Well writer is correct that rather than having an Anual GDP calculation a Quaterly calculation should be adopted to get a clear picture of your economy. Even in Pakistan data was fudged several times by PPP and PMLN govt which affected our credit rating. Ishaq dar was notorious for fudging data and artificial blooming of GDP. You can easily kick up GDP figures by getting foreign loans and artificially manipulating dollar rate but that is a temporary fix.
Well you can imagine what the situation would be in Pakistan if PMLN refused to hand power to caretaker govt to run a credible election (which saw a peaceful transition of power to another party given the anti-incumbency)....and instead PMLN "won" a 95% seat mandate instead.
You tell me what would be the current situation resulting from that for GDP (esp credibility and sustainability) today if that happened, because that has happened in equivalent way for BD. BBS is an inflation laundering machine....and the reason is clear once you look at all 3rd party vetted data (trade, investment, loans and forex level)
PMIK has inherited a real mess, but at least first step of recognising the mess is done so it can be fixed over time. That is the main difference in credibility now between BD and rest of south asia that dont have 95% staged seat results....or linger at bottom 10% percentile of corruption constantly.
CPD has rightfully pointed out that the real GDP growth was 2.5% or less and the BBS has as usual inflated it to a baseless 5.2%. Some people here claimed that the CPD is an extension of BNP and Jamaat. But, its think tank is lead by prominent economists and thinkers like Rehman Sobhan, Debapriya Bhattachatiya and many others.
I am surprised to see no challenging by the BBS of the authenticity of the CPD statement. Some people in BD do not feel shame to steal, but feel shame only when caught red handed. And they love to hide it. What a vicious and negative patriotism of showing oneself beautiful superficially!!
I would like to see a BBS report where it publishes data to prove its claim of BD gaining 5.2% GDP growth is correct instead of a real 2.5% growth. BBS is hoodwinking people with fictitious data, as usual.
Well said....and of course we are seeing shooting of messenger already.
Just like that dhaka uni professor that pointed out that household consumption dropped in BBS own HIES survey once you factor in consumer price level.
BBS never responded to that....and same people attacked that analysis.
Then such people want to hold up ADB, WB, IMF or whomever else analysis/prediction....as though those groups have their own independent input data stream (regarding base consumptions and price levels) rather than the one published by BBS. ...i.e Nothing systematic from BBS gets baked in at all apparently....its all a fresh set of eyes and clean parallel streams.
Indonesia is in red -5,2% for second quarter report. Government predict for minus 4,8 but actual number is worse. Export being halted, consumption is down nose dive, tourism industry being hit very hard and our aviation industry is very much at their critical points.
While we are at it, China coast Guard and Navy until now shadowing our water boundaries in Natuna with their persistent precence, along with Vietnam coast Guard. This Made military expenditure rising for almost 20 percentage for next year. All in all this bring unpredictable era in the region
Yes this is going to be quite bad chunk of years coming up for many countries. Not everything is going to recover at same rate either...and there is likely some level of long term (5+ years) damage to many sectors...esp. given what the overall equity yields are looking like now esp for developing countries.
Quick economic survey can really show the real figure, so the question is that whether the think thank who made the report do some economic survey or not.
Yah, but BD does not like doing those credibly (the dhaka prof I refer to is one example where there was no response to a major real result that was overlooked in a govt survey itself).
If BD had some sense it would fund (or simply allow independent funding of) more economic institutions to offer better internal challenges and debates and RFI etc for their monolith govt econometrics....like is done in better standards countries (with better credit ratings and corruption rankings) as result.
But the ruling PM has all kind of vendetta against even their better economic minds like prof yunus of grameen. She has 95% seat result to brag and lord over any dissonant voices.