How To Attack Pakistan

[PeacefulIndian]

Useless article - even more useless responses...
may be mine is one of them as well

 

[SurvivoR]

Useless article - even more useless responses...
may be mine is one of them as well

its good to have fun sometimes.

 

[dabong1]

Precisely the kind of sick mentality I have seen so many times on this forum, when it comes to nukes. Why do you forget there will be no Pakistan when India responds?. Nearly 100 million will be dead instantly,over a billion will succumb to radiation and the entire subcontinent will be rendered unhospitable. Dont give me maths, that more wil be on this side or that side. No amount to "logic" justifies the killing of 300 million on any side.

You will not win the war, you would have destroyed a part of the earth. You would have nothing to rejoice when the subcontinent goes back to stone age.
If that is what appeals to your pea sized nuke-loving brain, then you should re-define "victory" for yourself since no amount to education will make you a "literate" ever.

Lets change to the question to "what if china attacked india and india was about to get defeated......would you use nukes against china?

 

[godsavetheworld]

Lets change to the question to "what if china attacked india and india was about to get defeated......would you use nukes against china?

Nukes are out of the question. Both India and China have a no first use policy. And neither are a trigger happy nation, unlike Pakistan. A future Indo-China conflict wouldn't last more than 2 days at max. UN would begin sweating in its pants, go overboard for a cease fire.

It would be foolish for India or China to send in cavalry across the Himalayas. Then why monger about a Indo-China war?

 

[khaled_m_ali]

Nukes are out of the question. Both India and China have a no first use policy. And neither are a trigger happy nation, unlike Pakistan. A future Indo-China conflict wouldn't last more than 2 days at max. UN would begin sweating in its pants, go overboard for a cease fire.

It would be foolish for India or China to send in cavalry across the Himalayas. Then why monger about a Indo-China war?

Chinese subs blow IN to hell; then the rest of the Chinese fleet can move in.

 

[Kharian_Beast]

Nukes are out of the question. Both India and China have a no first use policy. And neither are a trigger happy nation, unlike Pakistan. A future Indo-China conflict wouldn't last more than 2 days at max. UN would begin sweating in its pants, go overboard for a cease fire.

It would be foolish for India or China to send in cavalry across the Himalayas. Then why monger about a Indo-China war?

Trigger happy ? When was the last time Pakistan fired a nuke ? Oh yea, after India had sanctions placed on them for going haywire with nuke tests.

A conflict between India and China would be disastrous for India, as no doubt Pakistan would be involved from the western front which India would require at least 75% of its available manpower and military resources to counter, giving China nothing more than a mop up operation at best. Have no doubt, if India is the aggressor in a large scale future conflict between either country, no one would be able to help India and within days the Indian military machine would become crippled for life.

 

[Hasnain2009]

THe best way to attack and destroy any country is to destroy them from the inside. Organised warfare between India and Pakistan since 1947, have lasted less than a month all the time, with the net result that , both nations survived, had setbacks and came out stronger.
However, 'dhimaks' will destroy the foundations of a nation more efficently.

Thats india is diong in pakistan!! Funding the liberation armys and the talibans!!

 

[dabong1]

Nukes are out of the question. Both India and China have a no first use policy. And neither are a trigger happy nation, unlike Pakistan. A future Indo-China conflict wouldn't last more than 2 days at max. UN would begin sweating in its pants, go overboard for a cease fire.

It would be foolish for India or China to send in cavalry across the Himalayas. Then why monger about a Indo-China war?

I must admit i love they way you avoid the question.....If india was about to be defeated by china even after the UN was involved.......would you still stick by your "no first use policy"?

Its a simple question and a basic yes or no will do!

 

[Proud2Indian]

I must admit i love they way you avoid the question.....If india was about to be defeated by china even after the UN was involved.......would you still stick by your "no first use policy"?

Its a simple question and a basic yes or no will do!

Short ans - No.
Long ans- What do you mean defeated? How you quantify that? You mean surrendering of arms by IA? CA reaching New Delhi? When to use Nukes during conflict is something no nation will be able to answer.

tx

 

[Proud2Indian]

Thats india is diong in pakistan!! Funding the liberation armys and the talibans!!

I will not refute your claim..but will not you accept that Pakistan is also involved in the same. How all this started can be discussed some other time, some other thrd...but end of day...both are doing it.

tx