Hassan Nisar: UAE's warning is deserved for Pakistan !

[Manas]

 

[Muhammad Omar]

The man who Insult Pakistan at many forum talking about Pakistan ? Hassan Nisar F U

 

[Mav3rick]

Must listen to what he has to say before posting nonsense comments!

 

[TankMan]

An Indian uploaded the video, obviously he'll twist the wording to make it look like something else.

What Hassan Nisar said is that the Arabs won't be swayed by typical politician tactics. That doesn't mean we can't deny their demands or stay neutral. It means fooling around is pointless and we need to make our stance clear, which we did; Pakistan will stay neutral in the conflict but will help protect Saudi borders if necessary.

A lot of his criticism is logical but then he goes overboard with all of it. He'll go centuries into history and say that this was foreign and that was foreign and Pakistanis are confused and so on, what he fails to understand is that so many nations were developed through foreign influence and so-called 'invaders'.

For example, the US is made up of what were once European colonists; If the Americans had listened to Hassan Nisar, they'd have gone insane trying to return to Mayan, Aztec and Iroquois and whatnot culture and they'd have never formed a 'United States' at all.

You don't see the English going back centuries and criticizing themselves for having been invaded by Normans and Vikings, you don't see the modern Italians crying over the Roman conquest of Italy and the Balkan nations don't cry about Greek influence - then why should we Pakistanis drive ourselves crazy trying to 'return to our roots' and look for 'indigenous heroes'??

And everything he said about 'brotherly Islamic countries' is utterly pointless because the alliance with Saudi Arabia is mainly political.

Pakistan is a relatively young country. All that will eventually develop. The past is the least of our worries.

 

[SipahSalar]

This idiot also thinks Altaf Hussain is the best leader for Pakistan.

 

[Gandhi follower]

He is one of the sanest voice in Pakistan.

 

[TankMan]

He is one of the sanest voice in Pakistan.

If he didn't make the useless remarks about history and kept his cool when criticizing Pakistani politics, all you Indians would be calling him a psychopathic Mullah.

 

[Psychic]

He is one of the sanest voice in Pakistan.

Any voice against Pakistan is considered sane by Indians no matter how flawed it may be.

 

[TankMan]

Any voice against Pakistan is considered sane by Indians no matter how flawed it may be.

Most of his other statements are quite pro-Pakistani and logical; if he hadn't been so vehement when it comes to criticism, all these Indians would be calling him an insane mullah.

 

[Sugarcane]

He is one of the sanest voice in Pakistan.

And Indian went bonkers when he did a program with Pro-Khalistan Sikhs and talked about per-Partition promises of congress?

 

[Gandhi follower]

And Indian went bonkers when he did a program with Pro-Khalistan Sikhs and talked about per-Partition promises of congress?

Khalistani sikhs u mean terrorists.

If he didn't make the useless remarks about history and kept his cool when criticizing Pakistani politics, all you Indians would be calling him a psychopathic Mullah.

it can't be selective.

 

[Psychic]

Most of his other statements are quite pro-Pakistani and logical; if he hadn't been so vehement when it comes to criticism, all these Indians would be calling him an insane mullah.

Yes sir I was also his fan. But he is way too pessimist like some other pdf Pakistanis.

Indians will cherry pick his videos for sure.

 

[TankMan]

it can't be selective.

Moving on from centuries old history has nothing to do with being selective.

 

[mauka]

An Indian uploaded the video, obviously he'll twist the wording to make it look like something else.

What Hassan Nisar said is that the Arabs won't be swayed by typical politician tactics. That doesn't mean we can't deny their demands or stay neutral. It means fooling around is pointless and we need to make our stance clear, which we did; Pakistan will stay neutral in the conflict but will help protect Saudi borders if necessary.

A lot of his criticism is logical but then he goes overboard with all of it. He'll go centuries into history and say that this was foreign and that was foreign and Pakistanis are confused and so on, what he fails to understand is that so many nations were developed through foreign influence and so-called 'invaders'.

For example, the US is made up of what were once European colonists; If the Americans had listened to Hassan Nisar, they'd have gone insane trying to return to Mayan, Aztec and Iroquois and whatnot culture and they'd have never formed a 'United States' at all.

You don't see the English going back centuries and criticizing themselves for having been invaded by Normans and Vikings, you don't see the modern Italians crying over the Roman conquest of Italy and the Balkan nations don't cry about Greek influence - then why should we Pakistanis drive ourselves crazy trying to 'return to our roots' and look for 'indigenous heroes'??

And everything he said about 'brotherly Islamic countries' is utterly pointless because the alliance with Saudi Arabia is mainly political.

Pakistan is a relatively young country. All that will eventually develop. The past is the least of our worries.

wong analogy. paksitanis are like the native americans and mayans etc who are existing today. if they say that they want to return to their roots no one will question them. And similarly for pakitanis, you converted once, you could do it again.

 

[Gandhi follower]

Moving on from centuries old history has nothing to do with being selective.

u want your version of history, which is obviously selective and harmful.