TaiShang
ELITE MEMBER
- Joined
- Apr 30, 2014
- Messages
- 27,848
- Reaction score
- 70
- Country
- Location
HK police prepare for Occupy Central protest
Global Times
*********
Above is the title of the article appeared on Global Times.
But on this thread, I do not want to dicuss that particular grouping itself. So, please refrain from making it a "ah China collapses" thread.
I have a fundamental question that puzzles me.
Occupy movement first started in the US under the name of Occupy Wall Street.
It has long since died down. But it died down not because the government/regime responded 'any' one of the grievances that had initially led the whole thing to set off. Hence,
1. Why did it die down before it achieved none of the stated goals?
2. Why the occupy movements elsewhere are so persistent although they are equally (if not more) mariginal (in terms of numbers, political will and formulation etc.) as the original Occupy Wall Street?
My answer to the first one:
1. The use of state police force and a total media-business partnership killed the OWS. Also, they lacked funding. If NGOs of China, Russia or others had provided funds, the movement would last longer.
Answer to the second one:
2. They are persistent because of their internationalized nature. Hence, they are not indigenous. So long as funds keep coming, people will remain interested.
But there might as well be other explanations.
Global Times
*********
Above is the title of the article appeared on Global Times.
But on this thread, I do not want to dicuss that particular grouping itself. So, please refrain from making it a "ah China collapses" thread.
I have a fundamental question that puzzles me.
Occupy movement first started in the US under the name of Occupy Wall Street.
It has long since died down. But it died down not because the government/regime responded 'any' one of the grievances that had initially led the whole thing to set off. Hence,
1. Why did it die down before it achieved none of the stated goals?
2. Why the occupy movements elsewhere are so persistent although they are equally (if not more) mariginal (in terms of numbers, political will and formulation etc.) as the original Occupy Wall Street?
My answer to the first one:
1. The use of state police force and a total media-business partnership killed the OWS. Also, they lacked funding. If NGOs of China, Russia or others had provided funds, the movement would last longer.
Answer to the second one:
2. They are persistent because of their internationalized nature. Hence, they are not indigenous. So long as funds keep coming, people will remain interested.
But there might as well be other explanations.
Last edited: