General of US Intelligence says No Plane Hit The Pentagon!!!

[shravan]

Gambit Sir,

I agree that i am a Crazy Conspiracy Theorist like the scientist, engineers, pilots, Major General, Victims of 9/11 and 52000 Americans who want to have a fair independent investigation.
----------------------

Sir,
Is the stage prepared for World war III ? Or are there some countries still needed to be invaded.

 

[gambit]

Gambit Sir,

I agree that i am a Crazy Conspiracy Theorist like the scientist, engineers, pilots, Major General, Victims of 9/11 and 52000 Americans who want to have a fair independent investigation.
----------------------

Sir,
Is the stage prepared for World war III ? Or are there some countries still needed to be invaded.

Please...Do show the forum where is it in the NIST report that say WTC 7 was 'poorly' designed, as you charged me of saying.

 

[shravan]

Show me the paragraph where the word 'poorly' was appropriate in context.

Sir,
It was not poorly. But it mentions that new buildings don't take into consideration of sprinklers not working something like that.

----
Sir,

I will stop posting now on this subject. Today I feel like a real crazy person. My aim has been achieved.

 

[gambit]

Sir,
It was not poorly. But it mentions that new buildings don't take into consideration of sprinklers not working something like that.

Right...But you have no problems putting words into something I never said. That is despicable.

Sir,

I will stop posting now on this subject. Today I feel like a real crazy person. My aim has been achieved.

Of showing yourself to be deceitful. You got that right.

 

[shravan]

Please...Do show the forum where is it in the NIST report that say WTC 7 was 'poorly' designed, as you charged me of saying.

Questions and Answers about the NIST WTC 7 Investigation
How did the fires cause WTC 7 to collapse?
The heat from the uncontrolled fires caused steel floor beams and girders to thermally expand, leading to a chain of events that caused a key structural column to fail. The failure of this structural column then initiated a fire-induced progressive collapse of the entire building.

According to the report’s probable collapse sequence, heat from the uncontrolled fires caused thermal expansion of the steel beams on the lower floors of the east side of WTC 7, damaging the floor framing on multiple floors.

Eventually, a girder on Floor 13 lost its connection to a critical column, Column 79, that provided support for the long floor spans on the east side of the building (see Diagram 1). The displaced girder and other local fire-induced damage caused Floor 13 to collapse, beginning a cascade of floor failures down to the 5th floor. Many of these floors had already been at least partially weakened by the fires in the vicinity of Column 79. This collapse of floors left Column 79 insufficiently supported in the east-west direction over nine stories.

The unsupported Column 79 then buckled and triggered an upward progression of floor system failures that reached the building’s east penthouse. What followed in rapid succession was a series of structural failures. Failure first occurred all the way to the roof line—involving all three interior columns on the easternmost side of the building (79, 80, 81). Then, progressing from east to west across WTC 7, all of the columns failed in the core of the building (58 through 78). Finally, the entire façade collapsed.

 

[gambit]

V0GHVEKrhng[/media] - WTC7: NIST Finally Admits Freefall (Part I)

XtKLtUiww80[/media] - WTC7: NIST Finally Admits Freefall (Part II)

Vz43hcKYBm4[/media] - WTC7: Nist Finally Admits Freefall (Part III)

And finally, David Chandler got busted for being mathematically wrong on another forum by people who actually have construction and engineering experience.

 

[gambit]

Questions and Answers about the NIST WTC 7 Investigation
How did the fires cause WTC 7 to collapse?
The heat from the uncontrolled fires caused steel floor beams and girders to thermally expand, leading to a chain of events that caused a key structural column to fail. The failure of this structural column then initiated a fire-induced progressive collapse of the entire building.

According to the report’s probable collapse sequence, heat from the uncontrolled fires caused thermal expansion of the steel beams on the lower floors of the east side of WTC 7, damaging the floor framing on multiple floors.

Eventually, a girder on Floor 13 lost its connection to a critical column, Column 79, that provided support for the long floor spans on the east side of the building (see Diagram 1). The displaced girder and other local fire-induced damage caused Floor 13 to collapse, beginning a cascade of floor failures down to the 5th floor. Many of these floors had already been at least partially weakened by the fires in the vicinity of Column 79. This collapse of floors left Column 79 insufficiently supported in the east-west direction over nine stories.

The unsupported Column 79 then buckled and triggered an upward progression of floor system failures that reached the building’s east penthouse. What followed in rapid succession was a series of structural failures. Failure first occurred all the way to the roof line—involving all three interior columns on the easternmost side of the building (79, 80, 81). Then, progressing from east to west across WTC 7, all of the columns failed in the core of the building (58 through 78). Finally, the entire façade collapsed.

How does this prove that WTC 7 was 'poorly designed'? Thermal expansion is a common behavior of metal.

Thermal Expansion Expt

The photograph to the right shows railroad tracks distorted because of thermal expansion on a very hot July day.

So does this mean, in your world, that rail tracks are 'poorly designed'?

 

[shravan]

Letter
http://wtc.nist.gov/media/JonesWTC911SciMethod.pdf
.
.

Conclusion
In closing, I wish to emphasize that there are now many capable individuals who are contributing to the quest for the truth about what happened on 9/11/01 and the possibility of insider involvement. For example, there are already over thirty-five peer-reviewed papers at the Journalof911Studies.com.
I wish to add my conviction that 9/11 researchers must not assume a defensive posture, supposing that we are just victims in a brutal chess game. Rather, we can increase awareness of the many lines of evidence that together imply that the 9/11 events involve much more than we have been told by the US government or by the media.

Many of us sense a higher Source guiding our research and peace efforts.
I am confident that by working together and seeking the facts with etermination, we will succeed in finding out the truth about 9/11. If we act before the next series of restrictions on our liberties, we should be able to achieve justice and peace as well.

 

[gambit]

Letter
http://wtc.nist.gov/media/JonesWTC911SciMethod.pdf
.
.

Conclusion
In closing, I wish to emphasize that there are now many capable individuals who are contributing to the quest for the truth about what happened on 9/11/01 and the possibility of insider involvement. For example, there are already over thirty-five peer-reviewed papers at the Journalof911Studies.com.
I wish to add my conviction that 9/11 researchers must not assume a defensive posture, supposing that we are just victims in a brutal chess game. Rather, we can increase awareness of the many lines of evidence that together imply that the 9/11 events involve much more than we have been told by the US government or by the media.

Many of us sense a higher Source guiding our research and peace efforts.
I am confident that by working together and seeking the facts with etermination, we will succeed in finding out the truth about 9/11. If we act before the next series of restrictions on our liberties, we should be able to achieve justice and peace as well.

That is a blatant lie by these people. A true 'peer review' process would have been done by those who have initial skepticisms. What they did was peer reviewed each other. If all are of the same mindset, then how can you have any genuine discussions if there are any errors, perceived or otherwise?

 

[shravan]

Gambit Sir,

Question. Not related to this thread.

What kind of Radars were the Chinese building in Iraq ?
That America had to destroy it in February 2001. If you know please tell me the real story.

 

[shravan]

That is a blatant lie by these people. A true 'peer review' process would have been done by those who have initial skepticisms. What they did was peer reviewed each other. If all are of the same mindset, then how can you have any genuine discussions if there are any errors, perceived or otherwise?

Now you are calling the Scientist in America Crazy. Good for you.

 

[TruthSeeker]

shravan,

Did you disclose the RAW connection to 9/11 yet? I don't see it in your posts so far. Please publish what you know about RAW being responsible for 9/11. You must know plenty, what with all of the expertise you have acquired about this. IF YOU DON'T, it will be clear that you are covering up for RAW. Are you a RAW agent??

 

[shravan]

Did you disclose the RAW connection to 9/11 yet?

I only wish one day India would become so powerful as you said. Thanks for the compliment.

Before that we have to do the Embassy thing.

I don't see it in your posts so far.

But the truth is we ain't so powerful.

Are you a RAW agent??

No. Never qualified. They told me i am crazzyyyy....

 

[shravan]