What's new

In a first, Chinese newspaper adopts conciliatory tone to border dispute

sasi

FULL MEMBER
Joined
Oct 18, 2012
Messages
404
Reaction score
0
In a first, Chinese newspaper adopts conciliatory tone to border dispute - The Times of India
~
NEW DELHI: "The border issue does not define the 'whole' of the bilateral relationship and should, therefore, not affect the overall development of Sino-Indian relations. Before a final settlement isreached on the border dispute, the two sides must work together to jointly safeguard peace and stability in the border areas."
This is possibly the first "official" commentary by a mainstream Chinese daily newspaper, and is surprisingly pacific. The Guangming Daily, a newspaper run by the Chinese Communist Party's Central Committee which targets intellectuals, has taken an almost conciliatory view of the 1962 war and the border problem between China and India. The platform and content of the article are being seen as significant.
~
In the past month, while Indian media and the commentariat have written and spoken extensively on the 1962 conflict, more often than not focusing on Indian failures and Chinese "duplicity", Chinese media, which is extensively state-controlled, has remained largely silent, with only a few newspapers like Liberation Daily and Global Times (which are also state-owned but carry less weight) publishing commentaries or refuting claims like the one by Indian Air Force chief N A KBrowne that the outcome ofthe war might have been different if the IAF had been pressed into service.
~
For the first time, the Chinese "line" seems to become clearer. The comment, written by Lu Yang, says, "Once, our two countries went to war in the very same border region - but the smoke of that conflict has long dispersed."
~
Asserting, in Manmohan Singh-like terms, that "the world is large enough for India and China to strengthen cooperation with each other in order to achieve common development and prosperity", the commentary details the number of agreements on the border issue, including the most recent "new mechanism (which) provides a new platform for the two sides to communicate and grasp a developing situation in a timely way, as well as allows for more effective protection of peace and tranquility in the border areas".
~
The article notes the "healthy and stable development" of bilateral relations between China and India, the peaceful border and "regular stream of consultations through a variety of mechanisms",which it says, has reached "an important consensus".
China also appears to reaffirm the 2005 Political Parameters and Guiding Principles agreement. In reality, it has walked back from a key provision in that agreement, so an affirmation of the pact is significant.
~
The article goes on to state that India and China, two developing economies,need a peaceful environment in which to flourish. Here may lie the key to the commentary. China's eastern front is in the thick of a storm due to disputes with Japan, Philippines and Vietnam among others. In the run up to the all-important once-in-a-decade leadership change, ironically, China's most peaceful border is with India.
~
This, sources said, may be one of the reasons behind these soothing tones from Beijing.
_
 
.
"Once, our two countries went to war in the very same border region - but the smoke of that conflict has long dispersed."
I don't understand what does 'the very same border region' mean.Maybe it a automatic error for 'the very small border region',as you know that 6~9 square kilometres is so small to China and could be ignored by many chinese in their minds,but some one like me don't think so.
 
. .
In a first, Chinese newspaper adopts conciliatory tone to border dispute - The Times of India
~
NEW DELHI: "The border issue does not define the 'whole' of the bilateral relationship and should, therefore, not affect the overall development of Sino-Indian relations. Before a final settlement isreached on the border dispute, the two sides must work together to jointly safeguard peace and stability in the border areas."
This is possibly the first "official" commentary by a mainstream Chinese daily newspaper, and is surprisingly pacific. The Guangming Daily, a newspaper run by the Chinese Communist Party's Central Committee which targets intellectuals, has taken an almost conciliatory view of the 1962 war and the border problem between China and India. The platform and content of the article are being seen as significant.
~
In the past month, while Indian media and the commentariat have written and spoken extensively on the 1962 conflict, more often than not focusing on Indian failures and Chinese "duplicity", Chinese media, which is extensively state-controlled, has remained largely silent, with only a few newspapers like Liberation Daily and Global Times (which are also state-owned but carry less weight) publishing commentaries or refuting claims like the one by Indian Air Force chief N A KBrowne that the outcome ofthe war might have been different if the IAF had been pressed into service.
~
For the first time, the Chinese "line" seems to become clearer. The comment, written by Lu Yang, says, "Once, our two countries went to war in the very same border region - but the smoke of that conflict has long dispersed."
~
Asserting, in Manmohan Singh-like terms, that "the world is large enough for India and China to strengthen cooperation with each other in order to achieve common development and prosperity", the commentary details the number of agreements on the border issue, including the most recent "new mechanism (which) provides a new platform for the two sides to communicate and grasp a developing situation in a timely way, as well as allows for more effective protection of peace and tranquility in the border areas".
~
The article notes the "healthy and stable development" of bilateral relations between China and India, the peaceful border and "regular stream of consultations through a variety of mechanisms",which it says, has reached "an important consensus".
China also appears to reaffirm the 2005 Political Parameters and Guiding Principles agreement. In reality, it has walked back from a key provision in that agreement, so an affirmation of the pact is significant.
~
The article goes on to state that India and China, two developing economies,need a peaceful environment in which to flourish. Here may lie the key to the commentary. China's eastern front is in the thick of a storm due to disputes with Japan, Philippines and Vietnam among others. In the run up to the all-important once-in-a-decade leadership change, ironically, China's most peaceful border is with India.
~
This, sources said, may be one of the reasons behind these soothing tones from Beijing.
_

Intresting Article - Specially AFTER - Prime Minister Yoshihiko Noda seeking closer security alliance between Japan and India.
Is the article from Chinese a Tongue and Cheek STATEMENT!!
 
.
Intresting Article - Specially AFTER - Prime Minister Yoshihiko Noda seeking closer security alliance between Japan and India.
Is the article from Chinese a Tongue and Cheek STATEMENT!!

Based on CPC mouthpiece.
~
No warning. Come on guys,thist is boring.
~
Time for warning ?
 
.
China always says as that, but no one want translated it into English for peace view never attracting readers eyes, only offensive words can attacting peoples eye; as India VS China thread always got many many peoples reply
 
.
China always says as that, but no one want translated it into English for peace view never attracting readers eyes, only offensive words can attacting peoples eye; as India VS China thread always got many many peoples reply

Then, why didn't chinese members post it? So that we have broader view on the matter.
 
.
Then, why didn't chinese members post it? So that we have broader view on the matter.

Such as fewer Indian post as "I am an Indian, I want to be a Pakistan" in one army forum, but in private, talks is one art of compromise, with less compromise to get agreement
 
.
Both the diplomatic "look east" policy and the buildup of military capability in the east are having its effects. GoI has been playing its cards well WRT china.
 
.
I believe in Sino-indo cooperation .
age of asia has arrived and india -china is destined to take the lead unless they get engaged in conflict which will be beneficiary only for the countries who want to maintain the current status of uni-polar world.
 
.
Such as fewer Indian post as "I am an Indian, I want to be a Pakistan" in one army forum, but in private, talks is one art of compromise, with less compromise to get agreement

Sorry,i didn't get the message. Explain !
 
. .
China and India talked 15 times on boundary problem, may be wei can get an agreement at the 100th talk

85 remaining, for that time being India can play as peaceful player in scs.
 
.
Then, why didn't chinese members post it? So that we have broader view on the matter.

why should we post it?
if we post it,the replies from you guys will be "ccp propaganda"
 
.
You may be right...but again..in each foroum crap posters are there from both China and India side too...you should always observe and take a note of the response from few people makes sense....Others...they just go by emotions..How does it matter what they say????....

China is a destined to be a leader of Asia...Now think about it....Can china afford to delay its progress with so much conflict around its immediate neoighor?

The significant factor for which Indian gets irritaed when China being a lead power in Asia takes blind support of Pakistan...I feel that created a lot of trust deficit for us....In case the rivallary between India and China as one on one basis then there would have been a perception difference from India towards China, which is not happening as of now....
 
.
Back
Top Bottom