What's new

Hong Kong aims to earmark 300 hectares of land in proposed technopole near mainland China border for innovation and technology uses

Nan Yang

SENIOR MEMBER
Joined
May 1, 2010
Messages
5,269
Reaction score
1
Country
Malaysia
Location
Malaysia

Hong Kong aims to earmark 300 hectares of land in proposed technopole near mainland China border for innovation and technology uses

  • Development Bureau says government will consider providing direct land grants in 627-hectare San Tin Technopole, a major project in the planned Northern Metropolis
  • Site will also provide between 50,000 and 54,000 homes, 70 per cent of which will be public flats, and accommodate up to 159,000 people

Fiona Sun
Fiona Sunand Edith Lin
Published: 9:35pm, 18 May, 2023
1684516961938.png


Hong Kong authorities want to earmark half of a planned 627-hectare “technopole” near the border with mainland China for innovation and technology purposes – an area equivalent to Shenzhen’s tech hub or 17 science parks – while creating more than 50,000 homes.

The Development Bureau on Thursday said the government would consider adopting land grant methods other than open tendering in the San Tin Technopole, a major development project in the planned Northern Metropolis, including providing sites directly to organisations.

The technopole, first proposed by former city leader Carrie Lam Cheng Yuet-ngor in 2021 and projected to become a Hong Kong version of Silicon Valley, will provide 300 hectares of land for uses related to innovation and technology (I&T). It includes 87 hectares in the Lok Ma Chau Loop for the Hong Kong-Shenzhen Innovation and Technology Park.

That area is equivalent to 17 Hong Kong Science Parks or the 300-hectare Shenzhen Innovation and Technology Zone across the border.
“The San Tin Technopole covers a large area and is located in the heart of the Northern Metropolis,” a bureau spokesman said on Thursday. “It is the top priority of the Northern Metropolis.”

1684517023510.png


The spokesman said direct land grants were a new model in the I&T sector. The government had explored diverse land grant methods, aiming to attract leading businesses in the industry to the new tech hub, he added.

“A direct land grant has its advantages, but we also have things to watch out for as land resources are precious in Hong Kong,” he said.

“We will see what substantial benefits the businesses that we want to attract will bring to Hong Kong, including the number of jobs created and the contribution to local gross domestic product,” the spokesman said, adding the authorities would only resort to this method in justified circumstances.

According to authorities, the new tech hub will create at least 165,000 jobs, including 120,000 or more related to I&T uses.

The site will also provide between 50,000 and 54,000 homes, 70 per cent of which will be public flats, and accommodate up to 159,000 people.

To provide greater flexibility, the government has also reserved plots ranging in size from under 10 hectares to 70 hectares in the innovation and technology park to accommodate facilities of different scales and uses.

The government said it would also accommodate a wider range of land uses for different stages of I&T, including building flats to house talent, with about 6,400 such homes to be built on the site.

The government plans to begin land formation work in the last quarter of 2024, and sites could be supplied as early as 2026.

The first batch of residents are expected to move in from 2031, with most there from 2034, according to the government.

Located in the heart of the Northern Metropolis, the San Tin Technopole is targeted to become the hub of the I&T development cluster.

Chief Executive John Lee Ka-chiu announced in his first policy address last October that the government would expedite the development of the technopole.

1684517093549.png


Professor William Wong Kam-fai, a lawmaker and associate dean of the engineering faculty at Chinese University, said the land grant method could accelerate development of the industry.

“The most important thing is to start the project as soon as possible to compete for innovation and technology corporations. If we adopt the usual open tender practice, it will be too slow,” Wong said.

He also said the government could offer more tax concessions to attract leading businesses, while stipulating that they had to hire a certain number of local staff.

Lawmaker Tony Tse Wai-chuen, who represents the architectural, surveying, planning and landscape sector, said land planning procedures should be more flexible to accommodate the fast-changing needs of tech companies but the mechanism should not be abused.

Apart from granting land directly to companies, Tse said, the government could also consider launching restricted tenders, such as limiting the scope to companies with investment plans.

Fiona Sun
Fiona Sun joined the Hong Kong desk of the Post in 2019. She writes on issues that matter to the city’s residents, including geographic communities, ethnic minorities or those brought together by common causes and interests. She has a master's degree in journalism from the University of Hong Kong.

Edith Lin
Edith joined the Post as a reporter in 2022 and covers Hong Kong's housing, land and development. Prior to joining the Post, she was a reporter at Radio Television Hong Kong.





:yahoo:This will provide affordable accommodation to young people. :yahoo:
 
Don't know Hong kong has much lands left, Hong kong should be merged with Shenzhen.
 
Don't know Hong kong has much lands left, Hong kong should be merged with Shenzhen.

There is A LOT of land in HK and only 30% is used. The rest is make into Park.

Some land in HK territory is hilly but with modern technologies, this is not a problem (many environazi say cannot destroy environment). There are luxury skycrapper appartment on top of hills.

Some territory of HK is designated is native farmland. Cant build anything there.

A lot of HK sea is shallow. THey can easily reclaim lots of land.

In short HK is FKed by UK and her comprador tycoon.

These drastic policies were implemented just before 1997.

1684557870257.png
 
Don't know Hong kong has much lands left,

1684568715423.png

 
Last edited:
At the China side, you see skyscrapers. HK side is full of fish farm and mangrove.

Then HK elites tell people never mind you pay 2 million USD for 50 sqm house, most important is environment and forrest.

White man environazi is ultra toxic, and have an anti development agenda. They hate peasants, and want everyone to be poor.



1684570781581.png
 
1684568715423-png.930564


200K+ HKers are living in subdivided flats. Millions of HKers are cramped in small public housing flats, which have been allocated 1.5% of HK's land.

Meanwhile, 1.4% of land is allocated for fish ponds, almost the same as the amount of land allocated for public housing.
3.1% of land is allocated for 'rural settlements' (like the ones in the second video), more than 2x the amount of land allocated for public housing.


 
HK is a money losing "province", while on the book she seems to be profitable. HK leeches on China, keep asking favor, and and prosper because China ban other province especially Shanghai from performing many of the roles HK is doing.
 

12,000 flats proposed for Hong Kong golf course site :D will be ‘surplus’ to estimated demand, planning official says

  • Government has identified sufficient land to build about 360,000 public flats in the coming decade to meet estimated demand of 301,000 homes
  • But district planning officer tells hearing government has yet to take back all the land it needs and that housing proposal will go ahead

Edith Lin
Edith Lin
Published: 7:12pm, 19 Jun, 2023
The government will take back 32 hectares of land that forms part of the Fanling golf course. Photo: Dickson Lee

The government will take back 32 hectares of land that forms part of the Fanling golf course. Photo: Dickson Lee

Public housing proposed for part of Hong Kong’s oldest golf course will be surplus to estimated demand for flats, a senior planning official has revealed, while underscoring the government’s determination to press on with the controversial scheme.

District Planning Officer Anthony Luk Kwok-on said on Monday that the proposed 12,000 flats earmarked for a section of the exclusive Fanling golf course to be returned to the government would be among 59,000 homes to be built that were “surplus” to estimated demand in the coming decade. 👍

“But the government has yet to take back all the land it needs in the coming decade … We cannot take the issue lightly. We don’t have the confidence to let go of all 59,000 homes,” Luk told a Town Planning Board hearing on the golf course project.

“We cannot easily give up on any housing options within the decade just because we reach the target.”

The government has identified sufficient land to build about 360,000 public rental flats in the coming decade to meet an estimated demand of 301,000 homes. That means the government will have a surplus of 59,000 flats. 👍

The Hong Kong Golf Club leases 172 hectares of land at Fanling. Photo: May Tse

The Hong Kong Golf Club leases 172 hectares of land at Fanling. Photo: May Tse

Luk, from the Planning Department, said scheduled housing projects could need more time because of construction delays and the process of taking back land.

The government will take back 32 hectares of land from the 172-hectare Fanling golf course in September, with nine hectares earmarked for housing development and the remainder for conservation and recreational uses.

The private Hong Kong Golf Club, which currently leases the 172 hectares of land, has strongly opposed the housing proposal. :angry: Officials have noted the club will still have 140 hectares left after the land is handed back, with two complete 18-hole courses and 10 holes for a third course.

The government earlier said the housing proposal would be amended by the end of next year to respond to environmental requirements including striving to preserve a 0.39-hectare woodland in the heart of the housing area.

A number of business heavyweights and professionals appeared at Monday’s hearing in a personal capacity to oppose the housing plan.

Li Ning, executive director of Henderson Investment Limited, a subsidiary of developer Henderson Land Development, backed the club in his capacity as its former captain.

He said board members would be “a government puppet with no sense of duty to the people and taxpayers” if they approved the housing proposal. Li urged the government to develop brownfield sites, referring to rural land now used for industrial purposes, storage and parking.

“I can tell you building on a brownfield site should be quicker and less costly [needing] to satisfy the issues on the proposed plan,” Li said.

Luk, however, dismissed Li’s suggestion, saying developing brownfield sites would take time to relocate residents and operators, while the golf course proposal did not require such efforts. :enjoy:

Raymond Fung Wing-kay, a former senior government architect, said the area should be used as open space rather than developing housing on it.

“We protect country parks because we value public space. The reason we neglect Fanling golf course is that we do not treat it as space we can access … If these 32 hectares become open space, we will have a completely different thought,” Fung said.

1687216861765.png


Fung added that only a small portion of residents would enjoy the proposed public housing in a “heavenly environment”, a situation no different from the existing golf club’s exclusive membership.

He said it would be “the pot calling the kettle black”, adding those living there in the future would feel pressured for their homes having damaged beautiful scenery. :blink:

China State Construction International Holdings independent non-executive director Raymond Leung Hoi-ming, veteran surveyor Wan Man-yee and Gloria Ng Wong Yee-man, former head of the North District Hospital governing committee, also raised objections at the hearing to developing the 112-year-old course for ecological, historical and traffic reasons.

Anthony Chiu Kwok-wai, executive director of the Federation of Public Housing Estates, told the hearing the homes built on the course were crucial to improve conditions of those living in subdivided flats.

Centrist political party Third Side, which has the city’s single non-establishment lawmaker, said board members should consider the proposal from the perspective of low-income earners. It said the government could consider building golf courses on other recreational sites. :agree:

The average waiting time for a public rental flat stood at 5.3 years as of March. :woot:


Edith Lin
Edith Lin
Edith joined the Post as a reporter in 2022 and covers Hong Kong's housing, land and development. Prior to joining the Post, she was a reporter at Radio Television Hong Kong.
 
200K+ HKers are living in subdivided flats. Millions of HKers are cramped in small public housing flats, which have been allocated 1.5% of HK's land.

Meanwhile, 1.4% of land is allocated for fish ponds, almost the same as the amount of land allocated for public housing.
3.1% of land is allocated for 'rural settlements' (like the ones in the second video), more than 2x the amount of land allocated for public housing.


I used to live in Tuen Mum in one of those rural housing, big house, about 700 Sq Ft, and they are dirt cheap( Well, cheaper than city rent when they are about HKD$13000 a month vs 6-HJKD7000 a month in Tuen Mum)

The catch is, no one can buy those house/land, they are allotted for aboriginal villager.

Hong Kong don't really give a damn about Public Housing, there are only 2 type (3 if you also counted the government subsidized private home) You either wait 12 or 15 years to get into Public Estate, then you pay around $500-1000 a month rent, or if you are well off enough, Government build flat for people who can buy them off from the government outright via an allotment system.

If you can't afford either or can't wait for housing estate, then you live in coffin house
 
nothing can solve hongkong's real estate problem when the root issue is everyone trying to escape terror feudallord xi

the more you build in hongkong/singapore the more will move there

ask yourself why dont the cage dwellers move to some other chinese city
 
Back
Top Bottom