imran khan Great Speech today at UNITY DINNER- Must listen

[Bas_tum_Pak]

Please watch full..

Imran Khan - Zindabad

 

[arushbhai]

isnt that the hypocrite who doesnt like to gamble but gambled himself on cricket? Isnt he the same guy who made a big fuss about the karachi killings but secretly made a deal with altaf hussain and backed off from the case? Isnt he the same guy who did Dharna in peshawar and karachi against NATO supplies but ended up making a deal with the americans and changed his stance to "NATO supplies should be charged a premium, they should not be blocked" lol

 

[Qasibr]

isnt that the hypocrite who doesnt like to gamble but gambled himself on cricket? Isnt he the same guy who made a big fuss about the karachi killings but secretly made a deal with altaf hussain and backed off from the case? Isnt he the same guy who did Dharna in peshawar and karachi against NATO supplies but ended up making a deal with the americans and changed his stance to "NATO supplies should be charged a premium, they should not be blocked" lol

@arushbhai Those are the exact propaganda points PML-N dishes out, but they are easily answered.

* "Hypocrite who doesn't like to gamble but gambled himself on cricket?"

Using his cricket experience, he ADVISED his brother-in-law on how well various players were performing during a match and how long the batsmen would last. Even the brother-in-law wasn't gambling, as in "betting one side would win, and putting money on it". This is like the stock market where your experience tells you one share may go up, and you put money on it. Even Islamic scholars are not in agreement on whether this type of activity("betting" your money on share prices, or "spread betting" whick Imran Khan's brother-in-law did) is akin to gambling(and hence, Haram) or not.

* "He made a big fuss about Karachi killings but secretly made a deal with altaf hussain and backed off from the case?"

I'm afraid that's not true either. He has NOT backed off from the case. The case is still very much open and pending with Scotland Yard, those guys wanted to send a team to Pakistan to investigate and interview victims, but the current government has refused that so far. Given MQM's terrorist tactics and fear, none of the victims have been willing to publically come forward or travel to Britain to give their accounts(given how MQM is suspected of murdered it's own Imran Farooq in Britain, perhaps the victims are rightfully fearful for their safety).

MQM's propaganda presents the Mahajir community as beleaguered and hated by the rest of Pakistan, with MQM being the one and only party looking out for them. And given the way all parties present in Karachi, are engaging in this politics-of-hatred where they spread hatred about other ethnicities and even get those people killed, he does not want to inflame sentiments and instigate more street-killings by giving anti-MQM statements. That would play into the party's propaganda. These days, when blood frequently flows in the streets, flaming up sectarian hatred is unwise.

However, he has unequivocally stated that there can be no question of an alliance with MQM or ANY other party that engages in terrorist activities; and his litigation against Altaf Hussain for his terrorist activities, is still open.

* "Did Dharna against NATO supplies but ended up making a deal with the Americans and changing his stance to NATO supplies should be charged a premium, they should not be blocked. lol"

Wow man.. Imran Khan is making deals with everyone in your mind isn't he. Deals with Altaf Hussain, deals with USA. How about a deal with India, because Imran Khan advocates putting International political pressure on India for Kashmir?

The fact remains, that all these "deals" are mere conjecture on your part. In an intellectual discussion, you have to bring facts to support your assertions. For example, it's an empirical fact that in the late 90's Nawaz Sharif sent Shahbaz to the US to ask for help dealing with the Army - much like the current memogate issue. There is hard, solid evidence that shows this to be true.

About the NATO supplies. IK has been advocating that we not only stop the land-transit of supplies, but completely disengage from this "War on Terror". That means stopping the air-transit of supplies that is still going on, stopping CIA's Raymond davis types from roaming around our country, and everything else.

Given how our present leadership can be expected to cave in after a while, and let the US go back to abusing us the same way they did earlier(drone attacks have already restarted, supplies expected to start very soon as well) - all Imran Khan did was to say that, rather than going back to letting the US supplies wreck our highways like we were, the least we could do is charge them transit fees to repair and build our highways again.

Whew, long answer, I wanted to answer each and every one of your claims completely and logically. And I believe I have done that.