What's new

In letter to NYT, USAID defends programmes in Pakistan

Devil Soul

ELITE MEMBER
Joined
Jun 28, 2010
Messages
22,931
Reaction score
45
Country
Pakistan
Location
Pakistan
In letter to NYT, USAID defends programmes in Pakistan
By Web Desk
Published: September 20, 2015
The United States Agency for International Development (USAID) has defended its programmes in Pakistan in a letter to the editor after theNew York Times published an article questioning why the agency is walking away from legal process in Pakistan and highlighting its failure in making substantial contribution to the country.

The organisation which has been operating in Pakistan for nearly a decade, distributing billions of dollars, was criticised for having made “minimal impact on the ground”, according to the article. Further, critics accused the agency of taking up projects with little consideration for local concerns and being needlessly reliant on American contractors with “little development experience”.

Despite extensive criticism about its efficacy, some experts also acknowledged that the agency has been a victim of anti-American sentiment in Pakistan.


Raza Rumi, a fellow at the National Endowment for Democracy in Washington, who has also worked in Pakistan’s development sector said: “I would not say it’s been a failure — they’ve invested money in energy and education — but because of anti-Americanism and their own inability to effectively communicate, this hasn’t been seen.”

“They’ve spent so much money in FATA,” he added, referring to the Federally Administered Tribal Areas. “The reality is no one actually knows the result.”

However, the agency argued that article on the United States development assistance to Pakistan should not ignore that USAID “has contributed to dramatic improvements in the quality of life for the citizens of Pakistan.”


In a letter penned to the editor, Larry Sampler, the assistant to the administrator for Afghanistan and Pakistan affairs, USAID, claimed the agency has improved the lives of millions of people in Pakistan whilst enhancing American national security. Further, he said USAID has helped “decrease newborn deaths by 23%” in areas in which it operated and “increased access to electricity for over 17 million Pakistanis” as well as improved the reading skills of 120,000 children, which “should make both Americans and Pakistanis proud”.
 
. .
Before telling us what they have done they should also mention nuke deal with India which was refused to us, non delivery of F16s despite payment and the Presler Amendment. USAID is only compensating us for our losses.
 
.
The losses incurred, by the WoT, on Pakistan are estimated to be around 100 billion dollars and this is in addition to the thousands of innocent Pakistanis killed. What about making some memorials in honouring the people who sacrificed their lives like 9/11 victims.
 
.
NYTLetter.jpg
 
. .
In letter to NYT, USAID defends programmes in Pakistan
By Web Desk
Published: September 20, 2015
The United States Agency for International Development (USAID) has defended its programmes in Pakistan in a letter to the editor after theNew York Times published an article questioning why the agency is walking away from legal process in Pakistan and highlighting its failure in making substantial contribution to the country.

The organisation which has been operating in Pakistan for nearly a decade, distributing billions of dollars, was criticised for having made “minimal impact on the ground”, according to the article. Further, critics accused the agency of taking up projects with little consideration for local concerns and being needlessly reliant on American contractors with “little development experience”.

Despite extensive criticism about its efficacy, some experts also acknowledged that the agency has been a victim of anti-American sentiment in Pakistan.


Raza Rumi, a fellow at the National Endowment for Democracy in Washington, who has also worked in Pakistan’s development sector said: “I would not say it’s been a failure — they’ve invested money in energy and education — but because of anti-Americanism and their own inability to effectively communicate, this hasn’t been seen.”

“They’ve spent so much money in FATA,” he added, referring to the Federally Administered Tribal Areas. “The reality is no one actually knows the result.”

However, the agency argued that article on the United States development assistance to Pakistan should not ignore that USAID “has contributed to dramatic improvements in the quality of life for the citizens of Pakistan.”


In a letter penned to the editor, Larry Sampler, the assistant to the administrator for Afghanistan and Pakistan affairs, USAID, claimed the agency has improved the lives of millions of people in Pakistan whilst enhancing American national security. Further, he said USAID has helped “decrease newborn deaths by 23%” in areas in which it operated and “increased access to electricity for over 17 million Pakistanis” as well as improved the reading skills of 120,000 children, which “should make both Americans and Pakistanis proud”.
Load of crap. Anti american sentiments ? Havent seen any . On the contrary as i have stated numerous times its US AD NOT USAID. AD as in advertisements , 90% money is spent on ad campaigns of major media houses the rest goes to operational costs and paying fees to their stooges. So net result a big fat zero .
 
.
The Americans are seeing Chinese results which speak volume and it is sour grapes. They are frustrated because they made all the wrong investments. Besides, half of the money is used up by the American non-governmental agencies. There is really no point in defending their record in Pakistan.

The Americans need to understand that the relationship between Pakistan and the US is frankly not what it used to be. So much has happened on both sides. It is better for the Americans to keep investing in their relation with India. Pakistan should focus on China, Russia and other regional countries. We need a very very long time out...
 
.
What US aid is doing amounts to peanuts compared to our contribution in anti soviet and anti terror war
 
.
Back
Top Bottom