steps need to be taken achieve development. FATA should first be economicaly integrated with rest of pakistan and only then we can think of political integration. Once ppl start seein light at the end of the tunnel only then they will agree to this. otherwise it might irritate ppl espacially tribal elders who obviously will be loosin authority if this idea is implemented.

i think getting the approval of tribals for the initial development will go a long way in assuring development continues in the long run i think meet basic needs and hear peoples complaints and get their basic needs sorted out i do agree there is a lot to be done but its got to be done its unaviodable
 
.
100% agreed with Holbrooke....should bring FATA in main stream politics , one should be hold responsible for any type of social unrest. Otherwise FCR is total injustice. Some one else do the crime and somone else pay the price.
 
.
Political and economic parity would be desirable. But economic parity isn't going to be given, even if political parity was. Development is a key issue though.

As far as incorporating the region into the politics of Pakistan, it would depend on what was meant. If it meant subjecting the FATA people to the mainstream laws etc, that isn't possible without a referendum. Best to develop the area, focus on education, and then see how things go. Needs more money though.
 
.
Back
Top Bottom