What's new

'If Iranian general can be droned for terrorism, why not a Pakistani general?'

Status
Not open for further replies.
Ohh, let me add a bit more to it. The sentence seemed incomplete.

“If Irani General can be shot down, so can indian generals for Terrorism in IOK, Baloch, Pak”
Ohh, let me add a bit more to it. The sentence seemed incomplete.

“If Irani General can be shot down, so can indian generals for Terrorism in IOK, Baloch, Pak”


It will be a free for all. Every General every other government personnel will be targets... Indian terrorist Hindutva will top that list.

Bring it on.
 
.
"Important point: why aren’t the Americans confronting the Taliban masters in Pakistan in a similar manner? The Taliban and their masters in Rawalpindi are responsible for the killing of 3500 US servicemen in Afghanistan," asked Saad Mohseni, a prominent Afghan entrepreneur.
This Afghan dude must be living in a cave . This is 2020 and India is a SupparPowar. He should ask the Gangus to do something. Of course, we hope SuparPower will show us some mercy and not attack with Gow Cola
 
.
Ohh, let me add a bit more to it. The sentence seemed incomplete.

“If Irani General can be shot down, so can indian generals for Terrorism in IOK, Baloch, Pak”

Unfortunately our media to this day has failed to construct such a narrative at all, compared to the way rabid Indian media has done against us.
 
. .
'If Iranian general can be droned for terrorism, why not a Pakistani general?'

Chidanand Rajghatta | TNN | Updated: Jan 4, 2020, 22:26 IST

WASHINGTON: Amid widespread misgivings in the US Congress and among American analysts about the assassination of a serving general of a sovereign nation, the Trump administration is belatedly making the case that Iranian General

Qassim Suleimani
was a terrorist and a war criminal who should have been targeted a long time ago, even though he was not on any global proscribed list.


In fact, top administration officials are going so far as to link Iran and Suleimani to 9/11, even though the US Commission that carried out a monumental inquiry into the attack found no such connection. The 9/11 attack was carried out by Sunni extremists, mostly from

Saudi Arabia
, who by most accounts had little or no connection to Shia-majority Iran, a hated regional rival.


US vice-president

Mike Pence
was among those who wheeled out this 9/11 connection in a series of tweets listing Suleimani’s purported terrorist activities, alleging that he “assisted in the clandestine travel to Afghanistan of 10 of the 12 terrorists who carried out the September 11 terrorist attacks in the United States.”


Pence was eviscerated by analysts for “gaslighting” the American public, with experts arguing that the idea that Suleimani would assist in 9/11 — knowingly or otherwise — made no sense, because besides being Shia, he actually cooperated with the US government against the Taliban in Afghanistan, which hosted the 9/11 plotters and perpetrators.

Indeed, the assassination of general Suleimani opened a can of worms for the Trump administration with some Af-Pak experts asking why Washington should not target Pakistani generals who have a more established record of backing and carrying out terrorist attacks.


"Important point: why aren’t the Americans confronting the Taliban masters in Pakistan in a similar manner? The Taliban and their masters in Rawalpindi are responsible for the killing of 3500 US servicemen in Afghanistan," asked Saad Mohseni, a prominent Afghan entrepreneur.


And from a US military veteran on Twitter: So Americans killed by a foreign proxy group are worthy of revenge when it is Iran providing the support, but when it is Pakistan supporting the Taliban and HQN killing Americans in AFG they get a peace deal and Pakistan gets aid.


Several US military commanders and administration officials have accused Pakistan’s military intelligence agency ISI of using Taliban proxies to kill American personnel in Afghanistan with no retribution from successive administrations in Washington except for aid cuts and downgraded ties.

Earlier this week, US secretary of state

Mike Pompeo
revealed in a tweet that he had phoned Pakistan's Chief of Staff General Bajwa and to brief him about "US defensive action to kill Qassim Suleimani," adding that "the #Iran regime’s actions in the region are destabilizing and our resolve in protecting American interests, personnel, facilities, and partners will not waver." It was not clear if Pompeo intended it to be a warning to Bajwa and Pakistan, which in the eyes of some US analysts has long carried out a covert proxy war against US forces in Afghanistan.


Separately, Washington is rife with speculation as to why Trump decided to go in for such precipitate action against Suleimani that is resulting in something the President has pointedly sought to avoid: deploying more US troops abroad. One explanation is that Trump felt he looked weak after his 2019 decision to call off an airstrike against Iran after it downed the US surveillance drone.


There is also conjecture that Trump resented being trolled by Suleimani on social media. The Iranian general was apparently quite adept on Twitter, frequently taunting Trump, including calling him a “bartender” and a “casino manager.”


There are also more serious wag-the-dog explanations for the strike, with one prominent American scribe saying it is "hard to decouple his (Sulemani’s) killing from the impeachment saga." Indeed, the impeachment saga has been blown off the news cycle, at least for now.

https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com...-a-pakistani-general/articleshow/73102067.cms


We know how the INDIAN UNION Nazi think :

Already overed here :

https://defence.pk/pdf/threads/mike...leimanis-killing.648183/page-15#post-11989806

They Indian Union should actually try it
- It would open a HUGE pandoras box of SIKH REPRISALS on Indian Union Gestapo figures for 1984 !

The Sikh, Aghan, Naxal and Tamils could be inspired indepedepnedlty by the US move to do their onw vigilante reprisals - it would destroy the indian union economy even further, so perhaps its not worht hte risk for RSS ?


My BET is the Indian Union will try adbuct or use from the ME a hositalised or retired general or really old wilted ex- senior staff from pak armyand cook up a similar Bolloneywood movie.
 
Last edited:
.
'If Iranian general can be droned for terrorism, why not a Pakistani general?'

Chidanand Rajghatta | TNN | Updated: Jan 4, 2020, 22:26 IST

WASHINGTON: Amid widespread misgivings in the US Congress and among American analysts about the assassination of a serving general of a sovereign nation, the Trump administration is belatedly making the case that Iranian General

Qassim Suleimani
was a terrorist and a war criminal who should have been targeted a long time ago, even though he was not on any global proscribed list.


In fact, top administration officials are going so far as to link Iran and Suleimani to 9/11, even though the US Commission that carried out a monumental inquiry into the attack found no such connection. The 9/11 attack was carried out by Sunni extremists, mostly from

Saudi Arabia
, who by most accounts had little or no connection to Shia-majority Iran, a hated regional rival.


US vice-president

Mike Pence
was among those who wheeled out this 9/11 connection in a series of tweets listing Suleimani’s purported terrorist activities, alleging that he “assisted in the clandestine travel to Afghanistan of 10 of the 12 terrorists who carried out the September 11 terrorist attacks in the United States.”


Pence was eviscerated by analysts for “gaslighting” the American public, with experts arguing that the idea that Suleimani would assist in 9/11 — knowingly or otherwise — made no sense, because besides being Shia, he actually cooperated with the US government against the Taliban in Afghanistan, which hosted the 9/11 plotters and perpetrators.

Indeed, the assassination of general Suleimani opened a can of worms for the Trump administration with some Af-Pak experts asking why Washington should not target Pakistani generals who have a more established record of backing and carrying out terrorist attacks.


"Important point: why aren’t the Americans confronting the Taliban masters in Pakistan in a similar manner? The Taliban and their masters in Rawalpindi are responsible for the killing of 3500 US servicemen in Afghanistan," asked Saad Mohseni, a prominent Afghan entrepreneur.


And from a US military veteran on Twitter: So Americans killed by a foreign proxy group are worthy of revenge when it is Iran providing the support, but when it is Pakistan supporting the Taliban and HQN killing Americans in AFG they get a peace deal and Pakistan gets aid.


Several US military commanders and administration officials have accused Pakistan’s military intelligence agency ISI of using Taliban proxies to kill American personnel in Afghanistan with no retribution from successive administrations in Washington except for aid cuts and downgraded ties.

Earlier this week, US secretary of state

Mike Pompeo
revealed in a tweet that he had phoned Pakistan's Chief of Staff General Bajwa and to brief him about "US defensive action to kill Qassim Suleimani," adding that "the #Iran regime’s actions in the region are destabilizing and our resolve in protecting American interests, personnel, facilities, and partners will not waver." It was not clear if Pompeo intended it to be a warning to Bajwa and Pakistan, which in the eyes of some US analysts has long carried out a covert proxy war against US forces in Afghanistan.


Separately, Washington is rife with speculation as to why Trump decided to go in for such precipitate action against Suleimani that is resulting in something the President has pointedly sought to avoid: deploying more US troops abroad. One explanation is that Trump felt he looked weak after his 2019 decision to call off an airstrike against Iran after it downed the US surveillance drone.


There is also conjecture that Trump resented being trolled by Suleimani on social media. The Iranian general was apparently quite adept on Twitter, frequently taunting Trump, including calling him a “bartender” and a “casino manager.”


There are also more serious wag-the-dog explanations for the strike, with one prominent American scribe saying it is "hard to decouple his (Sulemani’s) killing from the impeachment saga." Indeed, the impeachment saga has been blown off the news cycle, at least for now.

https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com...-a-pakistani-general/articleshow/73102067.cms

Trolling time.

I am a Field Marshal.

Everyday I receive scam calls filled with anthrax accent by Fascist Indians.

@GoP

You need to explain your merciful acts of February 2019.

India has earned worlds biggest BITCH title!

Ohh, let me add a bit more to it. The sentence seemed incomplete.

“If Irani General can be shot down, so can indian generals for Terrorism in IOK, Baloch, Pak”


Better question would be, why not Modi and his gang be droned for their long history of hindu terrorism.

Try it muthafcka, we will stick our 12inch muzzle up your mums curryhole.

Never a dull moment with Ganguz...

I hope PMIK's Woodstock Syndrome of hippie love doesn't take us down with it... we showed restraint on 27thFeb and Ganguz go ga ga..

There is Only One Solution...

GoP needs to grow some spine... starting with PMIK... enough credit... I am calling it in now... Show us results or go home....

The reason you bhakts and bhakt enablers in USA dare not drone our generals is simple:

OUR GENERALS ARE BACKED BY NUCLEAR WEAPONS.

It will be a free for all. Every General every other government personnel will be targets... Indian terrorist Hindutva will top that list.

Bring it on.

This Afghan dude must be living in a cave . This is 2020 and India is a SupparPowar. He should ask the Gangus to do something. Of course, we hope SuparPower will show us some mercy and not attack with Gow Cola

Unfortunately our media to this day has failed to construct such a narrative at all, compared to the way rabid Indian media has done against us.

 
. . . .
this attack on top iranian commander should not be taken lightly and it's better for pakistan to protect high profile personalities.under trump,anything can happen.israel asked america to help them and start a war with iran.you can see the results now.india is crying from years and urging america to target high profile people in pakistan.trump is mad.never trust him.i don't trust trump.it's useless to be in american camp.it serves no purpose now.iran is our neighbor.i don't care about sectarian war but attack on top commander is not legal.it's totally illegal.we should better worry about pakistan.indian lobby in america is controlling US congress.
 
.
Exactly, what goes around ...comes around for the Iranian axis of evil.

Wont deny, I had a cheeky smile on hearing the news.

History has proven, whoever harmed Pakistan, has meet a dog's death.

My country, it's people, its interests, rest can go and fk themselves.
 
.
this attack on top iranian commander should not be taken lightly and it's better for pakistan to protect high profile personalities.under trump,anything can happen.israel asked america to help them and start a war with iran.you can see the results now.india is crying from years and urging america to target high profile people in pakistan.trump is mad.never trust him.i don't trust trump.it's useless to be in american camp.it serves no purpose now.iran is our neighbor.i don't care about sectarian war but attack on top commander is not legal.it's totally illegal.we should better worry about pakistan.indian lobby in america is controlling US congress.
Actions and consequences.
India can take action. Will it be able to handle the consequences???
 
.
India need US help to do these type of missions.
But Pakistan can do these missions on his own Capability to India.
As we may kill their Army chief on 27 Feb.
 
.
Good one. Solemani and his gang which was hobnobbing with India against Pakistan with chahbahar non sense , Kulbashan episode and all.

Hope Iranian establishment is reading this story.
Pakistan is still not their friend.
a sunni state and iran will never be friends. They will just suck it up but keep their cordial relationship with bhindia.
 
.
Why giving importance to a toilet newspaper ?

I already said many times that anything originated from TOI should be deleted instantly.
 
  • Like
Reactions: HRK
.
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom