What's new

'How can IMF negotiate with IMF?' Bilawal criticises Reza Baqir's appointment as SBP governo

ni8mare

SENIOR MEMBER
Joined
Apr 19, 2013
Messages
2,607
Reaction score
-5
Country
India
Location
India
'How can IMF negotiate with IMF?' Bilawal criticises Reza Baqir's appointment as SBP governor
Dawn.comUpdated May 08, 2019

5cd2c965bdb48.png

PPP Chairperson Bilawal Bhutto-Zardari speaks to journalists outside the parliament on Wednesday. — DawnNewsTV

PPP Chairperson Bilawal Bhutto-Zardari on Wednesday criticised the government over the recent appointments of economic adviser, State Bank of Pakistan's (SBP) governor and Federal Board of Revenue's chairperson, questioning if the decisions were made on the dictation of the International Monetary Fund (IMF).

Speaking to reporters outside the National Assembly, Bilawal said that the government had offered no explanation for the sudden changes. The PPP chairperson said that Prime Minister Imran Khan had appointed Hafeez Shaikh — who was finance minister from 2010-13 when PPP was in government — as the economic adviser "without even meeting him" and claimed that no one, including the premier, knew the reasons behind the change.

He specifically raised questions over the appointment of Dr Reza Baqir— an IMF economist — as SBP governor and asked: "How can IMF negotiate with IMF?"

"All of a sudden [after Shaikh's appointment], SBP and FBR heads are shown the door. The person appointed as SBP governor was previously receiving his salary from the IMF [...] no matter how good or bad [Baqir] is, there will be suspicion as to whether IMF is taking these decisions."

Also read: IMF employee's appointment as SBP governor akin to 'colonisation of Pakistan', says Rabbani

Bilawal admitted that PPP too had sought a deal from the IMF but insisted that his party had "never compromised on Pakistan's financial rights". He said that the PPP had started a "revolutionary programme" — the Benazir Income Support Programme — that created jobs, and raised salaries and pensions of government employees.

He criticised the government for "usurping the rights of labour unions" and warned that if the government fails to improve the economic situation of the country, opposition will be forced to protest inside and outside the parliament. He added that political instability in the country had led to economic instability.

PML-N decision 'not final'
In response to a question regarding PML-N's decision to change the Public Accounts Committee (PAC) chairperson, Bilawal said that the PPP had not been taken into confidence.

"They [PML-N] might not have had a chance," he said. "But yesterday one of their members said in the assembly that the decision was not final."

In a shocking move, the PML-N had last week announced that Shahbaz Sharif, who is Leader of the Opposition in the National Assembly, had stepped down as PAC chairperson and the party had nominated Rana Tanvir in his stead. Though the PML-N insisted that PPP had been taken into confidence, the latter said that the decision was "one-sided".

"We are surprised at the decision," PPP's Shazia Marri had said. "Bilawal Bhutto-Zardari was present in the parliament. He was not informed and neither were the PAC members."

The announcement had attracted criticism from the Pakistan Tehreek-i-Insaf as well, that recalled that Sharif had been appointed as PAC chairperson after a five-month deadlock as the ruling party was reluctant to give chairmanship of this vital parliamentary committee to the opposition leader contrary to the traditional practice. The PML-N had refused to nominate another member from the party to head the PAC, arguing that according to parliamentary tradition, the leader of the opposition should become chairman of this committee.

In his conversation with reporters today, Bilawal said that it had been decided in the Charter of Democracy that the opposition leader would be PAC chairperson so that the accountability process would be transparent and insisted that the practice should be upheld.
 
. .
Remember Imran Khan used to say he will commit suicide before going to IMF.

Quite a jump from considering IMF bad to surrendering the whole Pakistan to IMF.

The biggest Uturn he has taken and for that he probably thinks he's a great leader :rofl:
 
.
The guy is just doing politics for the sake of politics, I believe these kinds of politicians draw pleasure out of economic setbacks under the government of their political adversaries, the reason could be that they think that if the ruling party becomes successful in improving the economic situation of pakistan then their political fortunes will take a back seat in the next elections. Pakistan may be the only country in the world where politics is done on economic matters without realizing that economy affects the life of every citizen of the country irrespective of political affiliation of that citizen at any given time.
 
.
Remember Imran Khan used to say he will commit suicide before going to IMF.

Quite a jump from considering IMF bad to surrendering the whole Pakistan to IMF.

The biggest Uturn he has taken and for that he probably thinks he's a great leader :rofl:

Actually, it does not matter as long as PMIK stabilizes the economy. Results matter above all.
 
.
As long as both IMF teams seal the deal and Pakistani economy recovers, criticism does not matter. OTOH if economy enters stagflation, IK better have a third plan ready.
 
. . . . . .
9 months results are before us, the legendary handsome Khan gets f grade (f for failure).

He like his predecessor will fail to stabilize the economy. ---
Ok...u have given him an f. Since 1947 u have stayed quiet and allowed thieves to plunder but ...

What would u do differently
 
Last edited:
.
Ok...u have given him and f. Since 1947 u have stayed quiet and allowed thieves to plunder but ...

What would u do differently
I didn't stayed quiet, I did what I could in my personal capacity --- the question must be directed towards powerful circles of this country, why they remained quiet and allowed thieves to plunder?

I will wait for the time, the right time ......

Lol only a patwaari with with zilch knowledge of basic economics would make this type of comment. You are the type of people who rejoice when government burn the foreign reserves to give you subsidies in everything not realising its unsustainable and going to bite us back in our *** in the long run.
I can assure you (100% guaranteed) that I know more about contemporary + Islamic economics than your PM Imran Khan.
 
. .
The question is how long does IK need to turn it around? This is a reasonable question....because every new PM has different challenges and he has to overcome these obstacles otherwise he will be a flash in the pan
 
.

Latest posts

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Country Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom