Huge Turkish and HTS casualties in failed attack

[NaCon]

https://twitter.com/x/status/1230909093726085120

https://twitter.com/x/status/1230931897624166400

 

[Pakistani Fighter]

OMG What is happening

 

[NaCon]

https://twitter.com/x/status/1230925214034354176

https://twitter.com/x/status/1230941728129110018

 

[IblinI]

Turkiye never will allow Russia and Iran in Idlib

 

[Cthulhu]

OMG What is happening

The Russians then in return attacked those vehicles that participated in this attack.

 

[PakAlp]

Erdogan backed salafi terrorists sent directly to hell.

Why would Erdogan back terrorists who will most likely make Turkey a target after Syria. Seems like a faulty policy.

 

[NaCon]

OVER 200 MILITANTS ELIMINATED DURING FAILED TURKISH-LED ATTACK ON AL-NAYRAB: SYRIAN TV



Illustrative image

The Syrian Arab Army (SAA) eliminated more than 250 militants while repelling the Turkish-led attack on the town of al-Nayrab in Greater Idlib, the Syrian TV revealed.

According to the state-run channel, the army also destroyed many battle tanks, armored vehicles, howitzers and rocket launchers which were supplied by Turkey.

Al-Qaeda-affiliated Hay’at Tahrir al-Sham (HTS) and the National Front for Liberation (NFL) carried out the attack in the morning of February 20. The Turkish military provided the militants with direct fire support.

The Turkish military had acknowledged that two of its service members were killed in a town near al-Nayrab during the attack.

The support of the Russian Aerospace Forces (VKS) allowed the SAA to repel the large-scale attack within a few hours. Su-24 warplanes destroyed twelve vehicles of the attackers, despite being targeted from the ground.

The failure of the attack was for sure a major blow to the militants and Turkey. Ankara, however, may soon launch yet another attack in order to improve its position in any future negotiations with Moscow.

 

[Pan-Islamic-Pakistan]

I am afraid that's not Iranian lingo, but your sectarian mindset lingo.

Actually I am generally pro-Shia, and Iranian actions are not beyond judgement.

The vast majority of Muslims find Iranian actions of using Shia militias reprehensible.

 

[Philosopher]

The vast majority of Muslims find Iranian actions of using Shia militias reprehensible.

What exactly is reprehensible? Be specific please.

 

[Yankee-stani]

Actually I am generally pro-Shia, and Iranian actions are not beyond judgement.

The vast majority of Muslims find Iranian actions of using Shia militias reprehensible.

If you are going condemn Iranian meddling in Syria you should also condemn Turkish meddling as that's been more costly to the Syrian nation and caused Turkish reputation as regional power to falter

 

[HannibalBarca]

If you are going condemn Iranian meddling in Syria you should also condemn Turkish meddling as that's been more costly to the Syrian nation and caused Turkish reputation as regional power to falter

Keep your crocodile tears to yourself...
You do not care about Turkey... That's your Soft sugar to make yourself part of the discussion without getting yourself busted by the group...
and if you want to play... you can ask.. here a little game for you... Who came first in Syria? Iran or Turkey? try... it's not hard... go ahead...
More? Who pushed 10Mil refugees out of their country and Home? those 600k death from who? Right now 1 Mil running from ASSad in Idlib? fake also?


Have fun...

Yes, I was forced by you to change it. You were too compelling.

Seems the Eagle striked again...
Still remember your "I have nothing to do with Iran..."
Get Busted with a Smile...

 

[Pan-Islamic-Pakistan]

According to Iranians, we just imagined the humanitarian catastrophe in Syria.

 

[Philosopher]

Seems the Eagle striked again...

Do me and others here a favour and don't waste precious thread space with such meaningless remarks. If you're going to quote me, at least 1) Make sense.

According to Iranians, we just imagined the humanitarian catastrophe in Syria.

No, you're not imagining it, what you are imagining however, is that Iran was behind it/driving it.

 

[masterchief_mirza]

What exactly is reprehensible? Be specific please.

Hiring Pakistani citizens as Iranian militias is reprehensible. Do you not realise that these folks cannot return to Pakistan once brainwashed by your lot into waging war for sectarian purposes? Do you not see the conflict of interest that will exist for those trained as sectarian militiamen when they try to return to a nation where sectarianism is not acceptable?

Pakistani shias deserve better. In fact, Iranian shias deserve better.

 

[masterchief_mirza]

@AgNoStiC MuSliM How many times is he allowed to post sectarian flame bate comments? please ban this monster before he starts another sectarian war on PDF.

I think he's criticised the current Iranian regime with his comments....and I echo that criticism.