What's new

How Britain Stole $45 Trillion from Pakistan, Bangladesh & India with Trains

. .
People need to live in the present time, with the past to remind them to stay on their goal.
 
. .
Fake news from India. Just like scammer Google CEO Sundar Pichai
 
. .
Hasn't this claim been completely debunked?
so? this here is PDF. where you can be whatever you cannot in the real world. realm of fantasy and ego massaging.

you can't expect him to post that less than 3.5k traders "beat" 50k professional soldiers and took over Bengal, do you?

how do 3.5k beat 50k? unless them 50k were sick and tired of their lot in life and did something to change their miserable lives?
 
Last edited:
. . .
Koh-i-Nur itself is worth $0.5 billion! It’s just a little piece of the treasure stolen by Brits!!
 
. .
A figure plucked out from air with no explanation whatsoever.

Does India even have $45 trillion worth of wealth at that time?

45 Trillion might be exaggerated but once India was one of the richest place on earth contributed large portion of world GDP . Britain rip it off
 
. .
Koh-i-Nur itself is worth $0.5 billion! It’s just a little piece of the treasure stolen by Brits!!
stolen? or taken from "mahraja" kana singh ranjeet's successors after liberating areas under their tyranny? who fought kana singh successor, all whites or sub-continentals who had previously been freed from the yoke of various ranjeet kana like warlords?

anyways it might originally have belonged to iranis, stolen/acquired by afghan Durrani. then "stolen" won in battle by pedo babar and passed down until their destruction and then was taken by sikhs (along with masaajid which they used as stables for sikh worshipers of newly built gurdwaras next doors)
 
.
45 Trillion might be exaggerated but once India was one of the richest place on earth contributed large portion of world GDP . Britain rip it off

Do you have any scientific evidences for that claim, because I have seen similar claims from SS Africa.

China did census and statistics with scientific methods countrywide for various subjects (population, quantity of rices produced every year, quantity of gold stocked in government storage, etc.) since perhaps before Qin Shi huangdi (200 BC), and they recorded statistics data very well in their books, which are still available today, so scientists can estimate relatively correct GDP data for 2000 years or 500 years ago.

Aside from China, no country did that, including Europe, until around 17 - 18 century.

India might be rich in the past in the sense that it had a lot of gold, but certainly no one can confirm and compare. European conquerors saying that "oh India was so rich" does not automatically mean India was actually rich. The same that European colonizers claiming Saigon was "The Pearl of the Far East", which delusional Southern Vietnamese still echoing today, but it was actually a city full of slums, dirty and relatively poor compared to even Khabarovsk (Russian Far East) or Nanning (a Chinese backward city in Quangxi province), Kuala Lumpur or Bangkok, let alone Tokyo, Shanghai or Singapore at that time.
 
.
Back
Top Bottom