What's new

Haqqani Network, LeT spared by army in military offensive: US report!

Norwegian

BANNED
Joined
Aug 19, 2014
Messages
19,001
Reaction score
11
Country
Israel
Location
Norway
Haqqani Network, LeT spared by army in military offensive: US report
Published: June 21, 2015
0SHARES
SHARE TWEET EMAIL
906694-SecurityforcesPakistanArmyAFPx-1434857460-736-640x480.jpg

PHOTO: AFP

A US State Department report on global terrorism has acknowledged that the ongoing military offensive in North Waziristan and Khyber Agency has severely dented al Qaeda’s presence in South Asia.

“Al Qaeda’s presence in the [South Asia] region continued to face pressure from international, Afghan and Pakistani forces, and Pakistan’s ongoing offensive in the North Waziristan Agency [has] further degraded the group’s freedom to operate,” stated the Country Reports on Terrorism 2014, published by the State Department on Friday.

“South Asia remained a frontline in the battle against terrorism [in 2014]… [But] pressure on al Qaeda’s traditional safe haven has constrained its leadership’s capability to communicate effectively with affiliate groups outside of South Asia,” it said.

The report noted that Pakistan’s military conducted ‘significant counter-terrorism operations’ in North Waziristan and Khyber Agency, while the country’s law enforcement and security agencies carried out raids in the country’s provinces. “Security forces intercepted large stockpiles of weapons and explosives, and discovered bomb-making facilities and sophisticated telecommunication networks,” it said.

Even so, some groups continued to find space to orchestrate and launch attacks into Afghanistan and against minorities in Pakistan, the report pointed out. It said that while operations carried out by Pakistan’s military and security forces disrupted the actions of many militant outfits in the country, groups like the Afghan Taliban, the Haqqani Network and Lashkar-e-Taiba were spared by the offensive.

And while it acknowledged Pakistan as a critical counter-terrorism partner of the US, the report noted that cooperation in this regard between Islamabad and Washington in 2014 had been ‘mixed’. “Pakistan continued to deny visas for trainers focused on law enforcement and civilian counter-terrorism assistance,” it said.

The report also stressed the need for improvement in Pakistan’s national security and law enforcement infrastructure. It said that while the government rolled out many counter-terrorism plans, it failed to implement any of them completely.

“Pakistan promulgated a National Internal Security Plan (NISP) in February 2014, but failed to implement most of initiative. The National Counter Terrorism Authority (Nacta), which was formed under NISP, remained ineffective throughout the year due to the budgetary and bureaucratic reasons,” it said.

The report lauded the government’s efforts to reinforce legislation against terrorism and blamed the judiciary for slow processing of terrorism and other criminal cases.

On the other hand, it lauded the efforts of Federal Bureau of Revenue to counter bulk cash smuggling and acknowledged the initiatives of Pakistan Customs, which launched the End Use Verification (EUV) project to facilitate the entry of dual-use chemicals for legitimate purposes, while also investigating and preventing the entry of chemicals intended for use in IEDs.

At the same time, the report said, there is a need for improvement with respect to kidnapped US citizens.

Karachi in spotlight

The report noted that Karachi continued to suffer from political and ethnic violence by different groups, including militant organisations, fundamentalist groups, and the militant wings of political parties.

It added that some militant groups had garnered enough momentum to start asserting control over political parties and criminal gangs operating in the city and other areas in southern Sindh.

Global ‘terror’ death toll soared in 2014

According to the report, the global death toll from terrorism soared by 81 per cent in 2014 with more than 1,100 assaults a month.

There were 13,463 attacks in 95 countries in 2014 – up by a third from the year before – with Iraq, Pakistan and Afghanistan bearing the brunt of the violence.

Islamic State (IS) militants carried out the largest number of attacks, unleashing 1,083 assaults last year. The Taliban were the next most lethal group, with 894 attacks.
Haqqani Network, LeT spared by army in military offensive: US report - The Express Tribune

If the report is true, which I doubt, that Pakistan Army deliberately took no any action banned terrorist outfits such as LeT, Haqqani Network and Afghan Taliban, assuming they are "good" terrorists, then its nothing but a big shame for a neutral and honourable institution of Pakistan!
 
Last edited:
.
they pose no threat either to Pakistan nor US interests.......in fact the US can directly reach out to the Haqqani tribe members; just because their interests didnt always co-incide (they sure did in the 1980s) doesnt mean they have no lines of contact with them.

as for LeT, no such organization exists...it was banned in 2002. It's remaining members either joined other Kashmiri mujahideen groups or they formed offshoot groups.

there is a segment in the US administration (plus certain lobby groups friendly with indians) who benefit from such "reports" however they mention nothing new which we havent heard for years and years....old wine in a new bottle. And we dont require a State Dept. report to remind us of the successes of major military offensives such as Rah e Rast/Nijat, Zarb e Azb, Khyber-I etc. The results are on full display. We must continue to go after groups that pose danger to Pakistan and who aim to bring ill repute
 
. .
the report noted that cooperation in this regard between Islamabad and Washington in 2014 had been ‘mixed’. “Pakistan continued to deny visas for trainers focused on law enforcement and civilian counter-terrorism assistance,” it said.

Read: Blackwater/Xe Services "contractors" who are known to have used "diplomatic cover" for spying

damn right they wont get visas!
 
. .
As I said it is matter of priorities for Pakistan. Pakistani Taliban and Lashkar E Jhangvi are the more immediate threats to the Pakistani nation. No matter how much Americans shout and cry we should not take the war to the Lashkar E Toiba and the Haqqanis/Hekmatyars/Bahawal Khan/Gul Bahadur until and unless we have eliminated the Pakistani Taliban which pose a direct threat to us rather than others. Put our interests first and there will be no problems.
 
.
Hi,

Yes, just how conveniently US no longer thinks Taliban as terrorists.

We too have every right to move along with our operational and strategic requirements
 
. .
If the report is true, which I doubt, that Pakistan Army deliberately took no any action banned terrorist outfits such as LeT, Haqqani Network and Afghan Taliban, assuming they are "good" terrorists, then its nothing but a big shame for a neutral and honourable institution of Pakistan!

Why would we have to take action against LeT and Haqqani network. They are posing no threat. We should first concentrate on Indian funded bastards. Their usefulness against India can't be overlooked.
 
. .
they pose no threat either to Pakistan nor US interests.......in fact the US can directly reach out to the Haqqani tribe members; just because their interests didnt always co-incide (they sure did in the 1980s) doesnt mean they have no lines of contact with them.

as for LeT, no such organization exists...it was banned in 2002. It's remaining members either joined other Kashmiri mujahideen groups or they formed offshoot groups.

there is a segment in the US administration (plus certain lobby groups friendly with indians) who benefit from such "reports" however they mention nothing new which we havent heard for years and years....old wine in a new bottle. And we dont require a State Dept. report to remind us of the successes of major military offensives such as Rah e Rast/Nijat, Zarb e Azb, Khyber-I etc. The results are on full display. We must continue to go after groups that pose danger to Pakistan and who aim to bring ill repute

Interesting, so what your saying is that its all right for the Haqqanis/Afghan Taliban to kill Afghans in droves,bomb our schools, kill our children, slaughter our women but you wont touch them because they are not harming Pakistani interest ?

Do you really think that these barbarians wont turn on you once they have a safe heaven in the Afghan side of the border?

The NUG of Afghanistan is actively targeting Pakistani Taliban, because we know a stable and thriving Pakistan is detrimental to the stable Afghanistan, we are offering you a complete of change of narrative whereby we see anti Pakistan elements i.e. TTP as enemies of Afghanistan but here you are trying to differentiate between those targeting you and those targeting us!

I am confident that this is not the thinking of the Pakistani establishment because bottom line is that a thriving Afghanistan is necessary to Pakistan as a thriving Pakistan is to the Afghanistan.

/ Peace

@ghoul @Horus @Menace2Society
 
.
He said no such thing - he's setting the priorities straight. One more thing, you haven't changed because of love of Pakistan, but because of change of ground realities.

It's just business. You tried, you failed. We never fail.

Interesting, so what your saying is that its all right for the Haqqanis/Afghan Taliban to kill Afghans in droves,bomb our schools, kill our children, slaughter our women but you wont touch them because they are not harming Pakistani interest ?

Do you really think that these barbarians wont turn on you once they have a safe heaven in the Afghan side of the border?

The NUG of Afghanistan is actively targeting Pakistani Taliban, because we know a stable and thriving Pakistan is detrimental to the stable Afghanistan, we are offering you a complete of change of narrative whereby we see anti Pakistan elements i.e. TTP as enemies of Afghanistan but here you are trying to differentiate between those targeting you and those targeting us!

I am confident that this is not the thinking of the Pakistani establishment because bottom line is that a thriving Afghanistan is necessary to Pakistan as a thriving Pakistan is to the Afghanistan.

/ Peace

@ghoul @Horus @Menace2Society
 
.
Read my post again. I said no Haqqani should be offered a safe heaven in Pakistan. If they refuse to abandon their camps, force them to. But directly engaging in a war with them is not a good idea. I think they should be given an ultimatum to leave Pakistan altogether, if they don't oblige then its fair game to kill them. If they've already left Pakistan, then they should be ignored.
.


.[/QUOTE]

Sounds fair! Ask them nicely, we will treat them with respect, can join the NUG, if they refuse then I take your word they will destroy them.
 
.
The afghan national army has to conduct large scale operations like Rah-e-Nijat , Rah-e-Rast , Zarb-e-Azb to secure Afghanistan , time of throwing poo at Pakistan for own incompetences is over now
 
.
Why would we have to take action against LeT and Haqqani network. They are posing no threat. We should first concentrate on Indian funded bastards. Their usefulness against India can't be overlooked.

Terrorists are no one's assets. They are a double edged sword

Today they might be listening to your commands but tomorrow when they turn against you and start killing your people don't come screaming RAW/INDIA did it.

The day Pakistan will stop considering terrorists as their assets will be the day peace will prevail
 
.

Military Forum Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom