Hindus cannot be compared to Nazis

[Maira La]

I've seen a lot of people lately comparing Hindus and Hindutva to Nazis and their racist ideologies.

That is extremely unfair to Nazis on so many levels. However I don't feel like writing an essay on their differences right now, but just going to provide a single example.

Hindu Brahmins, India's top priestly class, do not accept blood transfusion from fellow Indians of different caste event at death bed. On the other hand Nazis would never refuse blood transfusion from fellow German of different class.

So who is more fit for modern society, a Hindu Brahmin or a Nazi?

 

[vi-va]

I've seen a lot of people lately comparing Hindus and Hindutva to Nazis and their racist ideologies.

That is extremely unfair to Nazis on so many levels. However I don't feel like writing an essay on their differences right now, but just going to provide a single example.

Hindu Brahmins, India's top priestly class, do not accept blood transfusion from fellow Indians of different caste event at death bed. On the other hand Nazis would never refuse blood transfusion from fellow German of different class.

So who is more fit for modern society, a Hindu Brahmin or a Nazi?

Hindu has no detailed history records, only a few books recorded what happened which comes from Chinese visitors, travelers, Buddhist. Pardon me if I am wrong.

Faxian - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

Records of the Western Regions - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

Yingya Shenglan - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

Hindu rely on a few fairy tales to construct their history and nations.

The ideology and philosophy of Hindu is contradictory, confused, lack of insights and wisdom. Just some fabricated stories.

The nowadays Hindu influenced hugely by Anglo-Saxon, economically, culturally, politically and mentally.

Hindus are trying to build a spiritual core. RSS is trying to construct one and spread all over India. We will see.

===========
Edit:
Countries like Pakistan, Bangladesh, and Iran has an Islam spiritual core. Anglo-Saxon hate Islam because Islam countries are very hard to be assimilated.

China on the other hand, is a secular country throughout history, which is much easier to be assimilated in theory. But China has very long civilization, very proud history, strong culture core. China was the most powerful country in East Asia most of the time in history, and China culture inspired countries around like Korea, Japan, Vietnam, and all nomads in North of China.

Anglo-Saxon hate China, Russia because those two countries resist their influence, pressures, and assimilation.

================
While India is a easier target. India is not a secular country, but not a very religious countries neither. Hindu culture is easier to be assimilated, see how comfortable those Indians living abroad. India as nation is much easier to be penetrated, culturally, and economically.

The West dislike Modi, too nationalism. Modi is banning western social media, and creating India version. Modi is doing what Chinese did in past decades, resisting foreign influence and taking back control.
==========

The West is good at manipulating social media, especially on Facebook and twitter, also Google Search. The West actually like the old India, weak, easier to be manipulated. But since Japan is too foxy, Korea only care about north brother, India and Aussie are the only tools they can manipulate. So be it.

India is going through Indianisation. RSS/BJP want to demolish Islam on India soil. India under BJP has some Nazi character to some extent. It will be quite messy and violent if things go out of hand.

 

[padamchen]

I've seen a lot of people lately comparing Hindus and Hindutva to Nazis and their racist ideologies.

That is extremely unfair to Nazis on so many levels. However I don't feel like writing an essay on their differences right now, but just going to provide a single example.

Hindu Brahmins, India's top priestly class, do not accept blood transfusion from fellow Indians of different caste event at death bed. On the other hand Nazis would never refuse blood transfusion from fellow German of different class.

So who is more fit for modern society, a Hindu Brahmin or a Nazi?

Nazis are fake Aryans.

The only people who actually own the Swastika are the Zoroastrians and the Hindus.

Cheers, Doc

 

[TNT]

I've seen a lot of people lately comparing Hindus and Hindutva to Nazis and their racist ideologies.

That is extremely unfair to Nazis on so many levels. However I don't feel like writing an essay on their differences right now, but just going to provide a single example.

Hindu Brahmins, India's top priestly class, do not accept blood transfusion from fellow Indians of different caste event at death bed. On the other hand Nazis would never refuse blood transfusion from fellow German of different class.

So who is more fit for modern society, a Hindu Brahmin or a Nazi?

So this means hindus are worst than nazis, i agree. It also is now proven that indians have small brains so this makes it worst.

 

[masterchief_mirza]

Nazis are fake Aryans.

The only people who actually own the Swastika are the Zoroastrians and the Hindus.

Cheers, Doc

That's what op is saying. Nazis just weren't quite up to the mark.

 

[Jackdaws]

I've seen a lot of people lately comparing Hindus and Hindutva to Nazis and their racist ideologies.

That is extremely unfair to Nazis on so many levels. However I don't feel like writing an essay on their differences right now, but just going to provide a single example.

Hindu Brahmins, India's top priestly class, do not accept blood transfusion from fellow Indians of different caste event at death bed. On the other hand Nazis would never refuse blood transfusion from fellow German of different class.

So who is more fit for modern society, a Hindu Brahmin or a Nazi?

But Indians take in Chinese refugees. I doubt Nazi Germany ever did that.

 

[N.Siddiqui]

Hindu Brahmins, India's top priestly class, do not accept blood transfusion from fellow Indians of different caste event at death bed. On the other hand Nazis would never refuse blood transfusion from fellow German of different class.

So who is more fit for modern society, a Hindu Brahmin or a Nazi?

How could in the 21st century, the age of reckoning and information, there could be this social stratification of a large part of the population.

The more we come to know about this apartheid, the more flabbergasted we gets.

And ironically the people who are in the eye of the storm, the sufferers cannot see it, or can't do anything. This is ironclad Brahmin stratification of the masses.

 

[Maira La]

But Indians take in Chinese refugees. I doubt Nazi Germany ever did that.

Are you happy Brahmin will not accept your blood?

 

[Maira La]

And ironically the people who are in the eye of the storm, the sufferers cannot see it, or can't do anything. This is ironclad Brahmin stratification of the masses.

It's impossible to do anything for low caste.

Without the reservation system they would not get any job no matter the size of their population.

With reservation and scheduled caste system, they get peanuts, but it's something nonetheless, basically a reward for maintaining caste status with government database.

If any group rebels, the peanuts are removed and gifted to rival low caste.

That's one way slavery system is maintained, among various other methods.

Be it nazis or Hindus both enjoys better goodwill all around the world then these present days suicide squad. Even Nazi will refuse blood transmission from Dhakkan.

Westerners respect Muslims way more than Hindus.

You are not even seen as a threat. You are seen simply as hygiene issue, like the sewage system.

 

[Jackdaws]

Are you happy Brahmin will not accept your blood?

Lol. Blood banks in India don't have any such restriction. Such rumors maybe spread in certain countries to prevent their citizens from seeking refugee status in India.

 

[-=virus=-]

It's true, we must eliminate 6 million + in tandoors.

We also need a Josef Mengele of our own.

 

[N.Siddiqui]

It's impossible to do anything for low caste.

Without the reservation system they would not get any job no matter the size of their population.

With reservation and scheduled caste system, they get peanuts, but it's something nonetheless, basically a reward for maintaining caste status with government database.

If any group rebels, the peanuts are removed and gifted to rival low caste.

That's one way slavery system is maintained, among various other methods.


Westerners respect Muslims way more than Hindus.

You are not even seen as a threat. You are seen simply as hygiene issue, like the sewage system.

That reservation system and positive discrimination is only making the caste system more intrinsic and emboldening it, by giving bait and dole outs to lower castes and out of castes Dalits.

Creating one anomaly to end another one, this vast well entrenched system of using and abusing the masses through caste divide is the same as slave lobor being subjugated and nowhere to escape.

No escaping this system.

 

[Verve]

That's what op is saying. Nazis just weren't quite up to the mark.

Nazis were just not fascist enough, in comparison to the genuine fascists the Hindutvas.

 

[Maira La]

Lol. Blood banks in India don't have any such restriction. Such rumors maybe spread in certain countries to prevent their citizens from seeking refugee status in India.

As an Indian of course you know it's true. I'd be surprised if you didn't. It's shameful you even embrace the system as a lower caste. Shame on you.

 

[gulli]

It's true, we must eliminate 6 million + in tandoors.

We also need a Josef Mengele of our own.

Figure of illegal bangladeshis living in India is much higher.