Hasina a Hindu in disguise?

[tahsin]

Why is she giving away Bangladeshi autonomy to India? She is rounding up and killing religious people in the country whilst giving valuable Bangladeshi assets away like oil/gas fields to India. She is a traitor and needs to be kicked out of the country.

 

[SarthakGanguly]

Yes, she is.

 

[TimeToScoot]

She is a traitor and needs to be kicked out of the country.

Just make sure you don't kick her into India. No more illegal immigrants please

 

[jha]

Ofcourse She is.. A Hindu who is indebted to her motherland - India and is serving us well.

 

[Kaniska]

Why is she giving away Bangladeshi autonomy to India? She is rounding up and killing religious people in the country whilst giving valuable Bangladeshi assets away like oil/gas fields to India. She is a traitor and needs to be kicked out of the country.

If you are kicking her out then ask her to make proper visa for India and then enter inside our territory..

 

[rezangahir]

Is bagdadi a real muslim, muslims say no bcz violance>bagdadi ,then comes moderates like hasina<relegious violance still not a real muslim then what are the definition of muslim?

 

[bongbang]

Is bagdadi a real muslim, muslims say no bcz violance>bagdadi ,then comes moderates like hasina<relegious violance still not a real muslim then what are the definition of muslim?

Less religious feelings are good for humanity.

 

[EyelessInGaza]

Why is she giving away Bangladeshi autonomy to India? She is rounding up and killing religious people in the country whilst giving valuable Bangladeshi assets away like oil/gas fields to India. She is a traitor and needs to be kicked out of the country.

How about you try and follow the great principles of Islam we keep hearing about - respect for fellow humans, never questioning what is in another human's heart?

In short, forget if she is a Hindu in disguise, how about you try and be a real Muslim for real?

 

[That Guy]

She's not Hindu, she's simply an Indian puppet. Bangladesh has pretty much Lost it's sovereignty, so independence of BD was all in vain. Bangalis went from being under west Pakistan's control, to Indian control. Nothing has changed.

 

[bongbang]

How about you try and follow the great principles of Islam we keep hearing about - respect for fellow humans, never questioning what is in another human's heart?

In short, forget if she is a Hindu in disguise, how about you try and be a real Muslim for real?

Question: Do we have to obey our rulers even if they are oppressive and do things contrary to Islam?
Answered by Sheikh Muhammad al-Qannâs
#
The Prophet (peace be upon him) said: “The best among your rulers are those whom you love and they love you in turn, those who pray (make supplication) for you and you pray for them. The worst of your rulers are those whom you hate and they hate you in turn, and you curse them and they curse you.” Someone asked: “O Messenger of Allah! Shall we confront them with swords?” The Prophet (peace be upon him) said: “No, as long as they hold prayers among you. If you see from your rulers what you hate, hate the action they do but do not rebel against them.” [Sahîh Muslim]

Hudhayfah b. al-Yamân asked the Prophet (peace be upon him): “O Messenger of Allah, we were living in an evil (atmosphere) and Allah brought us good (Islam) and we live in it now. Will there be evil after this good?” The Prophet (peace be upon him) said: “Yes.” Hudhayfah b. al-Yamân said: “And any good after this evil?” He said: “Yes.” Hudhayfah b. al-Yamân said: “And any evil after this good?” He said: “Yes.” Hudhayfah said: “How will it be?” He said: “Rulers after me will come who do not abide by my guidance and Sunnah. Some of their men will have Satan’s heart in a human’s body.” Hudhayfah said: “What should I do, O Messenger of Allah, if I live to see that time?” The Prophet (peace be upon him) said: “You should listen and obey them even if the ruler smites your back and takes your wealth.” [Sahîh al-Bukhârî and Sahîh Muslim]

The Prophet (peace be upon him) said: “There will be rulers over you. You will agree with some of what they come with and reject some of it. Whoever rejects what must be rejected will maintain his innocence and whoever hates it will maintain his innocence. However, those who accept (what should be denied) and follow the ruler will be
sinners.” The Companions said: “O Messenger of Allah, shall we fight these rulers?” He said: “No, as long as they pray.” [Sunan al-Tirmidhî]

The majority of Ahl al-Sunnah wal Jamâ`ah have adopted these hadîth and use them as evidence in their ruling that is unlawful to rebel against the ruler, no matter how oppressive he might be, unless he exhibits outright unbelief. Imam Ahmad said: “Obedience to the ruler who is agreed upon by people is obligatory.”

Imam al-Tahâwî said: “We do not support rebellion against our rulers even if they are unjust. We do not make supplications against them and do not set any revolution against them. We believe our obedience to them is obedience to Allah unless they order something unlawful. We make supplication for their guidance and their safety.”

Ibn Abî al-`Izz al-Hanafî writes in Sharh al-`Aqîdah al-Tahâwiyyah: "It is much better to stick to obeying the rulers even if they are oppressors, because rebellion against them will cause even greater strife. Being patient with them will be an expiation for misdeeds and increase rewards.”

Ibn Battâl said: “Scholars have agreed that it is better to obey the oppressive rulers and participate in jihâd alongside them than to rebel against them. This will prevent bloodshed and prevent strife. The only exception is when the oppressive rulers show clear unbelief.”

Ibn Taymiyah writes: “The scholars of Ahl al-Sunnah are agreed that is obligatory to refrain from fighting in civil strife. This is an application of the authentic hadîth in this regard. Many scholars used to write that down in their statements of creed - that they believed in and they called others to believe in - to be patient and not to fight the rulers.” He continues: “The Prophet (peace be upon him) ordered people to be patient with the oppression of the rulers and refrain from fighting them. This is better for people for their worldly life and their Hereafter. Whoever opposes them intentionally will cause nothing but mischief. Allah will eliminate evil by way of the oppressive king much more than the oppression he is doing to people. It was also said that sixty years under an oppressive ruler are better than one night without any ruler.”

Although it is unlawful to rebel against the ruler, this does not mean we must refrain from enjoining what is right and forbidding what is evil. In fact, we are required to do that and glorify our religion and to raise the word of righteousness, each one according to his ability.

`Ubâdah relates: “We have sworn fealty to the Prophet (peace be upon him) to listen and to obey in prosperity and adversity, and not to dispute with the people in charge of government, and to say what is right wherever we are and not fear other than Allah.” It was also related by Abu Sa`îd al-Khudrî that the Prophet (peace be upon him) said: “The best Jihâd is a word of truth in the presence of an oppressive ruler” [Sunan al-Tirmidhî]

Alas, enjoining right and forbidding wrong requires patience, knowledge and wisdom. One scholar said: Enjoining for good and forbidding evil should only be done by the one is he doing and he should do that gently. .

http://forums.islamicawakening.com/f15/unlawfulness-of-rebellion-against-muslim-ruler-45364/

Why is she giving away Bangladeshi autonomy to India? She is rounding up and killing religious people in the country whilst giving valuable Bangladeshi assets away like oil/gas fields to India. She is a traitor and needs to be kicked out of the country.

 

[khair_ctg]

i agree with @That Guy she may be Muslim but she hates Muslims and she hates the history of Muslims in this part of the world

 

[AugenBlick]

Why is she giving away Bangladeshi autonomy to India? She is rounding up and killing religious people in the country whilst giving valuable Bangladeshi assets away like oil/gas fields to India. She is a traitor and needs to be kicked out of the country.

And mamta banerjee is a muslim in disguise ... her real name is Mumtaz Bano -al - bengali .... lets exchange

 

[khair_ctg]

And mamta banerjee is a muslim in disguise ... her real name is Mumtaz Bano -al - bengali .... lets exchange

so she was probably forced to change her name to Mamta Banerjee because of Hindutvas like you

 

[AugenBlick]

so she was probably forced to change her name to Mamta Banerjee because of Hindutvas like you

Actually @SarthakGanguly runs the bengali branch of RSS .. deceptively called "Shuddha Shonar Bangla Sangathan" .. a "social welfare" organization. He is to blame for this.

 

[LaBong]

There was some conspiracy that her father is bastard son of Hindu Brahman. Ask resident Jamatis, they will tell.