What's new

Imran Khan wins America

PaklovesTurkiye

SENIOR MEMBER
Joined
Dec 1, 2015
Messages
7,448
Reaction score
10
Country
Pakistan
Location
Pakistan
By Adam Garrie
Published: July 22, 2019

85935-washingtonjpg-1563796842-454-640x480.jpg

Prime Minister Imran Khan giving his speech at the Captial One arena in Washington during his US visit. PHOTO: FACEBOOK/IMRAN KHAN OFFICIAL

It was a Sunday night and Washington’s large Capital One Arena was packed. But it wasn’t packed for basketball or a music concert; it was 20,000 people who came to listen to Pakistan Prime Minister Imran Khan. It was at this moment when on a cultural level, decades ofmistrust and bad blood between Pakistan and the United States (US) evaporated.

Prior to the formation of Imran’s government, Pakistan’s prime ministers were the kind of people who could only fill large public squares at home by mobilising a network of bribery and patronage. Such politicians could not attract any great attention abroad or in places where the system of feudal political patronage does not exist.

But the people who came to listen to Imran were not paid or coaxed; many in fact came from all over the US at their own cost in order to see Imran in the flesh. When he took to the stage, flanked by both a Pakistan and American flag, it was as though a new era was born – one which carried with it the spirit of the 1980s, which was the last time that Pakistan and the US cooperated on an equal footing against a clearly defined and easily recognisable common enemy.

What’s more is that when speaking of a desire to create opportunities for Pakistanis to advance their worldly condition on a level playing field, he was speaking the language of political optimism that once defined American politics. But whilst American politics grows ever more cynical, Imran assured his audience of 20,000 that a forward looking ‘Naya Pakistan’ is being built for them and for their children.

Although most of the audience were Pakistani-Americans, there were surely a good number of Americans in the arena present with no connection to Pakistan. This of course includes those working at the large facility. They too would have seen and heard Imran and they would have realised that the man before them was speaking American insofar as celebrity is a major element of the broader American culture.

More importantly, Donald Trump, who shortly awaits his meeting with Imran, would have seen the footage. Above all else, Trump likes someone who looks and acts like a success. As someone who himself packs arenas for frequent political rallies, Trump will likewise recognise in Imran someone who is a formidable figure with a global appeal.

This contrasts sharply with the parochial, pretty and lowly style of politicians that Pakistan has produced since the 1990s. Such people simply do not turn heads outside of their own circles within parts of Pakistan and this has helped the international enemies of Pakistan to inflict damage on Pakistan’s reputation. Without a leader whose reach is global, few listened to Pakistan over the last 25 years, and in many respects, Pakistan’s leaders hadn’t even tried to get their point across outside of Pakistan’s borders.

With Imran, this has changed. He is a superstar and whilst his government’s sometimes lax security policies against certain seditious and foreign threats are clearly fit for criticism, there are signs of improvement which should not only be applauded but encouraged.

Although Imran’s meeting with Trump will be about more than symbolism, in politics as in life, symbolism is highly important. For Trump in particular, the personal and the political are deeply intertwined and as such, Imran’s mass rally in Washington will certainly be a pleasant conversation starter between the two leaders.

Even before Imran and Trump speak about key issues regarding resuming proper bilateral ties, Imran has won America. In a country that since 2001 was programmed by its fake news media to hate Pakistan, in a country where Islamic societies are often misunderstood and in a country whose arenas are usually filled with sporting or music events rather than anything remotely political, Imran stole the show. Even if his rally is played for 20 seconds on America’s notorious television news programmes, this is a victory for Pakistan because all it would take is 20 seconds of footage from Imran’s rally to change perceptions of Pakistan; from one that is wholly negative to one that is self-evidently optimistic and indeed one that is inspirational.

While the petty figures of Islamabad’s old elite continue to yell, Imran has done something that even many European celebrities find hard to do: he conquered America’s heart and he did it with dignity, charm and sincerity. This simply cannot be denied.

https://blogs.tribune.com.pk/story/85935/imran-khan-wins-america/
 
. . .
GettyImages-1163577596.png

Mark Wilson/Getty Images
JOHN HAYWARD 22 Jul 2019
Pakistani Prime Minister Imran Khan addressed a crowd of some 30,000 Pakistani-Americans in Washington, DC, on Sunday, promising that under his administration a “new Pakistan” is “being created in front of your eyes.”

Khan arrived in the United States with several of his top ministers on a trip that included a meeting with U.S. President Donald Trump on Monday. His Sunday speech at the Capitol One Arena was applauded by Gulf News as “a proud moment for Pakistanis around the world” and a “rock star’s welcome” for the visiting prime minister, who was formerly an international cricket star.


“You’re looking at the largest gathering of Pakistani-Americans in history,” one attendee told Gulf News.

Khan’s speech extolled the virtues of his “Naya Pakistan” (New Pakistan) campaign platform, which combines promises to combat corruption, streamline government, and reward merit with Pakistani nationalism and Islamic religious themes.

“23 years ago, I came into politics. I said one thing and on that same note, I’ll end my address. I said that I have never bowed my head in front of anyone to date except for Allah. I will, inshallah, never let my nation bow its head in front of anyone,” he said at the conclusion of his speech. “Inshallah” means “as Allah wills.”


Khan was eager to stress the differences between his platform and previous Pakistani administrations, which tended to have short, disappointing lifespans and abrupt conclusions. The modern state of Pakistan has had 18 prime ministers over the past seven decades, and none of themhas ever completed their last elected or appointed term in office.

At one point, Khan cracked a little joke about his predecessors by saying the traditional government answer to citizens who ask tough questions has been “Kyun nikala.” This was former Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif’s campaign slogan in 2017 after he was removed from office during the Panama Papers corruption scandal, roughly translating to “Why was I kicked out?”

Sharif meant to imply he was ousted through skulduggery in a soft coup, while Khan used the phrase mockingly to suggest many Pakistan officials have been clueless, corrupt, and unresponsive to the people.

“Today, what you see happening in Pakistan is what Naya Pakistan was about: these people had never been asked for answers before,” he said.


Khan expressed admiration for America’s system of meritocracy, faulting previous Pakistani governments for imposing a “type of monarchy” through political dynasties that prevented the best and most honest people from rising to the top of public service, along with socialist policies that caused the economy to become stagnant.

“A society that doesn’t have merit doesn’t go forward,” he said. “Democracy is successful when the leadership is answerable.”

Khan insisted his anti-corruption crusade is not a political vendetta and stressed that the high-profile cases currently making their way through Pakistani courtrooms predate his administration. He said his goal was to restore the more honest and efficient government bureaucracy that was the envy of the region in his youth.

Khan promised to recover funds that were misspent or stolen by the previous administration, going so far as to pledge he would remove the air conditioners and televisions from the prison cells of Sharif and other corruption prisoners to help repay the public debt. Sharif was sentencedto seven years in prison for corruption in late 2018.


“It is very easy to be released from jail,” he said. “Return the money and we will release you from jail.”

The prime minister said his PTI party is “the first party where no relative or friend of Imran Khan is in any post.” He said his party is interested in developing new leaders, not serving the interests of powerful families.

“Our country will rise before you. You will see we will fix the system and let the lower segment come up,” he said.

Khan promised his Pakistani-American audience that he would “not let you be embarrassed in front of Donald Trump.” The two leaders met on Monday after months of jousting on social media over Trump’s accusations that Pakistan has not done enough to combat terrorism, although the American president expressedsatisfaction last week after Pakistan arrested Hafiz Saeed, the accused mastermind of the horrific 2008 terrorist attack on Mumbai.


Trump said before the meeting that he was particularly eager to secure Khan’s assistance in Afghanistan.

“I have plans on Afghanistan. If I wanted to win, it would be wiped off the face of the earth. I don’t want to do that,” Trump said on Monday, suggesting Khan could use Pakistan’s leverage to arrange a better outcome.

“There is no military solution in Afghanistan. If you go all-out military, millions and millions of people will die,” Khan agreed after meeting with Trump.

Trump made a reciprocal offer to help mediate Pakistan’s dispute with India over the Kashmir region, a role he said Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi asked him to assume.

“If I can help in the Kashmir issue, I will help. If I could mediate in the Kashmir issue, I would love to help,” Trump told Khan during their meeting, adding that he would “love to go to Pakistan if invited.”

“Yes, it would be in the benefit of billions of people if you do so to solve the long dispute between the two countries,” Khan replied.

India’s Ministry of External Affairs immediately pumped the brakes on this apparent diplomatic breakthrough, insisting that Prime Minister Modi has notasked Trump to mediate on Kashmir and that only bilateral talks with Pakistan are acceptable, assuming Pakistan promises “an end to cross-border terrorism.”

The White House statement on Trump’s meeting with Khan did not mention Kashmir or India but instead applauded Pakistan for taking “initial steps” to “improve regional security and counterterrorism” and stressed the “strong economic relationship” between Pakistan and the United States.


“President Trump wants to build stronger economic and trade ties with Pakistan, which would benefit both of our countries, as we make progress on core United States security concerns,” the White House said
https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.br...0000-pakistani-americans-d-c-meets-trump/amp/
 
. .
The writer is on drugs. The proof of IK conquering American hearts and minds cannot be based on one visit alone. Let us wait and see what happens.
 
.
The writer is on drugs. The proof of IK conquering American hearts and minds cannot be based on one visit alone. Let us wait and see what happens.





And those that belong to the race and nation that calls for the death and destruction of the Pakistani race and nation wouldn't say anything else...........:lol:...........but then AGAIN you guys also claimed to have killed over 300 terrorists in Balakot and shot down an F-16.......:lol:
 
.
. . . . .
ISI info helped CIA track down Osama: Imran Khan.

Is it right ???
If so, is it a new stance of Pakistan in Laden episode ?

“If you ask CIA it was ISI which gave the initial location through the phone connection”
Pakistan’s powerful spy agency ISI (Inter-Services Intelligence) provided information to the CIA which helped the U.S. track down and kill former al-Qaeda chief Osama bin Laden, Prime Minister Imran Khan said on July 22 in a significant revelation as Islamabad had so far denied having any knowledge of the terror chief until he was shot dead in 2011.
Khan, who is visiting Washington on his maiden official trip, revealed this during an interview with Fox News when he was asked whether his country would release jailed Pakistani surgeon Shakeel Afridi who helped the CIA track down Osama.

Khan’s statement is significant because Pakistan had so far denied that it had any information about the hideout of Osama before he was killed in a covert raid by a U.S. Navy SEAL team in Abbottabad, a garrison town north of Islamabad, on May 2, 2011.

“It was ISI that gave the information which led to the location of Osama bin Laden. If you ask CIA it was ISI which gave the initial location through the phone connection,” Khan said.

Responding to questions, Khan was reluctant to give any commitment on the release of Pakistani doctor Afridi. U.S. President Donald Trump is seeking his release. Khan said that the release of Afridi is an “emotive issue” for Pakistan as in Pakistan he is considered a spy for the U.S.
Fighting the war against terrorism
“We in Pakistan always felt that we were an ally of the U.S. and if we had been given the information about Osama, we should have taken him out”, he said. Khan said that Pakistan was fighting the war against terrorism for the U.S. The raid and killing of Osama, he said “hugely embarrassed Pakistan”.

“Here we were an ally of the U.S. and the U.S. did not trust us. And they actually came and bombed and killed a man in our territory”, Khan said. When pointed out that Osama was not just a man, but a terrorist who killed more than 3,000 Americans, Khan said that Pakistan lost 70,000 people in this fight. “We were fighting this war for the US and we lost all these people fighting this war. So there was obviously a lot of anger about the way this whole thing was done. But you know, that’s all in the past.”

When the interviewer said, “You are the Prime Minister, you can make a decision catch”, Khan said, “There’s some decisions...which even a Prime Minister finds it difficult, because we do have an opposition. But this is something that can be negotiated over time.”

https://www.thehindu.com/news/inter...n/article28671278.ece?utm_campaign=socialflow
 
.
The writer is on drugs. The proof of IK conquering American hearts and minds cannot be based on one visit alone. Let us wait and see what happens.


We know what happens next. Pakistan will deliver peace in Afghanistan and Trump will get a second term.
 
.
ISI info helped CIA track down Osama: Imran Khan.

Is it right ???
If so, is it a new stance of Pakistan in Laden episode ?

“If you ask CIA it was ISI which gave the initial location through the phone connection”
Pakistan’s powerful spy agency ISI (Inter-Services Intelligence) provided information to the CIA which helped the U.S. track down and kill former al-Qaeda chief Osama bin Laden, Prime Minister Imran Khan said on July 22 in a significant revelation as Islamabad had so far denied having any knowledge of the terror chief until he was shot dead in 2011.
Khan, who is visiting Washington on his maiden official trip, revealed this during an interview with Fox News when he was asked whether his country would release jailed Pakistani surgeon Shakeel Afridi who helped the CIA track down Osama.

Khan’s statement is significant because Pakistan had so far denied that it had any information about the hideout of Osama before he was killed in a covert raid by a U.S. Navy SEAL team in Abbottabad, a garrison town north of Islamabad, on May 2, 2011.

“It was ISI that gave the information which led to the location of Osama bin Laden. If you ask CIA it was ISI which gave the initial location through the phone connection,” Khan said.

Responding to questions, Khan was reluctant to give any commitment on the release of Pakistani doctor Afridi. U.S. President Donald Trump is seeking his release. Khan said that the release of Afridi is an “emotive issue” for Pakistan as in Pakistan he is considered a spy for the U.S.
Fighting the war against terrorism
“We in Pakistan always felt that we were an ally of the U.S. and if we had been given the information about Osama, we should have taken him out”, he said. Khan said that Pakistan was fighting the war against terrorism for the U.S. The raid and killing of Osama, he said “hugely embarrassed Pakistan”.

“Here we were an ally of the U.S. and the U.S. did not trust us. And they actually came and bombed and killed a man in our territory”, Khan said. When pointed out that Osama was not just a man, but a terrorist who killed more than 3,000 Americans, Khan said that Pakistan lost 70,000 people in this fight. “We were fighting this war for the US and we lost all these people fighting this war. So there was obviously a lot of anger about the way this whole thing was done. But you know, that’s all in the past.”

When the interviewer said, “You are the Prime Minister, you can make a decision catch”, Khan said, “There’s some decisions...which even a Prime Minister finds it difficult, because we do have an opposition. But this is something that can be negotiated over time.”

https://www.thehindu.com/news/inter...n/article28671278.ece?utm_campaign=socialflow

Nothing new in it. This is an old news, which surfaced immediately after Abbottabad episode. IK has only reiterated it.
 
.
Back
Top Bottom