What's new

Govt considers closing missions in 22 countries

Edevelop

ELITE MEMBER
Joined
Feb 2, 2007
Messages
14,735
Reaction score
23
Country
Pakistan
Location
Turkey
@Aeronaut @Jazzbot @Leader @nuclearpak @Armstrong @hasnain0099 [MENTION=38934] @Argus Panoptes and others

ISLAMABAD: The government is planning to shut 22 of the country’s overseas missions, besides cutting down on perks and privileges allowed to diplomats and staff posted abroad, due to budgetary constraints.

The closure of embassies and consulates would mean a one-fourth reduction in Pakistan’s diplomatic footprint globally.

The country currently has some 70 embassies across the world.

Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif, a source said, had consented to his Special Assistant on Foreign Affairs Tariq Fatemi’s ‘austerity’ proposals, but would approve it on his return from China.

Five missions identified for closure in the first stage are in Port Louis (Mauritius), Santiago (Chile), Naimey (Niger), Belgrade (Serbia) and Sarajevo (Bosnia). The plan to open a consulate in the Iranian port city of Bandar Abbas has been shelved.

However, the missions chosen for closure have left many baffled. The government had indicated its intention to focus on trade diplomacy, but closing missions in Latin America and Africa could limit its prospects of reaching out to the emerging markets in those regions.

Similarly, till last year there was focus on developing military ties with Serbia to diversify defence procurements.

Pakistan had long pursued its case for opening a consulate in Bandar Abbas with the Iranian authorities. Though there has been no agreement on the issue yet, the government had made allocations for it.

A diplomat commented that a consulate in Bandar Abbas would have been critical if Islamabad were to pursue the gas pipeline project with Tehran or develop the North-South trade corridor.

The sources said there was little debate on the matter in the ministry.

The move comes in the wake of the government’s decision to reduce all non-development expenditures by 30 per cent. The government has set itself a target of saving Rs40 billion this year by reducing the operational expenses of various ministries.

The budget allocated in fiscal year 2013-14 for overseas missions is Rs10.9bn against previous year’s allocation of Rs9.74bn.

A retired diplomat familiar with budgetary matters estimated that the government could save Rs180 million by closing down five missions, while full implementation of the proposal to shut 22 missions could yield savings of up to Rs1bn.

But, some diplomats believe that reduction in diplomatic presence by closing embassies could prove to be ‘costlier’ than the apparent savings projected by the financial wizards.

“A number of proposals are being considered to cut the expenditures. But, there is no final decision as yet. It is work in progress,” said Foreign Office Spokesman Aizaz Chaudhry.

In addition to closing missions, the proposed austerity measures include a host of other spending cuts — something which has angered the diplomats who think that reduction in their allowances would make it difficult for them to live at foreign stations.

Foreign service officers are planning to make a representation to Mr Fatemi. According to one of the sources, the Foreign Service Officers Association had sought an appointment with Mr Fatemi on July 9, but there was no confirmation of the date of the meeting being requested by the association that has remained dysfunctional for years.

Allowances for renting houses, health and overseas posting are intended to be reduced by 30 per cent. Similarly, the education subsidy for children of diplomats is proposed to be cut to 80pc. Moreover, missions in Europe, America and Australia are likely to be declared as ‘non-family stations’ for the non-diplomatic staff.

Govt considers closing missions in 22 countries - DAWN.COM
 
Last edited by a moderator:
. .
To save PKR 1Bn?

Penny wise, pound foolish.

The real wastage of money is going on in Pakistan. The embassies are so pathetically understaffed and devoid of resources. Reduce the expenditures on the laving Ambassador houses. Heck even the Consulate General's houses are huge. The clerical staff in embassies is paid scraps.
 
.
Now if we Americans can only get our government to follow suit. :azn:
 
.
wonder on whose agenda he is cutting off Pakistan's diplomatic missions.... he is such a damn fool !!


yeh kingo Pakistan say badla lay raha hai... yeh marwaye ga Pakistan ko...


lanat ho nawaz kingo bin abu jahil ki ulad per ! :angry:
 
.
Yea, you take your useless family members with you on China trip and then you consider closing your offices in 22 countries to cut down national diplomatic ties and to loose those markets that too for mere 1 billion RUPEES.. Only super idiots like Nawaz and his advisers can cook this sort of cr@p :lol:
 
.
Actually those mission are being closed where 1) Number of Pakistani expats are negligible 2) Trade Volume is negligible. For example, instead of having diplomatic missions in Serbia,Croatia and Bosnia, Just one mission in either of the countries would do since they are geographically very close (almost integrated). Same is the case with most of the african countries. If a country (like China) is looking for securing long term resources for their economic growth, it would make sense for them to have diplomatic missions in Africa but for a country like Pakistan which needs investment and trade, it would help little because the trade and outward investment potential of Africa is negligible.
 
.
wonder on whose agenda he is cutting off Pakistan's diplomatic missions.... he is such a damn fool !!


yeh kingo Pakistan say badla lay raha hai... yeh marwaye ga Pakistan ko...


lanat ho nawaz kingo bin abu jahil ki ulad per ! :angry:
Just ask Pakistani expats in KSA who actually contacted the royal family for showing more flexibility for the Pakistanis and ordered the Pakistani Mission to expedite helping Pakistanis. Also what was happening at the same time in BD,Indonesian and Indian embassy when they got stuffed with expats.
 
.
Diplomatic staff spends most of the fund made available to them on their life style...
 
.
Back
Top Bottom