What's new

Huawei Spies For China, Former NSA Director Says

kalu_miah

SENIOR MEMBER
Joined
Jan 4, 2009
Messages
6,475
Reaction score
17
Country
Bangladesh
Location
United States
Huawei Spies For China, Former NSA Director Says - Security -

Huawei Spies For China, Former NSA Director Says
Mathew J. Schwartz

Michael Hayden, a former NSA and CIA chief, accuses Chinese telecom equipment maker Huawei of engaging in espionage on behalf of the Chinese state.

Chinese telecom equipment maker Huawei actively spies for the Chinese government.
That accusation was leveled by Michael Hayden, who lead the CIA from 2006 to 2009, in an interview published Friday by Australia's Financial Review.

"At a minimum, Huawei would have shared with the Chinese state intimate and extensive knowledge of the foreign telecommunications systems it is involved with," said Hayden, a retired four-star Air Force general who also served as director of the National Security Agency (NSA) from 1999 to 2005. He's now a visiting professor at George Mason University's School of Public Policy, a principal at security consultancy Chertoff Group, and a director of Motorola Solutions.

[ Is Snowden a hero? Read NSA Prism Whistleblower Snowden Deserves A Medal. ]

Hayden refused to comment on specific "instances of espionage or any operational matters," for example, pertaining to whether the U.S. government had discovered Huawei actively eavesdropping on equipment or networks it had installed. But in his professional opinion, Huawei is engaged in espionage on behalf of the Chinese state. "Frankly, given the overarching national security risks a foreign company helping build your national telecommunications networks creates, the burden of proof is not on us. It is on Huawei," he said. "In fact, I don't think Huawei has ever really tried hard to meet this burden of proof test."

One of the top concerns related to China's largest telecommunications equipment manufacturer spying on behalf of the Chinese state is that the country's intelligence services don't limit themselves to targeting "state secrets" or political espionage. "They have a much broader definition of legitimate espionage to include intellectual property, commercial trade secrets and the negotiating positions of private entities," Hayden said. "In other words, they don't limit themselves in the way we do in the English-speaking community."

Accordingly, the former NSA director saluted the House of Representatives Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence report on Huawei and ZTE, released in October 2012, which found that "these guys are not even transparent to themselves," he said. "There's no transparency around who appoints the board of directors or controls the ownership of the business. And there's no independent Chinese government oversight committee that could give us continuing confidence that Huawei or ZTE would not do what they promised not to do."

The House report lead to a ban on U.S. government agencies buying equipment from Huawei or ZTE without prior approval from the FBI. The report's findings also influenced U.S. businesses. According to a study conducted by InformationWeek earlier this year, 37% of surveyed businesses said the findings were major cause for concern, while 34% said the results represented a deal-breaker.

But what of U.S. espionage? Asked about the need for Prism and other NSA surveillance programs, and how they differed from Chinese espionage operations, the former NSA director first offered unabashed support for the former. "I fully admit: we steal other country's secrets. And frankly we're quite good at it," he said. "But the reason we steal these secrets is to keep our citizens free, and to keep them safe. We don't steal secrets to make our citizens rich. Yet this is exactly what the Chinese do."

The details on those NSA programs were leaked, of course, by former NSA contractor Edward Snowden, who fled Hawaii for Hong Kong in May 2013, before flying to Moscow, where he requested temporary asylum earlier this week.

But how did Snowden, an infrastructure analyst, have access to such a wealth of information pertaining to so many different NSA monitoring programs?

The answer arrived Thursday: Thanks to Microsoft SharePoint. "This leaker was a system administrator who was trusted with moving information to actually make sure the right information was on the SharePoint servers that NSA Hawaii needed," said NSA director Keith Alexander Thursday in a media briefing at the Aspen Security Forum in Colorado. Obviously, even spies need to store their secrets somewhere.


Security is a big issue, especially for small and midsize businesses, and it often makes sense for resource-constrained SMBs to look outside their own IT ranks for support. In the Security Outsourcing For The Small Business report, we examine the types of outsourced services available and provide advice to SMBs about evaluating their own needs and readiness to establish partnerships with third-party security providers. (Free registration required.)
 
.
NSA lies, deceives and spies for U.S. government ex NSA whistleblower said.
No respect for allies, partner, lackeys and anyone.
 
.
Apple spies for US, Samsung spies for Korea, Nokia spies for Finland/India, Sony spies for Japan.........
 
.
.
But what of U.S. espionage? Asked about the need for Prism and other NSA surveillance programs, and how they differed from Chinese espionage operations, the former NSA director first offered unabashed support for the former. "I fully admit: we steal other country's secrets. And frankly we're quite good at it," he said. "But the reason we steal these secrets is to keep our citizens free, and to keep them safe. We don't steal secrets to make our citizens rich. Yet this is exactly what the Chinese do."

Source: http://www.defence.pk/forums/china-...a-former-nsa-director-says.html#ixzz2ZWI1z0fA

Isn't it true that MS, GOOG, other high tech companies leave bugs in their programs in exchange for business secrets from NSA?
 
.
the yanks no like it because huawei doesn't give them backdoor access to the nsa like cisco and others. only them allowed to spy. :lol:


-
How Cisco Gathers Intelligence on You to Share With the NSA
*ttp://www.occupycorporatism.com/how-cisco-gathers-intelligence-on-you-to-share-with-the-nsa/

Intel’s chips allow for remote access: Prism has access to anything with an intel chip (and other stuff)
*ww.maxkeiser.com/2013/06/intels-chips-allow-for-remote-access-prism-has-access-to-anything-with-an-intel-chip-and-other-stuff/

prism.png
 
. .
U.S. has the most technology companies in the world and has the best chance to spy other countries.
 
. .
Most corporations in the IT industry spy. ASUS spies for India, Kaspersky for Russia, America is notorious with its multinationals.

However it does not really affect the average consumer.
 
.
After snowden incident. US still dare to bring up this issue? Are US going to say US Cisco is an angel and never spy on others countries?
Everybody knows their respective company spy for their own government. But you will be a extra bastard if you start accuse others of spying as if US companies are innocent.

No other countries do that except the ultra hypocrite USA. China shall threaten to ban Cisco if US continue do this kind of hypocrite nonsense.
 
.
Most corporations in the IT industry spy. ASUS spies for India, Kaspersky for Russia, America is notorious with its multinationals.

However it does not really affect the average consumer.

Last time I checked, ASUS is not an Indian company.
 
.
haa haaa...cant believe
:omghaha:

NSA National Security Agency only work for American Security issues...not like CIA working around the world..
than there is no need of NSA to explore the garbage of other countries..
 
. .
Huawei tells ex-CIA chief to 'put up or shut up' over claims

2013-07-20 01:52:33 G
MT2013-07-20 09:52:33 (Beijing Time)
Global Times

Huawei_-_logo_and_headquarters.jpg

credit: wireless-mag


Huawei tells ex-CIA chief to 'put up or shut up' over claims - Business News - SINA English

Huawei Technologies, a leading telecom equipment supplier, Friday slammed a former CIA chief's accusations against the company as "defamatory."

Former CIA chief Michael Hayden said in an interview with Australian paper Financial Review that Huawei had "shared with the Chinese state intimate and extensive knowledge of the foreign telecommunications systems it is involved with."

In a statement sent to the Global Times Friday, Huawei said, "These tired, unsubstantiated defamatory remarks are sad distractions from real-world concerns related to espionage - industrial and otherwise - that demand serious discussion globally."
William Plummer, Huawei's vice president of external affairs, said in a statement to The Verge that "Someone says they got some proof of some sort of threat? Okay, then put up. Or shut up."

Plummer also said that the accusation is "politically inspired and racist corporate defamation" because of Huawei's China heritage.
A US congressional investigation last October concluded that Chinese telecom companies Huawei and ZTE Corporation pose a security threat to the US.

Besides the US investigation, the UK has also ordered a review of Huawei's Cyber Security Evaluation Center in Banbury, after a parliament report expressed concerns over the company's alleged relations with the Chinese government.

Despite the probe, the UK government Thursday said, "Our work with Huawei and their UK customers gives us confidence that the networks in the UK that use Huawei equipment are operated to a high standard of security and integrity," according to its website.

Huawei responded Friday in a statement sent to the Global Times that the company supports the decision by the UK government to review the center, which is used to test its products for potential vulnerabilities. "Huawei is open to new ideas and ways of working to improve cyber security," the company said.

"Huawei has been investing in the UK for 12 years, so the company for sure still wants to keep good cooperation with the UK government," Xiang Ligang, chief executive of telecom industry portal cctime.com, told the Global Times Friday.

"It can provide products of higher quality and lower cost compared with its competitors," Xiang said.
 
.
Back
Top Bottom