Gandhi was a British Agent and brought from SA by British to sabotage India's Freedom struggle.

[epebble]

I have also read on some blog that Jesus Christ was a Jewish agent created by Israel to take over the world. Roman Empire was very strong, and something had to be done to sabotage it from within.

 

[terry5]

Some also say higher ups in West Pakistan army were agents working for British interests .

Arise sir .......... . knight of the British empire .

 

[epebble]

Some also say higher ups in West Pakistan army were agents working for British interests .

Arise sir .......... . knight of the British empire .

Forget the British, they are dead and gone. Rumor de jour is that Pak army bosses are foot soldiers of USA.

 

[Skimming]

Forget the British, they are dead and gone.

British are gone but not dead. British are alive and kicking.

 

[MultaniGuy]

I do not think Gandhi was a British agent.

But Gandhi was not the smartest person around to be frank draped in loincloth and what not.

 

[jamahir]

My 2 cents. This is true that British were interested in getting Gandhi out of SA, but I don't think that Gandhi was a British agent. He was a genuine freedom fighter, of his own kind.

@Skimming, I agree with ^^^. Although what made others like Bhagat Singh, Subhas Chandra Bose and Jinnah oppose him was his penchant for traditionalist religious gatherings and hobnobbing with ritualist crooks. Below text is right from mkgandhi.org and will give you the difference in thinking of Shaheed Bhagat and Gandhi :

Bhagat Singh stated the truth when he said, “You can kill individuals, but not the ideas. Great empires crumbled, but the ideas survived.” He wanted India not only to be free but also a sovereign, socialist republic of workers and peasants. In a leaflet thrown in the Central Assembly, he declared, “We dream of a glorious future, when man will be enjoying perfect peace and full liberty. But, the sacrifice of few individuals at the altar of the great revolution that will bring freedom to all, rendering the exploitation of man by man impossible, is inevitable.”

I am not pointing to the somewhat violent imagery one gets by the words "sacrifice of a few individuals" but the general Communist / progressive ideas presented there - end of the exploitation of human by human, and India to become a society run by the workers and peasants who put in the actual efforts because of which a society functions other than through the thinkers. This is in contrast to the heavily theist and ritualist approach of Gandhi. Jinnah didn't like Gandhi calling on Indian Muslims to join the so-called Khilafat Movement on behalf of the British colonialists because Jinnah thought this movement will lead to the regressives and the priests among the Muslims gain prominence. Subhas too cut away from the Congress after having set up a branch within called All India Forward Bloc which spoke for a Socialist India after the British. In all, all three - Jinnah, Bhagat and Subhas were Socialist or Communist while Gandhi was an absolute theist and ritualist and traditionalist.

 

[my2cents]

It was not Ghandhi and and his weak band of beggars who earned us freedom but Netaji and his patriotic army and Naval and Air force mutiny of 1946

It was world war2 and helping British with our participation which won us our freedom. Gandhi and others did put pressure on British which culminated in gaining independence. I will not discount his efforts in forcing issues in gaining limited rights.

 

[my2cents]

What a rubbish as a Pakistani I feel offended not because he belong to our enemy but as a person he had values. He was in the favour of peace between Pak and ind. he introduced lawless movements some of his acts can be criticised but come on he was no British agent he was a one of the great leader of the century. This article bear no credibility what so ever. His life was simple and death a tragedy for both neighbours he and Jinnah if the both have lived a bit long would have changed our history

We fought against common enemy British. All our freedom fighters were united in overthrowing British.

 

[SaadH]

Only one man is responsible for India's freedom, Hitler...Gandhi and the rest were a side show.

 

[terry5]

Forget the British, they are dead and gone. Rumor de jour is that Pak army bosses are foot soldiers of USA.

Yes it does seem the case . British -Americans 2sides of the same coin .

 

[maverick1977]

He lost his life for it.

all agents are terminated… zia, Obl, gandhi, saddam and many more

 

[jamahir]

all agents are terminated… zia, Obl, gandhi, saddam and many more

It is not Saddam who was the agent of NATO but mullah Khomenei who was banished from Iraq by Saddam and went to live in Paris, protected by French government which was part of NATO. It was the Communists and other leftists and non-leftist progressives who agitated against the shah and when the shah abdicated NATO decided that their mullah agent Khomenei should be installed in Iran as "Supreme Leader" because NATO couldn't face the horrifying thought of a leftist Iran on the border of leftist USSR. Afghanistan on Iran's eastern border was already Communist.

 

[Skimming]

@Skimming, I agree with ^^^. Although what made others like Bhagat Singh, Subhas Chandra Bose and Jinnah oppose him was his penchant for traditionalist religious gatherings and hobnobbing with ritualist crooks. Below text is right from mkgandhi.org and will give you the difference in thinking of Shaheed Bhagat and Gandhi :

There you go again. Why do you make false and unrelated statements? I cannot comment freely on Jinnah on a Pakistani forum but I can post about SCB and Bhagat Singh.

SCB and Bhagat Singh were opposed to Gandhi because of his inaction. Religion and communism were not their concern, at least not their primary concern.

In response to Gandhi's call for non-cooperation against British rule in 1921, Bhagat Singh left his school and actively participated in the movement. But when Gandhi called off the movement in 1922, Bhagat Singh was disillusioned with Gandhi. SCB would refer to Gandhi respectfully but his strategy was to wade through blood. That's where he differed with Gandhi.

 

[Skimming]

Only one man is responsible for India's freedom, Hitler...Gandhi and the rest were a side show.

Where did you imbibe this propaganda? Do you live in UK or other part of West?

Care to explain how a victorious nation, Britain, that had many powerful nations as it's allies (USA, USSR, China, France, Canada, Australia, New Zealand) and also human and material resources of it's colonies like India etc was supposed to have been defeated by the leader of a shattered and vanquished nation like Germany, whose only worthwhile ally was Japan?

And if World War was the primary reason, why didn't Britain quit after first WW?

 

[ADIL SHERDIL]

We fought against common enemy British. All our freedom fighters were united in overthrowing British.

Not only against British ,Jinnah and Gandhi both wanted peace among both nations.