What's new

In Yogi Adityanath's UP, Muslims put out banners to build Ram temple

Levina

BANNED
Joined
Sep 16, 2013
Messages
15,278
Reaction score
59
Country
India
Location
United Arab Emirates
In Yogi Adityanath's UP, Muslims put out banners to build Ram temple
Some Muslims organisations have put out huge banners in Lucknow supporting construction of Ram temple at Ayodhya. The man behind these banners has sought security from police for his 'bold' step.

By Shiv Pujan Jha |
March 30, 2017
lucknow-poster-story_647_033017014638.jpg

Two significant developments have taken place with regard to the question of building Ram temple at Ayodhya since Uttar Pradesh Assembly elections.

Yogi Adityanath, an ardent votary of building Ram temple at the disputed site in Ayodhya, has taken oath as the Chief Minister of Uttar Pradesh and the Supreme Court has suggested out of court settlement of the title suit.

Now, some Muslim organisations have put out big banners in Lucknow supporting construction of Ram temple at Ayodhya. They claim that the hoardings and banners were put out after the Supreme Court called for amicable settlement of the dispute through dialogue between the parties.

Interestingly, the BJP is yet to spell out its own plan of action for Ram temple at Ayodhya. The party had included the issue in its poll manifesto and Yogi Adityanath had also promised to move in that direction if the BJP was voted to power. He went on to swear in as the UP Chief Minister.

THE PRO-TEMPLE BANNERS

Azam Khan, the president of Sri Ram Mandir Nirman Muslim Kar Sevak Manch, put out 10 these hoardings across Lucknow to move forward in the direction as 'suggested' by the Supreme Court.

Azam Khan set up a group of like-minded Muslims post-Supreme Court's advice. He has been trying to build a consensus on the issue within the community.



Flanked by two gun-wielding private guards, Azam Khan has no hesitation chanting Jai Shree Ram. He says Ram is as respectable to Muslims as to any Hindu.

A fairly large number of youths have joined him. The group minces no words criticising the religious leaders of both communities for driving a wedge between two communities by raking up the issue.

AZAM KHAN SEEKS SECURITY

Azam Khan says that he has been getting constant threat calls for taking the 'bold' step.

Talking to India Today, Azam Khan said, "I have been getting threat on e-mails and phones. I can't identify them. They tell me to leave the issue and rather speak in favor of masjid and work to rebuild the Babri mosque. I was also offered money to abstain from my mission."

An FIR has also been registered in this regard, says Azam Khan, but he is yet to get any security cover from UP police.

Azam Khan claimed that the solution to the Ayodhya dispute can be achieved within minutes if the self-proclaimed religious leaders of the two communities stay away as the aam aadmi from either side has no problem if Ram temple is built.


@StraightShooter @salarsikander @Doordie
Had to tag you guyz to show how you are being mislead.


https://www.google.co.uk/amp/m.indi...nath-muslims-ram-temple-ayodhya/1/916252.html
 
Last edited:
In Yogi Adityanath's UP, Muslims put out banners to build Ram temple
Some Muslims organisations have put out huge banners in Lucknow supporting construction of Ram temple at Ayodhya. The man behind these banners has sought security from police for his 'bold' step.

By Shiv Pujan Jha |
March 30, 2017
lucknow-poster-story_647_033017014638.jpg

Two significant developments have taken place with regard to the question of building Ram temple at Ayodhya since Uttar Pradesh Assembly elections.

Yogi Adityanath, an ardent votary of building Ram temple at the disputed site in Ayodhya, has taken oath as the Chief Minister of Uttar Pradesh and the Supreme Court has suggested out of court settlement of the title suit.

Now, some Muslim organisations have put out big banners in Lucknow supporting construction of Ram temple at Ayodhya. They claim that the hoardings and banners were put out after the Supreme Court called for amicable settlement of the dispute through dialogue between the parties.

Interestingly, the BJP is yet to spell out its own plan of action for Ram temple at Ayodhya. The party had included the issue in its poll manifesto and Yogi Adityanath had also promised to move in that direction if the BJP was voted to power. He went on to swear in as the UP Chief Minister.

THE PRO-TEMPLE BANNERS

Azam Khan, the president of Sri Ram Mandir Nirman Muslim Kar Sevak Manch, put out 10 these hoardings across Lucknow to move forward in the direction as 'suggested' by the Supreme Court.

Azam Khan set up a group of like-minded Muslims post-Supreme Court's advice. He has been trying to build a consensus on the issue within the community.



Flanked by two gun-wielding private guards, Azam Khan has no hesitation chanting Jai Shree Ram. He says Ram is as respectable to Muslims as to any Hindu.

A fairly large number of youths have joined him. The group minces no words criticising the religious leaders of both communities for driving a wedge between two communities by raking up the issue.

AZAM KHAN SEEKS SECURITY

Azam Khan says that he has been getting constant threat calls for taking the 'bold' step.

Talking to India Today, Azam Khan said, "I have been getting threat on e-mails and phones. I can't identify them. They tell me to leave the issue and rather speak in favor of masjid and work to rebuild the Babri mosque. I was also offered money to abstain from my mission."

An FIR has also been registered in this regard, says Azam Khan, but he is yet to get any security cover from UP police.

Azam Khan claimed that the solution to the Ayodhya dispute can be achieved within minutes if the self-proclaimed religious leaders of the two communities stay away as the aam aadmi from either side has no problem if Ram temple is built.


@StraightShooter @salarsikander @Doordie
Had to you guyz to show how you are being mislead.


https://www.google.co.uk/amp/m.indi...nath-muslims-ram-temple-ayodhya/1/916252.html
If you can get to my old post. This is what I suggested. That let the construction of mandir continue and build mosque next to it. Don't like it ? OK, build Islamic research center next to mandir in a secured compound and make prayer hall there Inside The center.

In this way no communal hatred will take place and this Will serve as role models for future generations, that how Indians actually found amicable situation to diffuse unnecessary tension for greater good.
 
Last edited:
If you can get to my old post. This is what I suggested. That let the construction of mandir continue and build mosque next to it. Don't like it ? OK, build Islamic research center next to mandir in a secured compound next mandir and make prayer hall their.
In this way no communal hatred will take place and this Will serve as role models for future generations that how Indians actually found amicable situation to diffuse unnecessary tension fr greater good.

Why do you want them side by side?

Having both side by side is a recipe for disaster.

There should be at least 1 km difference between both structures.
 
OK, build Islamic research center next to mandir in a secured compound next mandir and make prayer hall their.
Sounds good but Sunni waqaf board is hard to convince.
Frankly I would have supported your idea but come to think of it, something over which we have a legal claim,we are expected to share it "to avoid" tensions.
Why isn't the same expected from
the other group?

Are you really that dense or you're just being dump hole Where I can poop ?
No he's right.
Sooner or later both the groups will be at each others neck to split and slice.
 
Summary -:
Year Place Occurance
500 Ayodhya Ram temple was built
1700 Ayodhya Ram temple destroyed by muslim invaders and babri Masjid was built
1992 Ayodhya Babri Masjid is rightly destoyed
2017-18 Ayodhya Ram temple will again be built with all its grace and values

DEAL WITH IT !!!
 
we are expected to share it "to avoid" tensions.
Ok don't then. But mind it will only fuel in more hatred and make others believe that they're being alienated because of religion affiliation. This will serve as an example for future generations and others will follow suit to make even more contributions. If you thinkmof it from justHindu only perspective, then you might as well burn the whole mosque down and Immediately make mandir over it.
Why good will it lead in communities ?
 
Are you really that dense or you're just being dump hole Where I can poop ?
@adil_minhas Another NRI gem.

In the city we live in, I can think of at least five examples I pass daily where Mandir and Masjid are side by side, even sharing a wall. Funny part is, in riots, such areas are the least affected. The mobs attack polarized population strongholds. Like an invasion in war.
 
I am being practical.
And dump hole too. Side by side doesn't mean wall to wall. If that's is what you thought. Then you haven't really grown up or you hold deep grudge.

Off any mature mind could have oikced what I meant by side by side. But you were only interested infueling more hatred while you are far away from india.
How convenient right ?

groups will be at each others neck to split and slice
I wasn't expecting this com you at least. Did you read when I said secured compound? And ofc there will be a space. Who would b fool to think that RAM mandir as big as it is will be next to Islamic center ??
 
If you thinkmof it from justHindu only perspective, then you might as well burn the whole mosque down and Immediately make mandir over it.
It's not about Hindu perception, Muslims support it too.
The article is just about that.



But mind it will only fuel in more hatred and make others believe that they're being alienated because of religion affiliation. This will serve as an example for future generations and others will follow suit to make even more contributions. If you thinkmof it from justHindu only perspective, then you might as well burn the whole mosque down and
You know I don't even mind government building university over that temple. I'm the last person expecting a religious structure over there.
But then come to think of it, there are about 30k-40k small and big temples which had been converted to mosques when India was invaded in its past.
Are we laying any claims over all those mosques? No.
Ram temple is important because it was one of the holy centres that Hindus visited on their pilgrimage.
 
Last edited:
And dump hole too. Side by side doesn't mean wall to wall. If that's is what you thought. Then you haven't really grown up or you hold deep grudge.

Off any mature mind could have oikced what I meant by side by side. But you were only interested infueling more hatred while you are far away from india.
How convenient right ?


I wasn't expecting this com you at least. Did you read when I said secured compound? And ofc there will be a space. Who would b fool to think that RAM mandir as big as it is will be next to Islamic center ??

You do not understand the Hindu-Muslim dynamics. I would even advise that Hindus and Muslims should not even live in the same neighborhoods.
 
It's not about Hindu perception, Muslims support it too.
The article is just about that.




You know I don't even mind government building university over that temple. I'm the last person expecting a religious structure over there.
But then come to think of it, there are about 30k-40k small and big temples which have been converted to mosques when India was invaded in its past.
Are we laying any claims over all those mosques? No.
Ram temple is important because it was one of the holy centres that Hindus visited on their pilgrimage.
In was saying from wider perspective that's all. There's no harm in having Islamic research next to mandir in a secured compound. If it needs be all Hindu area and the impression will be given as such, so be it. Yes, you can claim those mosques, but in long term will it serve any good to india as a whole ? You tell me. While people are fighting over religious mosques and temples, hundreds of children are dyingnof disease and hunger. Don't you find find it ironical ? If either party loves god so much why not actually work with hod creation another human and put this matter into amicable solution satisfying both parties, as suggested by supreme court. If mandir has to be made and no mosque or research center there, then ok, do it! If Muslims won't feel alienated.

But this delicate matter should be handled with caution not make it look like a victory over anything by playing zero sum game. It will only increase the chance of future riots and destroy communities

You do not understand the Hindu-Muslim dynamics. I would even advise that Hindus and Muslims should not even live in the same neighborhoods.
By living in US ?
 

Country Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom