How Israel backed media attacks you when you challenge ISRAEL in UN

[denel]

Well done SMQ.

https://www.facebook.com/video.php?v=1188865921575344

Also where is the rest of the Ummah Chuma ???


Has any other Arab leader faced similar questions???

Well, they dont have an IQ to answer; so they wont reply.

You need to know how to argue with Zionists:

1. Illegal settlement is ILLEGAL.
2. Forced eviction is ILLEGAL
3. Water rights and draconian policies which limit water usage but allow x20 for a settler is ILLEGAL
4. Pass book concept which we had here is ILLEGAL.
5. Punishment of entire family including demolition of homes for those who are related is ILLEGAL

the list goes on.

Put the case back - WHY ARE THE EUROPEANS/US/CANADA TRYING TO OFFLOAD THEIR GUILT.

Did anyone stop for one second and tell them to focus on what caused the spark? No, Zionists are master spinners and whataboutism to turn themselves into victims. Focus on the core issue = do not deviate from the core issues; otherwise you fall into their trap.

 

[Nasr]

Pakistan FM invokes antisemitic slur
Discussing Israel's actions in Gaza, Pakistan's Foreign Minister Shah Mahmood Qureshi said Israel has "deep pockets" and "they control media," prompting strong pushback from CNN's Bianna Golodryga.

https://edition.cnn.com/videos/tv/2021/05/20/amanpour-pakistan-shah-mahmood-qureshi-israel.cnn


@Horus @waz @Jungibaaz @HRK @500 @koolio @Indus Pakistan @Dariush the Great @Zibago @Dual Wielder @Del @Path-Finder @Patriot forever

Fyi Bianna Golodryga is an Ashkenazi!

 

[313ghazi]

This is the story of Pakistan, a series of never ending own goals.

Pakistanis don’t seem to think there’s a world outside their borders except India. So the Pakistani foreign minister can come on a major American cable channel and make these sorts of ridiculous statements. And it’s not like he was even set up to make that statement. He set it up himself, giggling and smiling like a little girl as he made some pretty reprehensible statements.

I am not surprised that the Pakistani embassy didn’t even bother to prepare him for the interview. Pakistani officials act like they own the world and don’t see the point of preparations and working out an effective communication strategy. It’s the reason why Pakistan’s image is in such a horrible place.Your FM simply confirmed what people believed about your country, that it is a bigoted and backward country.

Countries spend millions each year on their communication strategy and image, Pakistanis think they can just walk in and wow the universe. They almost always end up embarrassing themselves.

There is NO way to defend the statements made by your FM. If your argument is that we don’t need the world or care what it thinks of us, that’s fine. But then don’t come on American channels and make these kinds of insane claims. His ignorance and expressed bigotry undermined the legitimate work done by pro-Palestinian groups.

What a ridiculous position to hold. There is insurmountable evidence of Israeli influence in Western politics and western media. I could list a dozen public cases in Britain alone off the top of my head.

 

[ummarz]

Yes, unfortunately I agree. This is tragedy of Pakistan. All he did was dumped on the image of Pakistan even more as if it was not bad enough. CNN and other such media make global opinion. And if what SMQ did actually was of benefit to the Palis at least he could say I did some good. But it served no purpose. It only gave others opportunityt to bash Pakistan more.

On the other hand the Egytptian's have actually done something. Beause they recognize Israel they engaged with Tel Aviv and Hamas. By having open access to both parties Egypt managed to arrange a ceasefire - thus coming out as relevant.

While Pakistan came out as the as*s.

I beg to differ

I believe he did pretty well on LIVE TV after being blamed for making anti Semitic remarks. I also do believe our speakers and ministers should be trained to deal with these situations in a better way in the future.

In my opinion, although there was no need to mention the "connections", but once said, he should have called her out right away and gone on the offensive once she said that. A simple "excuse me!, how is this anti Semitic?" would have put her on the spot. We can not let criticism of Israel to become anti Semitic.

Anyhow, here is why I believe he did a pretty good job.

1: Called for the two state solution, aligns with the US policy
2: He said he doesn't condone the rocket attacks, just as he doesn't condone the Israeli bombings
3: All loss of life, be it Israeli or Palestinian is bad in his view
4: Wants hostilities to stop and talks to start and solve the issue
5: He mentioned that the world perception is changing, and Israel is losing the media war (important)

Why is this good
A peaceful means to a two state solution dismantles Israeli propaganda, which has always been that they are being surrounded and they are alone vs the Middle East. And all the neighbours want to "push them into the sea".

Optics
In all my life this is the first time I am seeing prominent western journalists take a pro Palestinian stance. Never has it been this pro Palestinian. This is very positive, because finally we are seeing peoples conscious wake up, and see the conflict for what it is. In particular I really enjoyed Last Week Tonight with John Oliver.
SMQ also called out the change in public perception, I loved it.

Social media is rising, independent reporting from VICE and others is really beginning to take centre stage. And I am certain the time isn't far when CNN and the likes are gone down the drain.

Another interesting thing that nobody is talking about is, how bold Pak has become. I am impressed. We have our ministers and big brains sent out to the world, to the US to play a key role in geopolitics of regions far from us. It is understandable that we would have a bigger role to play though, since we cleaned up our backyard.

All in all, these are positive developments.

Oh and these anti Semitic blames are never gonna stick. There is nothing substantial there to go on. Nothing we or SMQ need to worry about.

 

[Goenitz]

For you people, history only starts 7 th century AD ..after the advent of Islam. What ever happened before that ..is conveniently forgotten.

Your logic is totally applicable for native Indians as they were not only killed but stayed in their native lands. Whereas Israelite left the Middle east and spread in EU. Some remained there and lived peacefully during Ottoman reign.

 

[Varunastra]

Wonder what she would say if she knew SMQ speaks an indo ARYAN language

 

[ummarz]

Wonder what she would say if she knew SMQ speaks an indo ARYAN language

A Semite will still be a Semite, even if he only spoke English.

Semitic - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

But getting to the crux of the issue. These days, being anti Semitic usually means, against Jews. He blamed Israel, not Jews. Period end of this.

 

[Goenitz]

It is like saying that if we criticize India, we are being hindu phobic or if we criticize Pakistan then somehow we are being islamophobic.

Or blaming Russia for rigging US election.. anti orthodox, or blaming SA for funding Trump/ Trump daughter, in election... Islamophobic..

 

[El Sidd]

I beg to differ

I believe he did pretty well on LIVE TV after being blamed for making anti Semitic remarks. I also do believe our speakers and ministers should be trained to deal with these situations in a better way in the future.

In my opinion, he should have called her out right away and gone on the offensive once she said that. A simple "excuse me!, how is this anti Semitic?" would have put her on the spot.

Anyhow, here is why I believe he did a pretty good job.

1: Called for the two state solution, aligns with the US policy
2: He said he doesn't condone the rocket attacks, just as he doesn't condone the Israeli bombings
3: All loss of life, be it Israeli or Palestinian is bad in his view
4: Wants hostilities to stop and talks to start and solve the issue
5: He mentioned that the world perception is changing, and Israel is losing the media war (important)

Why is this good
A peaceful means to a two state solution dismantles Israeli propaganda, which has always been that they are being surrounded and they are alone vs the Middle East. And all the neighbours want to "push them into the sea".

Optics
In all my life this is the first time I am seeing prominent western journalists take a pro Palestinian stance. Never has it been this pro Palestinian. This is very positive, because finally we are seeing peoples conscious wake up, and see the conflict for what it is. In particular I really enjoyed Last Week Tonight with John Oliver.
SMQ also called out the change in public perception, I loved it.

Social media is rising, independent reporting from VICE and others is really beginning to take centre stage. And I am certain the time isn't far when CNN and the likes are gone down the drain.

Another interesting thing that nobody is talking about is, how bold Pak has become. I am impressed. We have our ministers and big brains sent out to the world, to the US to play a key role in geopolitics of regions far from us. It is understandable that we would have a bigger role to play though, since we cleaned up our backyard.

All in all, these are positive developments.

Oh and these anti Semitic blames are never gonna stick. There is nothing substantial there to go on. Nothing we or SMQ need to worry about.

Is 2 state solution Pakistan's state policy or this government's policy?

I don't think Pakistan has officially adopted 2 state solution as fundamental policy of the state.

The founding fathers died convinced that the land belonged to Arabs.

Pakistan and Israel seem to be in a competition as to who will ditch America first.

 

[Mohsin A]

 

[El Sidd]

Fyi Bianna Golodryga is an Ashkenazi!

She can be anyone she wants. She is just doing her job like Qureshi.

GoP can file a case against CNN for sabotaging Pakistan's efforts for lasting solution to the conflict. Lets see how deep those pockets really are.

I don't know why there needs be a fixation on this.

 

[krash]

The FM should have done his homework before showing up for the interview. That claim is largely considered anti-Semitic, accurate or not. Made himself look like an even bigger fool after backtracking to "it's the perception"; he openly admitted that he was peddling hearsay. That hack of a journalist used age old "tropes" to trap him and he had no answers. This is the man we sent to champion Pakistan for Palestine?

This is not Pakistani domestic politics, you can't make up for your idiocy and incompetence by acting like a peacock. We had no one better than this blithering idiot?

 

[Indus Pakistan]

In my opinion, he should have called her out right away and gone on the offensive once she said that. A simple "excuse me!, how is this anti Semitic?" would have put her on the spot.

Personally I would have him not even be mouthing off about Palis on Western media and instead leave that to Mohammed Bin Salman, Sheikhs of UAE, Sisi of Egypt or Erdogan.

But if he had to then he should have executed that Jewish b*tach from dump called Moldava. He should have done his homework and know from her name is a a East European Jew - the very breed who make most of the Zionists in Israel.

 

[cloud4000]

Let me correct your Indian little brain .... it the Zionist not the Jews. Plus, you need to read history and Torah, Bible, and Quran to understand this issue.

You need to define what Zionism is because it seems to mean different things to different people.

I can read all the history and all the religious text, it doesn't explain the situation the Ummah is in.

 

[Indus Pakistan]

Zionism

At it's heart and basiic -

• the right of Jews or those claiming to Jews have right to the land of Palestine on the grounds that god gave it to them.