What's new

IF indian force needed to protect Bangladesh-WHY Bangladesh army in UN mission protecting others?

idune

ELITE MEMBER
Joined
Dec 14, 2008
Messages
13,663
Reaction score
-40
Country
Bangladesh
Location
United States
IF indian force needed to protect Bangladesh-WHY Bangladesh army in UN mission protecting other country?

There had been multiple reports on indian overreach to send its forces inside Bangladesh even before Bangladesh asked for anything. That tells the clear and wide indian motivation. Now there are report Awami League regime is allowing such indian occupation force inside Bangladesh. Same way indian occupation forces were invited inside Sikkim and Kashmir before both places lost independence and sovereignty. Overtime, indian occupation on Sikkim and Kashmir turned these places into indian state. Pertaining and immediate question should be raised - IF indian force needed to protect Bangladesh-WHY Bangladesh army in UN mission protecting others?

NSG team to travel to Bangladesh, to study terror strikes

http://www.thehindu.com/news/intern...dy-terror-strikes/article8819095.ece?w=alauto
 
.
Indian forces are there to protect BD? What nonsense!! They are there to analyse and study the behavior and tactic of recent ISIS attacks as It can happen in India too. I remember after 26/11, many foreign teams came to India to analyse things including CIA, Mossad, Scotland Yard etc.
 
.
Indian forces are there to protect BD? What nonsense!! They are there to analyse and study the behavior and tactic of recent ISIS attacks as It can happen in India too. I remember after 26/11, many foreign teams came to India to analyse things including CIA, Mossad, Scotland Yard etc.
How many teams have you sent to Afghanistan,Iraq, Syria, KSA and ofcourse to Paris,Brussels, and Turkey?
 
. .
How many teams have you sent to Afghanistan,Iraq, Syria, KSA and ofcourse to Paris,Brussels, and Turkey?
This is part of the NSG's weekly terror analysis wherein they examine every single terrorist incident that has happened that week and the NSG sends teams where 1) they feel there is an element (or many) worth exploring that they can be better prepared for 2)they feel that they would be better able to secure information themselves (instead of relying on local units) and 3)where there are established agreements with the relevent nations.


As such, after the Kenyan Mall attacks the NSG had sent a team to examine the tactics used by the terrorists. They will not need to send a team to every single incident site, only those that it feels more information can be gleaned by their team and/or there is something of particualr interest to them

Clearly it would be absurd to suggest sending teams to warzones such as Syria, Iraq and Afghanistan* and they can probably trust the French, Belgian and Turkish authorities with the information they woud provide the NSG.

*NSG teams have been to Afghanistan to conduct such analysis when Indian missions have been hit. There is a reason the Indian missions are now amongst the most secure in Afghanistan and despite being hit mulltiple times since 2010 have been safe.
.
 
.
India is more interested in things happening next door t
You sent teams to study and analyze ISIS tactics and Behavior... You should sent team to the placeif even if ISIS attacks greenland
spock-illogical.jpg
 
. .
Clearly it would be absurd to suggest sending teams to warzones such as Syria, Iraq and Afghanistan
Ss One can have plenty of consulates in a country but can not send a team to study and analyze terrorists tactic...because its a warzone and its unsafe?
they can probably trust the French, Belgian and Turkish authorities with the information they woud provide the NSG.
So it means you people do not trust Bangladesh with their investigation and understanding of the attacks?

If ISIS attacks Greenland the NSG will analyse the situation and send evidence response teams if deemed necessary
So to them only a single attackor two in Bangladesh is deemed necessary and hundreds of others not important?
 
. .
You sent teams to study and analyze ISIS tactics and Behavior...

I Think NSG is more concerned about and definitely trying to implicate, A similar sounding organisation with one missing "S"
 
. .
Ss One can have plenty of consulates in a country but can not send a team to study and analyze terrorists tactic...because its a warzone and its unsafe?
As I have said, the NSG has sent teams to Afghanistan when required.

So it means you people do not trust Bangladesh with their investigation and understanding of the attacks?
I did not say that, the call is the NSG's, I cannot comment on why they have felt the need to send a team to BD.

So to them only a single attackor two in Bangladesh is deemed necessary and hundreds of others not important?
I've provided you with the criteria that the NSG use above and it is quite understandable from that context why some incidents require NSG teams to be sent and other do not.
 
. .
IF indian force needed to protect Bangladesh-WHY Bangladesh army in UN mission protecting other country?

There had been multiple reports on indian overreach to send its forces inside Bangladesh even before Bangladesh asked for anything. That tells the clear and wide indian motivation. Now there are report Awami League regime is allowing such indian occupation force inside Bangladesh. Same way indian occupation forces were invited inside Sikkim and Kashmir before both places lost independence and sovereignty. Overtime, indian occupation on Sikkim and Kashmir turned these places into indian state. Pertaining and immediate question should be raised - IF indian force needed to protect Bangladesh-WHY Bangladesh army in UN mission protecting others?


NSG team to travel to Bangladesh, to study terror strikes

http://www.thehindu.com/news/intern...dy-terror-strikes/article8819095.ece?w=alauto
Mate, the team is going to number 4-8 guys, how could they possibly "protect" BD?

You really are losing the plot over this matter
 
. .
Back
Top Bottom