What is the history of China? Let us look at a foreign friend's Ideas.
Interview mit Helmut Schmidt: Wir sehen China ganz falsch - Nachrichten - Politik - Home - Westdeutsche Zeitung
China, as a test of world history: more than ten years old and the Prime Minister Helmut Schmidt has been concerned about the rise of China, the giant country.
Mr. Prime Minister, to listen to your speech, read your articles about China written, my impression is that you use the most cautious approach to describe the development there, I feel you have great enthusiasm in China.
Schmidt: not a passion, a curiosity.
Why curious?
Schmidt: world history there have been many brilliant culture. For example, in areas of today's Iran and Iraq, before there was a fruitful culture of Mesopotamia, there are even earlier in Mesopotamia culture. In addition, I also thought of the Incas in South America, Thor Aitken and Aztec and India, Egypt's civilization.
Chinese culture has been four or five thousand years of history, this is it so special, it has been there, although it was already very old. Why is this so? Why did other ancient cultures may have fallen out? This is where my curiosity.
If someone asks you, China is not pursuing expansionist policies, you always say, this country has never had such a policy to pursue.
Schmidt: No, I do not think so. But this is China's large population are related. In Europe, only one million, twelve million or fifteen million people, China has a population of hundreds of millions. A populous country. Meanwhile, the state emerged in Europe in the past one thousand years, that is from the UK after 1066 or later King Ludwig I said, our national language in Europe is also divided.
Each country has its own language. Sometimes use different words. In the 20th century, Croats and Serbs are in the same state of Yugoslavia. When the exchange between them with each other can understand, but they can not understand each other's newspapers. Because the Serbian Cyrillic alphabet is the language used, and Croatia with the Latin alphabet.
Instead, hundreds of millions of population are the same word used, even if some people do not read or write. And the Chinese people is a huge local governors and the emperor has the right to compete between the countries. Engage in expansion, not a crusade for empire, such behavior may be due to a large population reasons.
In that glorious centuries, the Chinese people not only the vast territory of China, but also in culture and civilization of the leading position on the very clear that if they go to oppress other nations, will make them the pride of the discount . I said this time is that until 1500. At that time China is the center of the empire. Ancient Chinese people is so declared.
Other people are barbarians in their eyes. The Chinese people, if foreign capital occasionally to kowtow to their, tribute, and then go home, is enough. Chinese people to let foreigners know that China is big country, but only a marginal phenomenon in other countries only. This is not just cultural self-confidence, could lead to a very large extent, Chinese people do not pursue the policy of the imperialist-style.
They are different with the Romans, with the Athens Federation and other cultures are also different. Even the Egyptians have tried to extend their rule to Iraq or Persia. Chinese people do not advocate the expansion, there was only twice exception.
With experience in China and contacts with Chinese people, your own ideas changed?
Schmidt: possible, but I can not eleven minutes to carefully think out what has changed. However, each time to go, I have more impressive to Chinese people's cultural achievements.
I mention the last few issues. Do you know why you are open-minded of other cultures? Contact should be no relationship between family environment, right?
Schmidt: You are right. What is the role the family did not. As I interviewed the first to say, I'm always curious. The world has many ancient cultures, I have full respect for them. Such as Egypt. Just think of literature in the West known as Akhenaten's already dead Pharaoh Amun IV feats.
He had to abolish polytheism, he implemented a god. But he did not obtain long-term historical success. After his death, everything goes back to. This than Martin Luther achieved much greater achievements. I think this is fascinating. I used to have an Egyptian friend who was murdered in the State President Sadat.
He said to Moses, from the Aihe that Dayton has a spiritual bridge between, I can not find any evidence. One can not rule out this possibility. Moses probably in a hundred years after the Dayton Aihe it. At that time, another culture has experienced a brilliant development. But not a highly developed culture as Chinese culture that does not need God or deityd to be able to develop very well.
Why is it so?
Schmidt: hard to say. Perhaps they lack imagination, but it is also impossible. For me this is a mystery.